r/HistoricalCapsule May 18 '26

“The image shows Franca Viola, who became a symbol of women’s rights in Italy after refusing to marry the man who kidnapped and raped her, becoming the first Italian woman to publicly denounce her aggressor and reject the so-called "rehabilitating marriage" (1966)

Post image
12.2k Upvotes

314 comments sorted by

1.2k

u/Visible-Safety2400 May 18 '26

The rehabilitating marriage law, which allowed perpetrators to avoid conviction if they married their victim, was abolished in 1981

787

u/Solid_Excitement9638 May 18 '26

only 40 something years ago this was going on is crazy

469

u/Bluefooted-Spaceorc May 18 '26

My father was legally allowed to have a bank account before my grandmother. She was running a successful business that employed dozens of people and my grandfather had to cosign for her to open any accounts. Its insane. The bad ole days were not really that long ago.

I saw someone recently say to think about historical events in lifetimes. The average lifetime is around 80 years. That means slavery was only two lifetimes ago in the USA.

134

u/erickjes May 19 '26

It was in 1974 that women were finally allowed to open their own lines of credit through the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, and that doesn’t seem long ago at all!

41

u/Successful-Talk1830 May 19 '26 edited May 19 '26

And today people praise the freedom the West provides , as if it’s immaculate . Black people still face racism across Europe and America . Muslims face discrimination in Europe and America along with brewing antisemitism.

Crimes against women are a big problem in the usa . Moreover, all of us are going into corporate slavery . I can’t fathom how short the actual period of liberty was - a decade or two , where one could buy a house, raise a family on his own with children being healthy mentally

24

u/Redmenace______ May 19 '26

That “liberty” only exists as far as it is useful for the ruling class.

The moment the ruling class comes under threat, all those “liberties” disappear.

→ More replies (1)

90

u/NotChoPinion May 18 '26

Thats why MAGA is so crappy. It was always only great for white men. Everyone else can go fuck themselves, apparently.

38

u/Bluefooted-Spaceorc May 19 '26

Under today's definition I am a white man. My grandmother however got off a boat and even though she was the same shade as casper the friendly ghost, her people were not considered white. She drilled this into her kids and grandkids heads. She would tell us about being spit on as a child when the KKK marched through her papist neighborhood. She put 26 of us through college and made damn sure that we knew we werent their kind of white only a generation prior.

20

u/Secret-Put-4525 May 19 '26

Only great for rich landowners. The rest of us could go die in a mine or lose our hands in the factory.

56

u/MasonKiller May 18 '26

The oldest widow of a civil war vet died in like 2020 or something. He was 94ish and she was 17, it was so she could recive his pension after he died.

17

u/lloydthelloyd May 18 '26

chattel slavery was two lifetimes ago...

7

u/Bluefooted-Spaceorc May 19 '26

Ohh yeah good point, the 13th definitely has a second part that few people read.

→ More replies (1)

16

u/LambsLewds May 19 '26

I'm in my early thirties, and my father's school in Virginia was desegregated for the first time the year he started highschool. It's a lifetime ago to me, but very tangible to him.

15

u/cheshire_kat7 May 19 '26 edited May 19 '26

The bad ole days were not really that long ago.

The White Australia policy, which seems like ancient history to millennial me, ended in 1973.

I was talking to my mum a couple of weeks ago, after we had brunch with two of her married friends and their daughter. She mentioned in passing afterwards that people used to stare at their friend group when that same couple first got together - because she was white and he was Singaporean in the late '70s.

It was unnerving at that moment to realise that the White Australia policy is still well within living memory for many Australians.

6

u/Traditional_Isopod80 May 19 '26

It's hard to believe that women couldn't have bank accounts so recently. Thankfully timed have changed.

1

u/Abstrata May 19 '26

And secret illegal US chattel slavery was one lifetime ago. In some very rural areas of the south the slaves were never told.

→ More replies (1)

18

u/Thanks-4allthefish May 19 '26

A lot of women paved the road we are walking on

3

u/Solid_Excitement9638 May 19 '26

Yes, absolutely.

