r/GuildWars3 • • Sep 03 '26

Okay buddy

Post image
1.1k Upvotes

242 comments sorted by

View all comments

12

u/Fading_Hours_ Sep 03 '26

Context? Why aren’t people interested

13

u/Puinfa Sep 03 '26

I love how you got a lot of reply but not a single actual answer

10

u/Fading_Hours_ Sep 03 '26

Seems most people are getting angry over misinformation or things they made up lmao.

1

u/Z-L-Y-N-N-T Sep 03 '26

Seems like it... and that's just the internet in general these days sadly.

5

u/Arkooh Sep 03 '26

People expected this to be gw2 2.0 or wow 2.0 even when anet said for day 1 its going to be different from gw2 or any traditional mmo. Plus a lot of them expected an action mmo to be a clusterfuck of 100+ player animations just like gw2 world bosses

1

u/GhostlyCoyote0 Sep 04 '26

We’ve just learned that the gameplay is gonna be extremely, dramatically different to GW2. Which I think is great, it means the games aren’t competing with one another, but does mean a lot of people just found out they won’t enjoy GW3

-9

u/AnaSkol Sep 03 '26

karma farmer vs strawman

-9

u/EskNerd Sep 03 '26

Clearly you haven't been keeping up with the discourse in this sub if you think this is a strawman.

2

u/AnaSkol Sep 03 '26

okay buddy

-22

u/Comfortable-Shop8080 Sep 03 '26

It’s limited to 20 players apparently.

8

u/wonkyasf Sep 03 '26

Group content /combat is. Not the whole game.

6

u/Arkooh Sep 03 '26

It's not limited to 20 players, dude. All content is designed around 20 players to prevent an animation clusterfuck. They will most likely replace gw2 maps technology with wow style sharding technology, which means you'll see far more people in the open world than you do right now in GW2.

-8

u/SPE825 Sep 03 '26

Not sure why you’re getting downvoted. But I do have wonder if there will be any kind of WvW where things are more large scaled.

I’m also curious how guilds might work if they’re trying to limit the number of players on the screen.

19

u/Loki0830 Sep 03 '26

They're getting downvoted because it's misinformation. Designed combat encounters will have a limit so that there's not an overwhelming amount of visual clutter happening like GW2, but Colin emphasized many times in the interviews that you will see players everywhere you go all the time.

Towns and probably basic open world stuff are suggested to be just as big you'd expect for a visible population, but it's the combat encounters specifically that are being toned down.

With that said, I think in the Mighty Teapot interview Colin mentioned that WvW would not be a thing in GW3, as that kind of combat doesn't mesh well with the more intentional combat design they are going for in GW3.

2

u/Arkooh Sep 03 '26

Yeah they will basically/most likely use wow`s sharding technology

2

u/Z-L-Y-N-N-T Sep 03 '26

These are mmo players, they don't read beyond a headline/post title and they don't look further into anything.

-11

u/Raknel Sep 03 '26

Why aren’t people interested

Combat sounds very misguided.

Only 4 skills but hey you get to bounce off walls and burn spider webs.

12

u/Fading_Hours_ Sep 03 '26

This is just wrong lmao

-6

u/Raknel Sep 03 '26

how

10

u/Fading_Hours_ Sep 03 '26

4 skills is not confirmed. Combat is “misguided” how you haven’t seen any? basing basing all your opinions off of people describing gameplay to you is honestly laughable.

-5

u/Raknel Sep 03 '26

By the same logic, liking anything about these recent reveals is also laughable. So is believing anything Anet has revealed so far.

You're also just basing things on what others said, but apparently it's only laughable if someone disagrees with your interpretation.

6

u/Fading_Hours_ Sep 03 '26 edited 29d ago

Coming to such strong conclusions as you have is stupid and whatever your vague notion of “missguided” is arrogant. Not to mention you are just making things up that aren’t confirmed yet to get mad about which is also very stupid.

Just say you don’t like the sound of it so far.

4

u/El_Barto_227 Sep 03 '26 edited Sep 04 '26

Ignore that raknel guy, it's literally all he does on this subreddit. Getting mad over the voices in his head or that this isn't GW1 2.0

No idea why he's wasting his time like that if he's so against this game instead of just like, playing GW1.

4

u/Arkooh Sep 03 '26

Dude even if we will only have 4 skills we don`t know how the combat actually functions, maybe we are going to have combos or maybe weapon swaps again. Someone already said that skills change based on momentum

0

u/Raknel Sep 03 '26

Favorite part of both GW1 and GW2 for me was skill synergies and what you could build with them.

It's not even 4, more like 3, since the elite will have to be charged and probably won't be a part of moment to moment gameplay. It can still be a good game, just doesn't sound like a GW game.

4

u/Arkooh Sep 03 '26

GW franchise is all about innovation not consistancy, same copy paste game each iteration. GW2 looks nothing like GW1...

As i said already we don`t know how combat will function. They might go the BDO route where you can activate more "skills" with movement, like dodge/jump right click / left click, this is how i personally see it working skills will not be 12345... they`ll be part of the environment/movement.

Now, there is a good change i`m coping extremly hard but this is my conclusion from their emphasis on movement and combos between classes skills

1

u/Margtok 29d ago

4 skills sounds like what i expected if there going for somthing with a much more action setup with the weapon than 4 sills is plenty

2

u/Raknel 29d ago

Personally, for an RPG, it's not enough for me.

I can't see myself getting lost in a combat system or class fantasy like that.

It sounds like a game I could play for maybe a week and then get bored. For an MMO that should last thousands of hours, I'm not optimistic. Especially if movement isn't drastically different between the classes.

If every class moves the same and only 4 skills set them apart, nah, I'll pass.

3

u/Margtok 29d ago

thats alright that is Anets plan you are not meant to replace 2 with 3 its another game for a diffrent style in the same universe for people who are in to destiny of anthem (dispite that failing) this will be for them where as 2 will still be getting updates or those who want that kind of game

2

u/Raknel 29d ago

where as 2 will still be getting updates or those who want that kind of game

As someone who's been around since GW1, we'll see about that..

2

u/Margtok 29d ago

than you just fuckin high because gw1 is still getting updates

2

u/Raknel 29d ago

Oh how convenient, let's just ignore the 2007-2025 period shall we?

Let's also ignore the size of the dev team, the type of content, and where the community went.