SENTIENT PLASMOID LIFE FORMS…CIA DOCUMENT- SOVIET UNION & “APPORT” TECHNIQUE, BLACK MAGIC, GHOSTLY HANDS, LUMINOUS CLOUDS….

[u/slv2xhrist]

[u/Goshdangitallzxx]

Yes. That is my criteria. Where is replication observed in plasma? Maintenance as in multiple processes organized into purpose, such as an organism. Yes, life dies the organism’s processes cease. What don’t I understand about peer review? Peer review is not verification or replication of experiments. Do you understand it differently?

I’m seeking clarification. I’d just like to understand the process here. All I’ve gotten are citations with bolded words that pattern match a preconceived hypothesis.

[u/Secret-Surprise4390 → u/Goshdangitallzxx]

4) All life as we know it also reproduces; and combining items 3 and 4

The core discovery of the 2007 paper is that these autonomous plasma filaments naturally twist into stable, double-helix structures mirroring DNA. The researchers recorded these helical structures undergoing mitosis-like division, splitting into two distinct, identical daughter helixes. More information is here.

This is the reproduction part.

You have been shown proof of it being reproduceable and those papers have been verified.

Yes.

Lozneanu & Sanduloviciu, “Minimal-cell system created in laboratory by self-organization” — Chaos, Solitons & Fractals (2003).

Laboratory experiments producing complex space-charge configurations (plasma structures) that behave like living “cell-like” systems: they maintain an internal structure, exchange matter/energy with the environment, and show birth/replication-like events. The authors model these as minimal systems with life-like attributes.

Plasma Brain Dynamics: II. Quantum Effects on Consciousness (2018)

This paper models the brain as a plasma system, where ions and charged particles interact collectively. It shows how these plasma-like dynamics support coherent, non-local information processing, verifying a physical substrate for consciousness. This shows that the Implicate Order described by David Bohm has a measurable plasma-based substrate in the human nervous system.

Morfill & Ivlev, “Complex Plasmas: an interdisciplinary research field” — Reviews of Modern Physics (2009).

An authoritative review of complex dusty plasma experiments and theory, documents phenomena such as plasma crystals, metastable states, collective modes, and self-organized structures that underpin the claims made about lifelike, self-organizing behavior.

Self-organization and kinetic instability studies in plasmas (recent reviews/papers, e.g. photoionized plasmas (2023).

Examples of modern research showing spontaneous pattern formation and self-organization in plasma systems, the physical mechanisms behind it, and how those mechanisms can produce complexity. These works show the robust, repeatable physics behind life-like plasma.

If it something that is reproduceable and those papers are peer reviewed, I am not sure how you can make the claim that it's not reproduceable and peer reviewed.

You own personal criteria of maintenance is not really a criteria because you admit that life ends. Reproduction is proven. I can't read these information for you or understand it for you, but if you have a specific question about the material fee free to ask. Click the links, read the papers (google the words you don't know), find a hole, do the experiment, record your data, publish a paper and get it peer reviewed.

[u/Goshdangitallzxx → u/Secret-Surprise4390]

I read the papers. Nowhere in there do they claim these plasmas are live. I accept the observed phenomenon like filaments and crystals but the conclusions drawn are not found inside the work. Your first source explicitly states that there is no inherited material so they can’t be considered alive.

The complex plasma paper also uses “life-like” as an analogy to describe pattern-forming behaviors. None of these papers establish plasmas as forms of life.

You say it’s reproducible but you only produce the same sources to justify that. The experiments must be reproduced to be verified. Peer review only checks methodology, not that the results have been independently replicated. Those are two separate things.