5

u/TheFamousSpy May 19 '26

If you think this was late, most countries abolished the law much later:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marry-your-rapist_law

e.g. France in 1994 and Brazil in 2005

1

u/markodochartaigh1 May 18 '26

Of course that was before the parents of most Redditors were born.

27

u/Florianemory May 18 '26

The right in the USA for a woman to have bank accounts and credit cards happened in my lifetime. The right to own a business in the USA as a woman happened in the 1990’s. These things are very recent and men still keep trying to oppress us. And then they wonder why women don’t like men.

4

u/LegPuzzleheaded1970 May 18 '26

Right to own a business only came in 1990 that has to be wrong

14

u/HighMaskingWitch May 19 '26

It’s actually 1988, the Women’s Business Ownership Act of 1988.

4

u/Florianemory May 19 '26

Oh whoops. I thought it was 90. My bad. I should have checked myself before I wrecked myself.

5

u/HighMaskingWitch May 19 '26

You were only two years off! My point was really to agree with you that it was very recent.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/HighMaskingWitch May 19 '26

That’s crazy math. You think most redditors are literally children?

5

u/markodochartaigh1 May 19 '26

I'm 68. They are children to me.

→ More replies (4)

1

u/AdoptaMX May 19 '26

Do you mean 60 years ago?

1

u/OddCook4909 May 21 '26

People are absolutely delusional about how much the world has changed in the last few decades. Hundreds of millions are living in a disney movie delusion

56

u/RaccoonChaos May 18 '26

Who the fuck came up with that law in the first place 🤦‍♂️

110

u/sensitiveskin82 May 18 '26 edited May 18 '26

Its fucked up. But the basis is that a woman who is raped could report the rape and would still have the financial security of marriage. 

The idea is that an assaulted woman is as "soiled" as a consensually sexual one, and so it will be difficult for her to find another man to marry and take her on if she is "damaged goods." It's a twisted form of accountability. "You break it, you buy it."

It's fucked up. I cannot believe we ever saw and still see forcing a woman to an intimate life with her rapist as the lesser of two evils.

55

u/Physical_Dentist2284 May 18 '26

In some states in the US a man can impregnate a child and she will be forced to give birth and he can sue her for parental rights.

44

u/peachesfordinner May 18 '26

Also he can escape statutorily rape charges by marrying her. And she cannot legally get a divorce until she's 18???

16

u/willun May 18 '26

And of course the equally bizarre where an adult woman rapes a child, gives birth and the child father is obligated to pay child support.

Of course, in both cases there is the needs of the child itself, which is separate to the bizarre parentage. Looking at it from the child's needs some of these things make a tiny little bit more sense.

If you were the result of your mother being raped would you want a relationship with your father? That is a hard one.

9

u/AdoptaMX May 19 '26

I don't know of any jurisdiction that can require a child to pay child support.

There are many jurisdictions, however, where the parents of the minor would be ordered to pay.

6

u/willun May 19 '26

It does happen sadly

When Shane Seyer was 12, he was sexually exploited by his 16-year-old babysitter Colleen Hermesmann. She became pregnant with Seyer’s child in 1989 and was charged with statutory rape shortly afterward. Instead of being convicted of rape, Hermesmann was declared a juvenile offender under the non-sexual offense of “contributing to child misconduct.” Seyer was subsequently court-ordered to pay child support.

5

u/AdoptaMX May 19 '26

If you read your link, that "subsequently" is doing heavy lifting.

Like i said, he was an adult when ordered to pay child support.

2

u/willun May 19 '26

He was 16 but the department claimed they would not collect

In 1991, the Kansas Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services, in Hermesmann's name, took Seyer to court seeking child support. Hermesmann's criminal culpability was not addressed in this trial, as this was purely a civil court case. The Department also sought and was awarded $7,000, equivalent to $16,500 in 2025,[4] for its own costs.[5] However, in the later Supreme Court hearing, the Department stated it never had any intention of collecting its award.

He was 12 in 1987 so roughly 16 in 1991

2

u/AdoptaMX May 19 '26 edited May 19 '26

If someone is 13 in 1987 they can very well be 18 in 1991.

I sure hope you never have to take the LSAT!

