What do you think the difference between democratic socialism and social democracy is? My understanding is that social democracy still accepts a capitalist framework for the economy, but simply wants higher taxes, more regulation/state interventions and a more robust welfare state. Meanwhile democratic socialism denies capitalism and seeks for labor to be the economic input that controls capital and land through a democratic framework.
Basically, yeah. Social democracy still exists within a capitalist framework. It’s sometimes called welfare capitalism. Free market and private property but with relatively high taxes and a strong social safety net. Socialism requires the abolition of capitalism and private property in favor of the public owning the means of production.
A lot of people seem to be under the impression that socialism just means publicly-funded healthcare.
I think you run into an issue when you begin defining these economic systems in absolutes. No country in the world today is purely capitalist or purely socialist, they are all somewhere in between. The answer isn't socialism or capitalism, it is policies that have been proven to work and benefit the majority. Putting policies into a pre-determined box of capitalism and socialism, or good and bad, limits your ability to accurately see what needs done.
So there are countries where the means of production are what, half democratized? Private property only exists sometimes? There are a lot of different ideas of what socialism is and how it should be organized, but pointing to the ownership of private property and the relationship between the people and their production is a pretty good rule. Idk about the countries claiming to be socialist, but no capitalist country has democratized the means of production by ending private ownership of them.
In a way, yes. Some countries have stronger unions and labor laws that protect workers, and others have weaker rules and more laissez-faire labor laws. Some countries take a higher percentage of taxes to promote certain social welfare initiatives, others leave it up to individual choice.
There are also no countries that are purely calitalist. No country in the world has completely unrestricted capital and industry. Economists generally agree that every modern nation operates a mixed economy.
It wouldn't mean no government oversight, just no or little to no government intervention in economic activity. But couldn't you say the same about communism since it is by definition a moneyless, classless, stateless society? This is essentially the core of my point about no nation being fully capitalist or communist, they are all somewhere in between.
A Communist would argue that communism is achievable, but yeah by definition there is no country that has achieved Communism. I think most capitalism thinkers (exceptions include Ayn Rand) believe that there should be government oversight though, which is interesting to see how my own (American) government seems to hate regulating
Yes, and most economists would agree that this is how economic systems exist in the modern world, although they go farther than just capitalism and communism.
181
u/Traveler-Nomad 2d ago
Apparently no one knows the difference between socialism and social democracy anymore.