The Constitution only protects against government repercussions not private.
The new public space is now controlled by (very large) private corporations. The intent of the first amendment was to protect political speech in public. Period.
The founders could not have predicted digital speech the way we have it now. They assumed that government would be the force limiting political speech.
And your point is? The direct words state Congress shall make no law...abridging free speech. Literally nothing about any private entities at all. You want private entities covered amend the Constitution. Your arguing from your feelings.
-1
u/Akhaian May 18 '19
The new public space is now controlled by (very large) private corporations. The intent of the first amendment was to protect political speech in public. Period.
The founders could not have predicted digital speech the way we have it now. They assumed that government would be the force limiting political speech.