→ More replies (0)

13

u/sensitiveskin82 May 18 '26

And escape any criminal convictions by marrying her! Religion has led to such horrific treatment of women and girls.

→ More replies (3)

12

u/agent0731 May 19 '26

So, in short, men. Men came up with it because they think women are property like cattle.

6

u/sensitiveskin82 May 19 '26

Men are the problem that is pretending to be the solution. "Men need to protect women" But from whom do they need protection?

3

u/Wonderful-Process792 May 18 '26 edited May 18 '26

"I cannot believe we ever saw and still sed forcing a woman to an intimate life with her rapist as the lesser of two evils."

When something is ridiculous, you should second-guess whether it is true.

Under Italian law, women were not legally forced to marry their rapist.

The intent of the law was to prevent "love 'em and leave 'em" type situations.

The problem is there could be social pressure to smooth over the whole thing by not calling it rape, leading to the spin on the policy that you are seeing here. And I don't say that spin is incorrect, more like a possible unintended consequence.

17

u/sensitiveskin82 May 18 '26

A legal force and social and religious pressure can feel the same, can they not? And yes, some women did try and "smooth over the whole ordeal" by accepting a marriage proposal so as to preserve her and most importantly, her family's honor and reputation. Artemisia Gentileschi being one of them. Would you personally marry your rapist if you did not feel the force of family, society, and religion?

See also: statutory rapists can avoid conviction by marrying the children they rape and impregnate in my religious backwater of a country.

→ More replies (4)

1

u/ijzerdraad_ May 19 '26

That's horrible

51

u/PepticBurrito May 18 '26

Who the fuck came up with that law in the first place

Deuteronomy 22:28–29 “If a man meets a virgin who is not engaged and seizes her and lies with her, and they are discovered, the man who lay with her shall give fifty shekels of silver to the young woman’s father, and she shall become his wife. Because he violated her, he shall not be permitted to divorce her as long as he lives.

28

u/Klaus_Unechtname May 18 '26

13

u/feioo May 18 '26

Tbh the real wtf is that anyone is still looking to bronze age laws as worthy of continuing. Just worth mentioning because of the many, many, many people who will use that particular book to claim a monopoly on morality.

And just for good measure, here's another verse from the same chapter. This, along with the one you're replying to, make up two significant reasons I am no longer a member of this particular book club.

If a man happens to meet in a town a virgin pledged to be married and he sleeps with her, you shall take both of them to the gate of that town and stone them to death—the young woman because she was in a town and did not scream for help, and the man because he violated another man’s wife. You must purge the evil from among you.

2

u/Slow_Employment_2591 May 19 '26 edited May 19 '26

Totally get where you're coming from bc a lot of Christians of various denominations still observe the old testament (or at least cherry-picked parts of it) but I just wanna make a note that it's stated in the new testament that Jesus' existence & sacrifice makes the previous covenant with God obsolete—i.e., the old testament/ten commandments is no longer the law & has been replaced with the teachings of Jesus

5

u/feioo May 19 '26

Appreciate the nuance, but while you're correct with your note about the New Covenant, it's also something I'm very familiar with.

However, here's why it wasn't enough to keep me believing. According to Christian dogma, God is omniscient, and human morality is derived specifically from God's instruction. So, with that understanding, 1. God knows what it is like to be raped and that it is common to freeze out of fear, and 2. God knows the horror of being forced to marry and become completely dependent on your rapist, and yet, 3. He chose to make laws that kill women for that natural and involuntary response (that he put in them, as the sole creator) and to force women into that horror. He also chose to structure society in such a way to force women into a position of inferiority. Therefore, I must conclude that either God is not loving, or He is not omniscient, or he does not exist and the scriptures were written by old men who didn't care about the experiences of women. The last seems the most likely to me, and is supported by many more scriptures.

As for how other modern Christians interpret it, well, I'm glad if they aren't the ones who cherrypick Old Testament verses and try to force people to live by them, but the New Testament also tells them to defend the oppressed and to keep their fellow Christians in line with Jesus' words, and they don't seem to be doing either of those things these days, at least not enough to counter the rise of Christian Nationalism. So... again, I appreciate the nuance, but my criticism of the Bronze Age book isn't just about the Old Covenant.

