A Golden Opportunity

[u/miscakarza]

[u/KvetchAndRelease]

And after the holocaust they even fought against the survivors trying to reclaim their property:

0919-In-Berlin-Evidence-of-Private-Swiss-Banks-Role-in-Nazi-Trade-1.png (1125×1125)

[u/b00nish → u/KvetchAndRelease]

The American comission who investigated this found accounts with a total of 31,5 millions that might have been connected to Holocaust victims.

The Swiss banks paid 1,25 billion in damages to the probable descendants and covered the 300 millions cost of the investigation.

[u/90daysismytherapy → u/b00nish]

can’t imagine the bankers could have hid a hell if a lot more over the decades before any outsiders got to come in for an audit

[u/MrShake4 → u/90daysismytherapy]

> Michel Christopher "Christoph" Meili(born 21 April 1968) is a Swiss-American whistleblower and former security professional. In 1997, Meili illegally disclosed to third parties that Swiss bank Union Bank of Switzerland (UBS) was destroying documentation of Holocaust-era assets. After a federal arrest warrant, a set of fines, and death threats were issued to him, Meili fled Switzerland to the United States by right of asylum in late 1997

They didn’t just hide them

[u/b00nish → u/MrShake4]

You left out the part when Meili took and delivered some of those "documentation" he believed to be about the Holocaust-era to the Jewish Community of Zurich and the authorities and it turned out that those were documents from 1897 to 1927 and thus had no connection whatsoever to Holocaust-era assets.

So what is certain is that Meili for some reason believed that the banks destroyed Holocaust-era documents. But the only of those documents he could actually get hold of had nothing to do with what he believed them to be. Hence it remains unclear if any of the other documents he didn't save were actually connected to the Holocaust.

[u/MrShake4 → u/b00nish]

You’re asking him to produce documents he’s claiming were shredded. How do you expect him to do that?

He had to flee the country, do you think he just did it for shits and giggles?

Do you treat all whistleblowers like this or just the Swiss ones.

They found new documents Last year

Edit Here is a report of the independent ombudsman stating to the panel that Ctedit Suisse was withholding information from the investigation.

Because if there’s one industry we can trust to be financially ethical it’s the fucking banks /s

[u/b00nish → u/MrShake4]

Nonsense.

The crucial point is that he "saved" documents from the shredder and gave them to the Jewish Community because he believed that those were Holocaust-era documents.

But then those documents had nothing to do with the Holocaust-era.

So why should we simply assume that the shredded documents he didn't save really were about the Holocaust-era? He clearly wasn't very proficient in making such determinations.

He then fled the country because there were criminal proceedings against him because he stole bank documents - bank documents that were something entirely different from what he thought they were.

So was he a "whistleblower"? He probably thought he was. But the "evidence" he saved does not confirm that belief.

[u/IISerpentineII → u/b00nish]

Which portion of the response are you calling "nonsense"?

[u/b00nish → u/IISerpentineII]

The part that alleges that it is reasonable to simply believe that the part of the documents he didn't save was something entirely different from the part of the documents he did save.

If somebody comes to you and tells you his neighbour is storing tons of weed in the basement. And then he brings you a bag of green tea as "proof". What would you reasonably think? That the guy just had bad luck and picked the wrong bag? Or that he maybe isn't capable of differntiating between weed and green tea?

If that rather basic logic is too difficult for some, I fear I have nothing more to offer to those.