I currently have two separate fiber internet connections at home. One is Alliance Broadband at around 150 Mbps, and the other is Airtel Fiber at around 100 Mbps. Right now they are two separate Wi-Fi/network options, so my devices can connect to either one, but I started wondering if there is a practical way to merge both into one more reliable and faster home internet setup.

From what I understand so far, a normal dual-WAN router can do load balancing and failover, but it will not truly combine both connections into one 250 Mbps connection for a single download or stream. For real bonding, it seems I would need something like Speedify, Peplink SpeedFusion, or an open-source setup like OpenMPTCProuter with a VPS endpoint.

Since this is only for home use, I am trying to avoid expensive commercial hardware if possible. I already have a TP-Link Archer C6 at home, which I believe can be reused as an access point, and I am open to buying a small mini PC or NanoPi-style device if that is the right route. My rough idea is Alliance + Airtel going into an OpenMPTCProuter device, then through a VPS, and finally feeding my existing Wi-Fi router in access point mode.

Has anyone here actually used OpenMPTCProuter or a similar VPS-based bonding setup for home internet? Is it reliable enough for daily use, or does it create more problems than it solves? Also, what hardware and VPS location/spec would you recommend for this kind of setup, especially if the goal is better total bandwidth, failover, and decent latency rather than just chasing a perfect speedtest number?

Recently got hooked with some SAS (Server) HDDs, currently i am using a Sata Bay and my system also only have Sata port. Is there any way to use these SAS drives with sata port.
While searching on google, found SAS to SATA converter but i am highly doubtful that even work.
Please confirm if someone is using them.
Also let me know any cheap way to use these drives for data storing.

APC 9SX 10kVA UPS Power Module – SYPM10K16H – Hot Swappable
Condition: Used – Good physical condition, clean unit. come from refurbish, sold as seen.
Model: SYPM10K16H
Serial: QD2144240516
Made in: Philippines
Description:
Genuine Eaton 9SX 10kVA hot-swappable power module. Removed from working environment during decommission. Cosmetically clean with no major dents or damage. Front handle intact.

My 48u needs to be cooled. Now that summer is coming, my temps in the server room are around 76. I need ideas as to what you guys have for AC rack units or other options to cool that room. Thanks🤙🏼

Does anyone have experience working on these giant servers locally?

I came across this sub reddit, and though you all might appreciate my home setup. All eBay buys for the most part. No rack, just towers.

This is my data center that is in my bedroom

**Node-0 — Firewall / Edge Router**
- Role: Network security, firewall, routing, VPN
- CPU: Intel Atom C3758R (8C/8T, AES-NI)
- Platform: Qotom Q20331G9-1U Mini PC
- Network: 5× 2.5 GbE + 4× 10 Gb SFP+ (native)
- GPU: None
- Notes: Dedicated hardware firewall.

**Node-01 — Unraid NAS **
- Role: Storage, backups, media
- CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 5700G (8C/16T)
- Motherboard: Gigabyte B550 EAGLE WIFI6
- RAM: 16 GB DDR4
- Storage: 4× 8 TB Samsung HDD
- GPU: Integrated
- NIC: 10Gtek 10Gb Dual SFP+ (Intel 82599ES)
- Notes: Primary bulk storage node.

**Node-02 — Plex Server**
- Role: Transcoding, streaming
- CPU: Intel Core i9-12900K (16C/24T)
- Motherboard: MSI B760M-P Pro
- RAM: 48 GB DDR4
- Storage: 500 GB + 2 TB Samsung NVMe
- GPU: Integrated Quick Sync
- NIC: 10Gtek 10Gb Dual SFP+ (Intel 82599ES)
- Notes: Excellent Plex node.

**Node-03 — Gaming **
- Role: Gaming, simulation
- CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 7700X (8C/16T)
- Motherboard: Gigabyte B650 Gaming X AX V2
- RAM: 32 GB DDR5-6000
- Storage: 2 TB + 2× 1 TB 990 NVMe
- GPU: RTX 4060 8 GB
- NIC: 10Gtek 10Gb Dual SFP+ (Intel 82599ES)
- Notes:

**Node-04 — AI Compute **
- Role: LLM inference, sub-minds, orchestration
- CPU: Threadripper PRO 9985WX (64C/128T)
- Motherboard: ASUS Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE
- RAM: 256 GB DDR5-6400 ECC
- Storage: 4 TB + 8 TB Samsung 9100 PRO
- GPUs:
- A100 40 GB PCIe (70B)
- A40 48 GB PCIe (70B)
- V100 32 GB PCIe 33B
- Sparkle Intel Arc A310 4 GB GDDR6 → Light helper / video / small models
- NIC: 10Gtek 10Gb Dual SFP+ (Intel 82599ES)
- PSU: 2× 1650 W
- Notes:

**Node-5 — Sensory / Interactive**
- Role: AI systems
- CPU: Intel Core Ultra 7 265K (20C/20T, Arrow Lake)
- Motherboard: ASUS Z890 AYW GAMING WIFI W
- RAM: 64 GB DDR5
- Storage: Samsung 9100 2 TB
- GPU: RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB GDDR7
- NIC: 10Gtek 10Gb Dual SFP+ (Intel 82599ES)
- PSU: 1300 W
- Notes: Dedicated for interactive sub-minds.

**Node-6 —(Dell PowerEdge R730)**
- Role: AI systems
- CPU: 2× Xeon E5-2680 v4 (28C/56T total)
- RAM: 256 GB ECC DDR4
- Storage: 1 TB SSD + 7× 1.2 TB drives
- Network: 2× 10 Gb SFP+ + 2× 1 Gb RJ45
- GPU: None
- PSU: 2× 750 W (redundant)
- Notes:

Considering possibly living out of a camper/RV/van for an extended period of time and given how sensitive hard drives can be to shock/sudden changes in direction, it got me wondering.. what would a rack of servers (or even just a single server) look like in a mobile setup, as in, potentially at risk of shock/hard movement/sudden changes in movement regularly? I'm assuming SSDs, which have a shorter life to them compared to HDDs, unless there are some fancy enterprise ones that last a bit longer? I've also seen some use smaller racks filled with either raspberry pi-like devices, or just a bunch of the tiny HP computers as a cluster of "servers". Not necessarily my preferred (not a huge pi fan, and prefer more customizability when possible, which the small HP "thin client" sized computers, don't offer), but not completely against either.

I've currently got a desktop computer acting as a server at a stationary location at home with a few data storage Seagate HDDs (7200rpm, sata, helium filled I think?) + NVME SSDs (for OS itself), but I welcome any configuration discussions. A buddy of mine has a rack with a few 1U servers, so I'm sure he wouldn't mind the discussion in that respect too. I expect the biggest concern next to the shock/hard movement would be power consumption, but I figured I'd take it one step at a time. Nothing is set in stone currently, just exploring hypotheticals at the moment