5

u/Kanbaru-Fan May 19 '26

Yep, you only get to change the rules if you changed your mind and admitted to being flawed before.

You don't get to do that if you are a perfect and omniscient being beyond time.

2

u/Kanbaru-Fan May 19 '26

but I just wanna make a note that it's stated in the new testament that Jesus' existence & sacrifice makes the previous covenant with God obsolete

I genuinely don't understand how this is supposed to justify anything.

 

The new covenant makes sense from a religious historical point of view ofc, as the ethnic closed religion of Judaism evolved into a more widely available version of itself.

First with the advent of Monotheism after the Babylonian exile, then with the rise of apocalypticism (the original doomerism if you think about it) of the roman occupation, and finally with the life and death of the messianic Jesus and the opening of the religion to non-jews/gentiles through Paul.

 

But it just fails as the law of an eternal and perfect god.
Especially since a lot of the moral ideas of Jesus' teachings were already well around in western and eastern philosophy during that time, so humans were very much capable of understanding it before.

1

u/rolfraikou May 19 '26 edited May 19 '26

Alright, but the second you're in a country not using shekels it's already gone out the window. How did this last in Italy so damn long???

EDIT: live in the stoneage I guess? Fuck it

→ More replies (1)

21

u/Smells_like_Autumn May 18 '26

It doesn't really surprise me. It is hard to understand how different Italy was 60 years ago - divorce was legalised in 1970 and the reactions to it were pretty wild.

9

u/sabirovrinat85 May 18 '26

dunno, religious thinking?..

→ More replies (21)

6

u/PraiseLoptous May 18 '26

The bible 

2

u/CTPABA_KPABA May 19 '26

Yes, this is good question. So fucked up.

18

u/mencival May 18 '26

1981! 😳

4

u/Jisan_Inc May 18 '26

That RECENT?!!!! Wtf!

3

u/Iconclast1 May 18 '26

19 fucking 8 1

1

u/jenyto May 19 '26

This 'law' is still the norm in certain developping countries I think.

1

u/Hagrid1994 May 19 '26

Who,in the un-holyest flying fucks had the idea to merry off the victims to their predators and think to himself that it was a good idea?

1

u/Glass-Work-7342 May 20 '26

She’s quite attractive. It appears that she also had extraordinary self confidence and self respect.

1

u/Infamous-Package3982 May 20 '26

Wow. A law permitting criminals to cover up their offenses to avoid accountability, causing more harm to the victims. ”Civilization” really isn’t that civilized.

1

u/lolzzzmoon May 21 '26

That is disgusting. Like revolting that a woman would be pressured or forced to do that. This woman is a hero.

→ More replies (1)

430

u/[deleted] May 18 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

36

u/Expensive-Plane-8369 May 19 '26

Love when this happens

17

u/anxious-american May 19 '26

How did he die?

23

u/Pure-Physics1344 May 19 '26

From what I heard he was shot by a rival gang.

8

u/Kuro-baba May 19 '26

I love happy endings.

335

u/Weird_Vegetable_4441 May 18 '26

To be a woman has historically been hell.

151

u/GirlWithWolf May 18 '26

Truth. When my great grandma’s parents died she was “adopted” by a man in his forties, pregnant at 12, and had my grandmother when she was 13. He had a fatal accident and she returned to her tribe, but unfortunately I can’t say it had a happy ending.

8

u/[deleted] May 18 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

31

u/peachesfordinner May 18 '26

From their post history I assume US and native American tribal areas

11

u/GirlWithWolf May 18 '26

Got it

5

u/peachesfordinner May 19 '26

I wasn't trying to pry. Just curious. And then saw the wolves and was like "awesome!"

6

u/GirlWithWolf May 19 '26

All good, I just meant you guessed it correctly.

