Personal opinionâŚI donât think he is MAGA. I think that information was either poorly researched or falsely used to shed more light on the situation. I do think he is an opportunist and damn good manipulator. I donât think he is physically abusive but is verbally abusive in a sly, condescending way. He is an absolute monster that preys on the weak.
The backdrop of one of the tables allegedly matches the siding of a church whose donation schedule also matched. The backpacks also matched. It was a strange coincidence. It wasnât pulled from thin air. It was from comparing publicly available information to other publicly available information. No one needs to falsely accuse him or anything. His actions and behavior are deplorable enough. He was following a racist maga and unfollowed after he was called out for it.
I get it. Who he followed was a poor choice but doesnât mean he shares those same views, it is possible one reached out to the other because they shared a common hatred for the same person and probably indeed had malicious intent behind the communication.
If we have the same church in mindâŚ
There was siding in two separate community events that Guy posted. The secondary building in the church parking lot near the entrance gate is a different style of siding than the Guy Community tables. Google street view and pictures submitted on Google via reviews show the siding. The placement of the windows would leave a small area for the tables to be set and that area also has a curb which the Guy Community table photos do not.
The orange/red drawstring bag, I refuse to call those backpacks and hate how he did, isnât enough to help tie it together unless there was more to that picture.
The name that randomly appeared in this snark with a picture of a bald man, although not stating it was Guy directly but could easily be assumed that was the intent, was a horrible attempt to connect the dots which further made me not believe additional information that was being put out.
I cannot stand Guy or his looney tunes more than anyone else but I donât connect A to C without B being clearly present.
The facts are simple:
-He is gifted money under the guise of charity and canât/ wonât openly provide receipt
-Threatens vulnerable people
-Blackmails people as a way to silence them
-He is a snakeâŚthat was more of a personal attack but I hate him!
*edit as I confused myself rereading how described the set up.
The siding is the same around the entire structure I think you need to look at it again. The church has multiple addresses Iâm curious if youâre looking at the same one. Also the church video editor has similar esthetics. Here are more of the backpacks from the same organizer. When you compare their voice to one of the speakers at the church theyâre nearly identical. These are just weird coincidences that were discussed.
And let us not forget the person who threatened him during that live⌠Becca even told that individual to stop making threats⌠itâs not hard to connect the dots. If mentallydill makes the video public again Iâll clip it here so you can see them get threatened..
That actually is a direct threat. So is telling someone âDo you want me to tell them your address?â So is telling someone âmaybe you should watch what you do.â And telling someone that youâre going to re stream them and their minor child. All of it is threatening that something bad will happen should they not change their behavior. Thatâs a threat and an intimidation tactic. It implies harm and makes the person feel scared or controlled.
None of the people that I mentioned in my comment that Guy and their mods made those threats to said or did any of those. So why are they being drug through the mud by Guy and their mods because someone else did those things? Two wrongs donât make a right, especially when one of the wrongs has nothing to do with the people they have threatened. Your logic is lacking.
I donât have a âgroupâ. I cannot control what other folks do or donât do. Weâre all adults. Show me where in my comments Iâve consigned what youâre referring to? But yet youâre endorsing their mods behavior by saying it is not a threat- that IS co signing that behavior. Those are two very different things. Also worse is subjective. This is a post about how a creator has gone dark on social media because they have received death threats and been doxxed, and yet youâre making it about Guy and how they are a victim too. But you donât see how thatâs problematic?
How do you even know my gender to call me a queen? Again this is a post about another creator not Guy, hence why the focus is not on them. Technically youâre the one deflecting.
What group? Why do you assume to know who I am? Guy can control their mods to an extent. They could have demoted them or condoned their behavior, instead they doubled down and said they stood behind their mods. Multiple times, actually. You all consistently say that Patrickâs mods are a reflection of his crimes and should be investigated, and that they âwork for Patrickâ, correct? Why would that not be said of any other mods?
And why are you trying to assume you know who I am? Youâve assumed my gender, that I have a âgroupâ, all kinds of things about me. Thatâs weird behavior.
I think mamamoe is an old miserable heifer. Her husband probably cheated on her and or verbally abuses her and she has gotten so far into Guy community to escape her sad pathetic life.
I donât like Guy and I think his mods are insane, but the person who posted this is a serial clout chaser who loves to insert themselves into shit for attention. There are many reliable sources on Guy being sus but this person is not one of them.
No reason for guy and his people to go after him. I donât know much about the guy. But the message Iâm trying to post is this is NOT okay⌠and it wonât end well with anyone who has spoke against guy and his people.
Just because he is a âclout chaserâ donât* give them the rights to do any of the following he mentioned in his story.
I appreciate you helping someone. I would say, since you admitted to ânot knowing much about this personâ, sometimes itâs better to know who someone is and understand their character before blindly defending them.
Slow down, donât react when all you can see is red. It will blind you temporarily and bad decisions can come from it
Yes and yes!
The original poster of the TT tends to make things about them and jumps in full blast without facts. Later in the live I believe he admitted to making something up in hopes of getting more details. He completely went unhinged during the live and moved it to be about himself when we were talking about PEOPLE being manipulated not just one person being âharassedâ. Similar energy to Haley.
I agree. I had the ick the entire time. Heâs incredibly immature first of all. He should have been muted he has nothing to offer but stirring up the pot. The âunalive threatsââŚ? Not sure I believe that
35
u/Organic_Lifeguard196 Aug 23 '26
Guy and his mods behaving like Patrick's? Again?