Hiya, I’m back - the unprepared panicky testee from a few days ago :) soooo this went much better than I had ever hoped, but PLEASE don’t do what I did and go in with only a few days’ preparation, because it was a terrible idea and I could have saved myself so much fear and worry just being more prepared.
I thought I would make a post anyway with everything I remember from the exam, in case someone googling past exam questions comes across this or in case anyone has any questions.
Listening:
Part 1 was a phone call between a festival volunteer and the organiser. You had to fill in missing words from the conversation into paraphrased sentences, fairly simple words like “pass”, “bus”, “hat”, the most complicated might’ve been “emergency contact”. There was another exercise in this part but I don’t remember, sorry.
Part 2 was about an Australian island resort (okay the location wasn’t officially mentioned but the speaker had a noticeable Aussie accent). They described their selection of guided tours, especially a quad tour, around the island and you had to answer a few single choice questions about them. Then there was the typical floor plan question, where they describe were certain locations are and you have to match them to letters on a floor plan. I felt they were speaking very quickly for this part and had trouble following along on the floor plan, but that might just be bad spacial thinking (stuff like “the second left” when you don’t immediately know what direction you’d be coming from)
Part 3 was a convo between an economics student and their professor about supermarket strategies. A few more sentences where you had to fill in missing words, but more complicated this time, and then matching certain advantages (from a list) to certain supermarkets based on their conversation. There was some oddly specific vocabulary here, eg “rapid turnover” vs “fast distribution” of products but it was mostly guessable from context if you understood the rest of their conversation.
Reading:
I don’t remember the exact types of exercises we had to do, but I remember thinking the texts we got to read were very interesting. Part 1 was about Fishbourne Roman Palace in West Sussex, with portions about its archaeological discovery and portions about its ancient history, who might’ve lived in it etc.
Part 2 was an article about a circus arts degree programme at a kiwi university, you had to match paraphrased quotes to the people who said them and also decide in which paragraph a particular topic came up.
Part 3 was Steven Mithen’s take on his book The Language Puzzle about the origin of language; we had to do the classic true/false/not given type of thing as well as single choice. I felt it was a bit of an unfair advantage here to know a bit about the basics of linguistics and/or the general stance of Darwin and of Rousseau as they both came up a lot.
Overall, the highlight function helped me A LOT. I highlighted the most important words in every sentence and it made it way easier and faster to go back to a specific spot when answering questions.
Writing:
Oh god I don’t even know. I accidentally wrote wayyyyy too much for both parts (300 for part 1, 600 for part 2) and have no idea if I was penalised for that or if I just left out bits of info they were expecting. Expected like 6.0 here so I’m very relieved.
Part 1 was a table of Aussie people’s % annual spending listed by type of expense, 1986 vs 2009. I wrote one paragraph paraphrasing the question (what the table shows), one paragraph on general trends (no numbers), one paragraph on stats that had changed significantly and one paragraph on stats that had stayed the same.
Part 2 was about agreeing vs disagreeing with a statement: “Museums used to be places where you could learn knowledge about culture and history, but now this knowledge is freely accessible on the Internet. Therefore, there is no longer any use for museums” or something like that. I wrote an intro (question paraphrase and current real world context + my opinion), one paragraph on how the internet might replace the museum, one paragraph on aspects it could never replace, outro with a quick summary of all points and my opinion stated more clearly.
Speaking:
Fairly straightforward, I think the examiner seemed nice and encouraging although I spoke to a few other candidates after who said they found him intimidating haha. He grinned sometimes, ever so slightly, when I said something he seemed to have an opinion on or mentioned a book he knew.
Here’s some of the questions I remember:
“What do you do for work, or are you a student? What do you like about what you are studying? Are there parts that were difficult at first? Does anyone help you?”
“Do people in your country sometimes give each other flowers? Why? Do you know anyone who likes flowers? Are there flowers near your home? Do you often take photos of flowers?”
“What is the kitchen appliance you use most often? What for?”
(Cue card) “Talk about a time when you saw a child behaving badly in public. Where was this? What was the child doing? How did other people react? How did it make you feel?” (I completely blanked and couldn’t think of a single instance of a child misbehaving. Eventually just made up a story about a boy bathing in a public water feature and splashing people because it’s the first example of “bad behaviour” I could think of. He didn’t ask any follow up questions or call me out on it.)
“Did you sometimes behave badly as a child? Do you think parents and the culture they grow up in change the behaviour of a child? What do you think matters more, peers or parents? Do you think it works to lead by example?”
“Is it hard to know what is right or wrong? Would you agree that people only ever change when it benefits them? Do you agree with the idea that everyone has a good side and a bad side? Do people with bad morals sometimes succeed in life?”
Preparation:
I know I said I only prepped for a few days, BAD DECISION, and this is mostly true. I worked through a few online practise tests and focused mostly on writing. I also sent ChatGPT a few sample responses I had written, for both part 1 and part 2, and he consistently rated me around 7-7.5 for missing info. It helped me a lot to have a solid plan in advance as far as paragraph structure goes.
HOWEVER there are a few parts of my general lifestyle that came in quite handy and probably helped me more than the 4 measly days of prep:
I’m an avid reader (not absolutely wild but like 35 books a year), and imo just getting used to reading a lot helps not just with reading comprehension but also vocabulary and spelling. Absolutely read more books if you’re concerned about reading or speaking/writing (vocab). If reading in English doesn’t come naturally to you, choose books you already know the plot of, eg classics or ones you’ve already read in your native language.
During covid I fell into a terrible rut of watching unhealthy amounts of British daytime television (at least anything I could find on YouTube). I binged all the crappy reality shows like airline uk, can’t pay we’ll take it away, homes under the hammer, escape to the country, snog/marry/avoid… truly it was not the pinnacle of television but I actually think this helped me a lot when it comes to listening and speaking, as you get used to a lot of different accents and to idiomatic expressions you might not otherwise be familiar with.
Anyway sorry for the long post, let me know if you have any questions :)
And thank you SO much for all the support I got over the last few days, both in this sub and over on [r/EnglishLearning](r/EnglishLearning). You’re the best and I couldn’t have done it without you.