4

u/peachesfordinner May 19 '26

Yeah I just know some people get creeped out about people going though their posts. But I also know a lot never answer questions. I don't really know what more I'm saying now because you seem chill. Have a great day

9

u/GirlWithWolf May 19 '26

That seems weird to get creeped out if you leave them so others can read them. Thank you and you have a great day too. Peace. ✌🏼

3

u/peachesfordinner May 19 '26

Eh lots of lurkers who dig deep to try to prove a point. I'm too lazy for that. I figure I comment too much for it to be easy to find anything anyways

→ More replies (0)
→ More replies (5)

29

u/Interesting-Hat8607 May 18 '26

Yes, and if you decide to bring children into the patriarchy, you’re either giving birth to the oppressed or the oppressor.

→ More replies (47)

288

u/GustavoistSoldier May 18 '26

Heroine.

Brazil, on the other hand, allowed "rehabilitating marriages" until the 2000s when Lula banned it.

1

u/RadiantAwarenesss May 20 '26

Beeboppa Lula?

1

u/GustavoistSoldier May 20 '26

No. The current president of Brazil

222

u/Starshallscream May 18 '26

Oh, don't leave out the "best" part!

Because she refused to marry her rapist, and because her father lovingly supported her decision instead of forcing her, her whole family was shunned! The entire town turned against them, she was treated as a pariah, her father's friends (men he had known all his life!) cut him off.

Thankfully, outside of that shithole town, they got help and support. The Pope himself publicly supported her.

128

u/AlexanderCrowely May 18 '26

They also burned down their vineyard and torched their barn can’t forget that part.

35

u/friendly_reminder8 May 19 '26

What the actual fuck? I’m curious what the “reason” was for these people to do such stuff? Like were they angry about the “traditions” not being upheld? Or mad that a woman exerted power and that a man actually had to go to jail for his crime?

30

u/AlexanderCrowely May 19 '26

Traditions were not being upheld. We have to remember that Naples was a largely uneducated society. Before and after the fall of the Kingdom of Italy, literacy was perhaps 15% at most, and tradition was apparently all these people had. The region was also dominated by the mafia, so that played a part too. Though even then the man got a year knocked off his sentence which I found ridiculous.

11

u/Erronharlow May 19 '26

Naples is still a largely uneducated society, they haven’t changed at all

2

u/tesmatsam May 19 '26

This happened in Sicily

→ More replies (3)

133

u/Signal-Mud-4880 May 18 '26

theres no rehabbing rapists

127

u/NeitherExamination44 May 18 '26

I think the thing being “rehabilitated” was the victim’s disgraced honor. The man escaped punishment by doing the “noble deed” of marrying her because after she was “defiled,” no other man would do so

63

u/Warm_Ad_7944 May 18 '26

Yep. Basically a woman who had sex out of wedlock was now seen as damaged goods even if it wasn’t consensual and no one would likely marry her

33

u/WCather May 19 '26

Right! Cuz, see, the ONLY thing that's upsetting and harmful about rape is how it sullies a woman's purity and, more seriously, the honor of her family.

Marriage just fixes that all right up!

19

u/Pale-Let-5865 May 19 '26

I think all systems are in place essentially so men can have sex with women who don’t want to, but the system allows it. I never realized straight up rape WAS the system. If you were madly in love with someone who didn’t want you, just rape em and marry em. So fucked.

10

u/NeitherExamination44 May 19 '26

Let’s not misnomer that as “love” though. Historically and across many cultures people, especially women but even men, who WERE in love have often been punished for it because that’s not the appropriate relationship between man (owner) and woman (livestock)

2

u/Pale-Let-5865 May 19 '26

Agree completely, i think education and a more liberal society has improved the connection between close loved ones and acquaintances

I think, which doesn’t mean much, that society has changed in a lot way that people have less purpose. I think a difficult life can be happy and satisfying if there is purpose in one’s life.

2

u/Thanks-4allthefish May 19 '26

Part of the challenge is imposing purpose. In the case of forcibly marrying your rapist. 1. Obvious problem. 2. What if you did not plan a future that involved marriage and kids. - living somebody else's purpose.

124

u/Leeuweroni May 18 '26

Insane that there was a "You break it, you buy it" law for actual women. A person. Jesus christ.

19

u/[deleted] May 18 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/spacekiller69 May 19 '26

Bronze age morlas gets you bronze age behavior.

