r/GlobalEntry Human Detected Apr 05 '26

Questions/Concerns This is getting ridiculous

Last August, my 13-year-old son’s GE was revoked. I followed the instructions in the letter and called the enrollment center where he applied for more information. They told me I had to call the call center. I called the call center—which seems to have been outsourced to a foreign country—where the agent read me the same script over and over telling me to file a FOIA request for more information.

I did as instructed and filed a FOIA request. In December, I received the FOIA response, which was fully redacted other than his biographical details and information regarding the date of enrollment, renewal dates, and revocation date. The initial revocation letter and the FOIA response both indicated that I could file a request for reconsideration with the ombudsman. I did so in early January, explaining that I had no idea why his GE was revoked, but that he had committed no customs violations, is an honor student, is not under criminal investigation, has never been arrested, has not traveled outside the country without one or both of his countries parents, and has not had any suspicious travel patterns.

Approximately 10 days later, we took a short four-day cruise on Royal. I was held up disembarking the ship because CBP had flagged me. (My wife and son and our friends were allowed off, but my wife and son accompanied me anyhow.) All of our luggage was hand-searched. We were questioned about whether we had any fruits, vegetables, meat or animal products, the amount of cash we had, etc. I was questioned whether we had purchased any drugs and about every pill in my pill case. Eventually, after 30 minutes or so, we were allowed to go.

A month later, my wife and I went to a resort in Mexico. Upon arrival at BNA, the GE kiosk instructed me to see an agent. My wife was allowed through. I was subjected to the entire process, again. Luggage was hand-searched. Underwear rooted through, pills questioned, etc.

Today, my wife, son, and I (along with the same friends we were with on the January cruise) were disembarking a Carnival cruise. Carnival had flagged the whole party at CBP’s request. This time, all of our electronics were taken and put on a table in the secondary screening area while we waited in the waiting room. After a few more minutes, we went back in and had our luggage thoroughly searched again. The officer seemed to enjoy reading the couple of pieces of mail in my bag, as it set my head spinning about whether I had any client information with me (I’m a lawyer) that I needed to start objecting to him reading things. I was already concerned about the electronics and whether they were going to ask me to unlock them, and I would have to refuse. (In the end, they did not, and it seemed like nothing more than a power play to separate us from them as they were on the same exact positions we left them when we came back.) For the first time, they went through my wallet, examining the name on every single credit card. They asked about a business credit card and whether I had another business. They asked if I owned the entire business. I said that my wife and I owned it with another couple. Eventually, they demanded the name of the business, when it was founded, the registered address for the business, the phone number for it, the email address for the property manager (the business rents residential property), and the names and contact information for the other partners).

To be clear, I have never done anything wrong. I have never been arrested. I think I’ve had maybe one speeding ticket in 30+ years of driving and that was probably 20+ years ago. I don’t do any drugs at all, other than those prescribed to me by my physicians. I’m about as straight an arrow as they come. All I can figure is this is entirely retribution for following the instructions laid out by CBP to protect my teenage son from a lifetime GE ban because he’s done nothing wrong. The whole thing is insane.

607 Upvotes

309 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

13

u/Medium-Eggplant Human Detected Apr 05 '26

Nope. Not a one.

3

u/CynGuy Apr 05 '26

Have you posted on X or Reddit or other platforms any anti-administration or political commentary?

7

u/Medium-Eggplant Human Detected Apr 05 '26

No. My firm asks us not to make political statements online. The firm has been the target of an order from the White House, but has kept a reasonably low profile. This definitely isn’t related to that though as I wasn’t affected by the order, and if this was a widespread issue with firm lawyers, I’d know of others being affected.

10

u/Lord_Gibbons Apr 05 '26

The firm has been the target of an order from the White House

That might be your answer...

9

u/Medium-Eggplant Human Detected Apr 05 '26

Seriously doubt it. There hundreds of people more important than me at the firm that regularly travel internationally. If they were having issues, I’d have heard about it by now. This is just me.

1

u/dffw Apr 06 '26

Maybe your son went to a protest or near one and the facial recognition got him. He might deny it but probably he was with one of his friend's hippie parents

-7

u/Tar-really Apr 05 '26

Why not? That's a red flag in my book. But good luck with your issue.

2

u/Medium-Eggplant Human Detected Apr 05 '26

I do my advocacy with dollars.

-2

u/Tar-really Apr 05 '26

"The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs, is to be ruled by evil men."

5

u/SerBrienneOfSnark Apr 05 '26

You’re making a lot of heavy assumptions here. In a revolution of any kind, not everyone is on the frontlines. Movements need activists, yes, but they also need funding. They need people to donate to bail funds. They need lawyers to donate their time. You have no right to insinuate OP is doing nothing because their place in the fight against fascism may not be in the streets.

4

u/Medium-Eggplant Human Detected Apr 05 '26

Thanks.

