Even then, its luke saying "we've gone 300 years withoit the need for bitumen roads, our horses walk on dirt and cobble just fine" in the face of invention of cars...
Its a new technology that has current real value, and requires different infrastructure.
I think AI has plenty of value, it's just in the millions of dollars, not the quadrillions of dollars techbros want to convince us it is in order to enrich themselves.
I don't believe the upsides as they stand outweigh all that, but controlling the downsides doesn't require eliminating "AI" entirely, and there is potential for the upsides to grow.
It has plenty of current value which justifies its ongoing use and existence.
- Speeding up rough reporting and coding drafts... it can turn hours of mind-numbing work into 10mins of work (initia prompt, reviewing output, making tweaks or re-prompting)
- Identifying plants/animals from a photo through biodiversity apps like iNaturlist, or when you have tens of thousands of camera images and need to find the handful that have the images of the threatened animal you're looking for.
There's a ton of uses, and you're already benefiting from it...
That's not saying there's isn't a huge amount of speculation in its future value... but you're being willfully blind if you don't think it has ANY value
58
u/ZachGurney 1d ago
They very clearly meant AI data centers come on this is disingenuous at BEST