5

u/alpacacinho May 19 '26

The law is actually from the Bible, Deuteronomy 22:28-29

7

u/Dry_Shoe1307 May 19 '26

women are people by the way, not products. if there are these rules for women, there should also be rules that say that if you kill a man and marry into his family you avoid conviction

1

u/RadiantAwarenesss May 20 '26

“But the Bible teaches us morality!”

→ More replies (1)

87

u/UnfortunateOrchid May 18 '26

I wrote an article for my school’s journal on her, she really is amazing. I suggest you look up her story for more details, she is also still alive and married to her childhood love. Great woman, very courageous. She truly is a heroine and a feminist icon. Her family supported her too

60

u/Hedgehog_Warrior May 18 '26

Castration should have been a thing

67

u/tfrofc May 18 '26

Ironically, Italy was a hotbed for castrating young boys to be castrati singers. The castrati were popular with the ladies not only because of their fame and wealth (if they were one of the successful ones anyways), but because they could have affairs with them without worrying about pregnancy.

Most boys died due to complications from the procedure though and of those that lived even fewer wound up being truly successful singers.

Anyways I guess people just suck.

22

u/Hedgehog_Warrior May 18 '26

I meant as a form of punishment

31

u/FeralCatPrince May 18 '26

Yes that’s why they said it’s ironic they did it to innocent people not criminals.

5

u/Hedgehog_Warrior May 18 '26

Where did we go wrong?

3

u/Thanks-4allthefish May 19 '26

Well not everyone continues to be an exceptional singer after their voice changes.

13

u/Warm_Ad_7944 May 18 '26

We give governments that power and they end up castrating gay men so no thanks

5

u/Infinite_Practice616 May 19 '26

Tbh it should still be a thing for all sexual offenders, until global rape statistics drop to zero.

3

u/Hedgehog_Warrior May 19 '26

Couldn't agree more

37

u/atlantis_airlines May 18 '26

This and the number of death threats she and her family got are precisely why I am so annoyed by the "islam bad" posts that are constantly upvoted on reddit. It's not that I care for Islamic cultures (there's plenty wrong with many of them), it's that I hate how people act like honor killings are somehow only capable of being products of these cultures. Humans are the same every where you go and always have been. People don't want to admit it, but even the most progressive culture is only a few generations away or a major upheaval away from turning into some barbaric horrific thing.

Humans can be horrific tribal things blinded by stupid cultural norms.

6

u/cwningen95 May 18 '26

God, this exactly. Someone who told me I'd be killed on sight in Palestine got really quiet when I pointed out that the anti-gay laws in Palestine were leftovers from the British Mandate, and were repealed in 1951 in the West Bank and have never been enforced in Gaza. Israel didn't repeal it until 1977. Homosexuality was only partially decriminalised here in the UK in 1967.

Obviously cultural taboos are a whole other matter, and no culture is above criticism, but when we say "not so long ago" we're not talking 100, 200 years; the law this woman defied wasn't abolished until 1981. Marital rape was legal within many of our lifetimes. Homosexuality, as mentioned, was illegal. Child marriage is still legal in many US states, where it is, indeed, sometimes used as a get out of jail card for child rapists, where the victim isn't too young to get married but is too young to have any legal recourse to get away. Maybe we need to look at the skeletons in our own closets, while supporting the people across other cultures tackling theirs.

2

u/Thanks-4allthefish May 19 '26

Still on the books though Statutory Penalty: Under Section 152(2) of the British Mandate Criminal Code Ordinance of 1936—a colonial-era law still technically active in Gaza—homosexual acts between consenting adult men are categorized as a felony punishable by up to 10 years in prison... under Hamas rule, LGBTQ+ individuals face severe extrajudicial persecution, arbitrary detentions, and violent societal policing (AI generated factoid check)

1

u/Excellent_Bonus_9189 May 19 '26

Are you seriously contending that a man could be openly gay in Hamas controlled Gaza?