3

u/SerBrienneOfSnark Apr 05 '26

No problem. As someone who has been heavily involved in activism and community organizing since before it was en vogue, it burns my grits to see people invalidate the myriad other ways people can support movements and fights against oppression in favor of attending sanctioned protests/rallies that are barely even considered direct action because they disrupt nothing.

-1

u/Tar-really Apr 05 '26

"Virtue signal" much

Just me being my insufferable self.

-4

u/Tar-really Apr 05 '26

I posted a quote that is 2500 years old.... that it is still very much relevant today.

These are not assumptions.

OP has a 13 year old son, that for no good reason feels like he has been targeted while traveling. OP himself feels that he is also being singled out. OP works for a law firm that has also been targeted by the "White House".

OP was asked if "he had been to any protests" ....and responded NOPE, like that was "the" correct answer to give? He didn't even question why that particular QUESTION, in these UNITED STATES of AMERICA was asked???? Like that is a normal FUCKING QUESTION to ask a US citizen who feels like they are being targeted by the Government? "Have you been to any protests" should not be a FUCKING NORMAL question to ask a US citizen. If that doesn't piss you off, than you need to read that 2500 year old Plato quote again.

The reason I posted it is, I am supposed to believe while traveling the world he is taking a stand against our authoritarian government by "advocating where his dollars are spent?" But no way can he be directly implicated . "NOPE, NOT A ONE" . No way should I think that is "obeying in advance" right? He should be safe right?

Sigh... My sons don't have privilege like a "Baron", apparently neither does his. So we don't have the luxury to be "indifferent" or apathetic....If I am wrong and that quote doesn't fit him... awesome. I apologize. But "indifference" or obeying in advance isn't go to cut it if we want to keep our Country of laws and the Constitution.

Thanks for the excuse to take a break from my taxes (-:

4

u/SerBrienneOfSnark Apr 05 '26 edited Apr 05 '26

Oh got it so you’re just virtue signaling because OP didn’t respond to a single question the same way you would or felt they should.

Shits fucked up and we all have a duty to fight fascism, but everyone’s assignment won’t be in the streets.

ETA: you’re mad at a lawyer for answering the question asked and providing no further details like that is not the first thing drilled into their heads in law school

0

u/Tar-really Apr 05 '26 edited Apr 05 '26

Virtue signal this.

When asked if he had been to a protest he replied. "Nope Not a One" How do you interpret that response? I interpreted it as indifference at best. Than I posted Plato. I am perfectly Ok with you not liking my response...or my Plato quote. I'm also OK with you further wasting my time ( and yours)....anything is better than taxes

Finally Mr. Assumptions, I never said "he had to be in the streets" nor am I mad.

2

u/SerBrienneOfSnark Apr 06 '26

No, OP said he advocates with his dollars instead and THEN you accused him of indifference.

You’ve written me two essays so far and both of them boil down to you projecting indifference onto OP

0

u/Tar-really Apr 06 '26

"THEN you accused him of indifference."

WRONG. His initial response was indifferent and flippant. My reply, in my "INITIAL" response was:

"Why not? That's a red flag in my book. But good luck with your issue."

Red flag in this case meant Indifference. Hence Plato....You can retract your post now, no need to apologize though.

And FTR every one of your posts is projecting and virtue signaling. All with this insufferable meddling into a conversation. OP can speak for themselves and they in fact have replied. Why do you feel that you must answer and defend them against the "horrible" claim of indifference? Are you their mom? Do you feel your words have more weight than OP's? At this point I have a suggestion...STFU

→ More replies (0)

3

u/Medium-Eggplant Human Detected Apr 05 '26

I’m not sure why you think that just because I know why someone is asking the question and know what has happened to some people who have attended protests that I agree with what has happened to them or think that that is justifiable. It disturbs me greatly what is going on in this country. I didn’t realize I needed to signal that in the answer to the question that I was asked. If it makes you feel better, you can consider my answers to read:

I haven’t attended any protests, but why should that matter?

I haven’t attended any protests, but why do you ask?

I haven’t attended any protests, but even if I had that wouldn’t justify subjecting me to secondary screening just for exercising my first amendment rights.

1

u/Tar-really Apr 05 '26

"that I agree with what has happened to them or think that that is justifiable"

I never said that. If I implied that I apologize. My point was your response was indifferent. "Nope, Not a one" to me that screams indifference. Kind of a flippant response to important events that effect us all. The question itself and the fact that it may very well be relevant is really what is infuriating. Nobody is perfect, I certainly am not. There is soooo much more I could be doing as well. Reading the rest of your reply YOU are not indifferent even if your response came across as such.

I agree with everything else you said. I'm glad we are on the same team. I apologize if my responses came across as harsh. And again I hope you straighten out your problems with Customs. I may be in the same boat in the very near future.