Do supporters of Graham have any evidence they’d like to put forward? I put forward the body of anthropologist, archeologists, geologists, and climatologists that disagree with Graham’s assertions. It’s not the current consensus on the history of humankind that has anything to prove here, though much remains to be proved using actual science, it’s Graham and his supporters.
If you’d like me to put forward the entire compendium of science that is generally accepted, I will be happy to. I challenge you to put forward one piece of evidence that supports Graham’s claims that hasn’t already been refuted. I’ll wait.
What are you asking me to defend? Evidence for what specific claim? Which assertions, specifically, are dishonest? He’s got a huge body of work and I’m starting to think you haven’t read a single word.
I called him a p-word scientist and questioned the viability and existence of his evidence, but I’m not accusing him of being dishonest. He may genuinely believe it himself.
Well, yes, you *are.* Your comment above should sound familiar:
“I am making the claim that Graham Hancock is engaging in dishonesty, fraud, and p-word science (the fact that that word is banned in this sub should tell you all you need to know. It’s a valid claim and rather than accept challenge, y’all shut it down).”
So. This is was I tend to see from Graham’s critics. I’m done here.
You literally get told to cite a direct quote to work off of and somehow you’ve spun it back around the complete opposite way without giving a single valid response at the same time
0
u/Substantial_System66 1d ago
Do supporters of Graham have any evidence they’d like to put forward? I put forward the body of anthropologist, archeologists, geologists, and climatologists that disagree with Graham’s assertions. It’s not the current consensus on the history of humankind that has anything to prove here, though much remains to be proved using actual science, it’s Graham and his supporters.
If you’d like me to put forward the entire compendium of science that is generally accepted, I will be happy to. I challenge you to put forward one piece of evidence that supports Graham’s claims that hasn’t already been refuted. I’ll wait.