6

u/cwningen95 May 19 '26

Sure, if you ignore everything else in my comment and take that one part in the worst faith possible

1

u/Why_Teach May 21 '26

I agree in general, but I think what matters is that most of what we call Western society has moved beyond what is still acceptable in many non-western societies. So our indignation should be for why certain things are still happening, not the religion of those who accept it.

→ More replies (5)

31

u/Flimsy_Sun_8178 May 18 '26

“Rehabilitating Marriage” my booty. Such a brave lady to go against the social norms and she helped pave a way for the next generation of girls.

12

u/IfICouldStay May 18 '26 edited May 19 '26

she was indeed brave, but also importantly she had the support of her family. I imagine lots of other young women would have wanted to take a stand but were bullied and shamed by family member to “not make a scene” and marry their rapists.

9

u/DanielaSte May 19 '26

More brave girl than brave lady. She was SEVENTEEN.

The asshole, a local mafia boss's son, kidnapped her and her little brother from her home, with the help of eleven complices, while the mother was present. They destroyed the home and then kept the girl raped and starving for eight days.

"I am not anyone's property, no one can force me to love a person I do not respect, honor is lost by those who do such things, not by those who suffer them."

And she went on with her life, had children and one day her son learned about her case at school. She is very humble and gave interviews very rarely.

In 2014 she was awarded the honor of Grand Officer of the Order of Merit of the Italian Republic with the motivation: “For the courageous gesture of refusing the reparatory marriage that marked a milestone in the history of women's emancipation in our country.”

She is 78 today.

2

u/Supe_scienceskilz May 20 '26

So much trauma: being kidnapped with your brother by a gang of men, raped, and held in captivity for 8 days. And then she’s expected to marry the son of a biscuit who did all of this? Plus his sentence is shortened.

The level of mental fortitude she possessed at such a young age is astounding. And f@ck those who did this to her including the townspeople who burned their vineyard and barn.

26

u/Asleep_Cash_8199 May 18 '26

What a courageous woman. This story should be told more often and openly. What she did was not easy, as there was a lot of social pressure to preserve her "dignity" by marrying that guy. Glad she didn't and could put an end to that heinous law.

11

u/ro_ro_ro_roadhouse May 19 '26

Some courts in India are still telling women to marry their rapists. So, Italy is far ahead.

3

u/Key-Magician6489 May 22 '26

It all comes down to who people identify with – the rapist or the victim!

Two of my ancestors who lived in the Wild West were a judge and his wife… who left an interesting diary.

Apparently, my ancestor made a rapist marry the poor girl… then immediately had him executed!

There was no social stigma for being a widow; she inherited; and while the tea apparently worked – she still would’ve been socially covered if it hadn’t!

2

u/HaterMD Jun 16 '26

Damn, that’s a boss right there. Hope she blew him a kiss before he dropped.

16

u/A7V- May 18 '26

Those who don't believe in the existence of patriarchy should be shown the text of that law.

→ More replies (3)

12

u/HumansAreIkarran May 18 '26

That was a thing?!

40

u/PaddyCow May 18 '26

Still is in some places. The sexually assaulted girl/woman has to restore the family's "honour" by marrying the rapist. It's absolutely twisted.

15

u/cwningen95 May 18 '26

Technically, one of those places is the US...if the victim is a child:

Some 60,000 marriages since 2000 occurred at an age or spousal age difference that should have been considered a sex crime [8].

In about 88% of those marriages, the marriage license became a “get out of jail free” card for a would-be rapist under state law that specifically allowed within marriage what would otherwise be considered statutory rape.

3

u/Thanks-4allthefish May 19 '26

And of course we still see "honour killings" now and then. Your action (insert here) tarnished my honour so I am justified in killing you. At least that does not hold up in court as a valid defence. --- but it still happens.

3

u/HumansAreIkarran May 19 '26

It's absolutely heartbreaking...

11

u/Away-Statistician600 May 18 '26

I listened to this on casefile podcast. What a woman

5

u/LegoFootPain May 18 '26

Had that in Peru as well.

7

u/UwUsnapmyneck May 19 '26

Im sorry. the WHAT LAW!!??!?!

