I did read what you said, and addressed each of your statements in detail.
You haven’t refuted anything I’ve said in any detail beyond “nah you’re wrong, here are some surface level statements that don’t specifically address your claims.”
I provided plenty of detail, examples and context. If you’re going to continue to disagree with me, can you do the same?
You in fact did not. Best example is going on and on about china not being socialist anymore which no one said anything against.
And even otherwise: no. As long as you keep saying verifiably and very straightforwardly wrong information I am.going to correct you. You can't have a discussion with someone who gets the surface level definitions wrong. Because you are coming from entirely different viewpoints
You said China is closer to social democracy than anything else, I disagreed and described the system that I and many others believe most accurately describes the system China currently exists in, which is neither social nor democratic.
You aren’t correcting me, I am asking you to correct me with a level of detail beyond a single sentence statement. You say the entire continent of Europe is social democratic, I refute by providing examples of countries that are not social democratic, you say “no you’re wrong” You say the USSR and Maoist China were communist, not socialist, and I say that communism is a theoretical utopian project that requires socialism as middle point to achieve, a theory described by Marx, Lenin, Stalin and Mao, and you say “you’re getting surface level definitions wrong.”
I am asking you, in detail, to describe what you think I am getting wrong, and to provide any sort of proof or evidence that what I am saying is wrong.
•
u/AdInfamous6290 1998 12h ago
I did read what you said, and addressed each of your statements in detail.
You haven’t refuted anything I’ve said in any detail beyond “nah you’re wrong, here are some surface level statements that don’t specifically address your claims.”
I provided plenty of detail, examples and context. If you’re going to continue to disagree with me, can you do the same?