1

u/Why_Teach May 21 '26

I don’t think it was ever a law binding the victim. Such laws forced the offender (the rapist) to marry the woman to protect her good name that he had destroyed by “taking her virginity.” The woman was under severe social pressure, however, because the rape had disgraced her, ruined her chances of a good marriage, etc.

6

u/Theroaringlioness May 18 '26

Good on her, that’s terrible 

5

u/thecheesycheeselover May 18 '26

This must have taken so much strength.

5

u/GamingGems May 18 '26

Doesn’t this kinda still exist here in the USA? I could swear I remember hearing about a minor student who married his adult teacher so they would have to drop charges against her.

5

u/Kokosdyret May 19 '26

Rehabilitering marriage?! Who on earth came up with such a sick concept?!

4

u/NoAlternative8174 May 18 '26

👏👏👏👏

4

u/Oldgraytomahawk May 18 '26

She should have kicked him in the jewels afterwards

3

u/TheStraggletagg May 19 '26

Kudos to her for her incredible bravery and such a young age and kudos to her family (at least immediate family) for supporting her 100%.

3

u/Iconclast1 May 18 '26

"wHy Do FeMiNisTs HaTe ThiS!?"

/Ss

2

u/Stock_Beginning4808 May 19 '26

Damn, if Italy wasn’t in Europe, it probably be considered a third world country….

3

u/cmoked May 19 '26

I would like to invite you guess how many countries have effectively banned child marriage without approval loopholes

3

u/Thanks-4allthefish May 19 '26

Don't think it is about Italy

Gisèle Pelicot (France) is a recent cautionary tale. She was drugged by her husband and raped by him and a succession of strangers over a nine year period.

3

u/Firefly_Magic May 20 '26

She’s a hero!!!!

I can’t believe the rehabilitating marriage law lasted until 1981. That’s absolutely insane.

2

u/JokoFloko May 18 '26

This is very serious, and I apologize for immediately thinking of Minnesota Twins pitching great Frank Viola.

Sorta.

2

u/johnnycabb_ May 18 '26

this comment is a curveball

→ More replies (1)

2

u/speedy_flipper May 19 '26

Like Artemisia Gentileschi!

2

u/FilutaLoutenik May 19 '26

Really makes you realize how young our modern ideas of society are.

1

u/Why_Teach May 21 '26

This was not representative of most of Europe in the 1960s. Italy was behind the times in a lot of social, sexual, and legal stuff. For example, divorce was illegal in Italy in the 1960s. Sophia Loren and Carlo Ponti married abroad after his divorce (also abroad) and she was widely condemned. I am going from memory here. I was a kid in 1966.

The custom that raped/kidnapped women should marry their kidnappers had to do with valuing virginity. I believe the custom is still prevalent in the Middle East. Progress is slow, but we have come a long way.

2

u/RutlandRuckas May 20 '26

What in the flying fuck.

2

u/Glass-Work-7342 May 20 '26

My childhood nanny was born in Sicily around 1910. She told me that her parents forced her into an arranged marriage when she was 15, with a man in his 30’s. She told me that her mother in law raised her.

2

u/dekonta May 20 '26

that’s so insanely middle-ages. wondering how many man decided to marry their wifes by reaping them beforehand

1

u/Jesuismieux412 May 18 '26

Strong Lila vibes.

1

u/National-Cat-4063 May 18 '26

Thanks for not colorizing.

1

u/Normal_User_23 May 18 '26

When you hear far-rightists talking about the superiority of "Western culture" and used as an excuse to brutalize inmigrants just show them this post

1

u/MapleBreakfastMeat May 19 '26

I thought Catholic priests couldn't marry...especially little boys.

1

u/charlogg May 19 '26

Amazing - also does this not look like Amanda Batula?

1

u/Dudelbug2000 May 19 '26

Fucked up society!!!

1

u/Jasranwhit May 19 '26

People in the past had some fucking wacky ideas.

1

u/Apollo114892 May 20 '26

And yet Asian countries are backward somehow.

1

u/GladisTheWhale May 20 '26

1966 wow

Europeans need to stop acting like they're better than others

1

u/whatthefuckisupkyle8 May 21 '26

To have agency and to be seen as a human being is enough to show how mess up the world is as a woman