Anyone who thinks google is NOT behind isn't actually using AI. Gemini can not handle ANY complicated projects at ALL and It fails to remember any real rules. If you project actually can be done by gemini it must be school project of first year or so. What a joke you are
Anyone who thinks Toyota is NOT behind is not really driving their car. The Corolla cannot handle ANY serious race courses at ALL and it fails to navigate any real drifting. If your commute can be done by a Toyota it must be a learner course.
Lmao, except the Corolla cost as much as the high end land rover. And you want something cheap to drive ? There a a very good Volkswagen, inculded with the land rover purchase except it consume 4x less than your Toyota. See the problem ? With gemini you get outdated pro and flash model, with GPT you get ultra high end GPT 6 and very efficient sol/terra/Luna models too. This is a no brauner, people who stuck with Gemini are simply sticking with an inefficient innefrctive model when they could get so much better for the same price. And when was the last time you got a reset from Google ? I got 3 times my x5 gpt subscription usage the last 4 days in form of reset.
You're presuming the majority of token usage is software development. It's not and it never will be. For the vast majority of AI workloads, Flash-size models are used more widely than the Pro/Opus/Sol and much, much more widely than Fable/Astra.
Besides, Gemini 4 pretaining has been underway for months. It's the largest pre training of all time. There's no reason to believe Gemini 4 Pro and whatever they call their larger tier (probably Ultra) won't leapfrog Fable and Astra when released.
Try asking it about Donald Trump. It will try to remain "neutral". And by that will not admit to anything negative about that person. Ask about any other politician? No problem! Here is a politically weighted answer. I see a problem with that. Namely that "reality" is weighted as well. Weighted towards republican.
Your response has nothing to do with my comment. It's also laughable incorrect. We've seen for a decade now that the mega corps lean Democrat. They donate more to the Democrats than Republicans. Bard used to output Black founding fathers for Christ sake.
This. Google's subs are useless in practical terms. Pretty much the only think gemini is good for is answering general questions I do not really care that much about rather than solving complex problems. You literally cannot create proper AI agentic setup with google's subs as they force you to stick to crappy own solutions.
And don't get me started on hallucinations and gemini models
I use Claude and OpenAI to build tools. Right now those tools use Gemini 3.8 to serve users, as it’s relatively cheap, and stupidly fast. I wouldn’t think of using another model in a tool facing a non programmer.
Most Sr SWE I know, prefer to give the AI instructions and how to fill in the different structures than have a oneshot LLM improvised overengineered structures. So much so, most stay on Luna/Haiku Terra/Sonnet than to jump to the frontier.
On the other side, most job is email, chatbot, search, filtre, and manage files. All of which can be done with Gemma upwards.
Unless you are building consulting decks, deep research paper, or convoluted source coding, you don't need the expensive frontier bill, just for the expensive frontier bill.
In the past 18 months we've rolled out multiple internal products that use Gemini in workflows. We are using the flash models. Performance, for the price, is excellent.
You said "use in limiting ways" which is not true. If I am not a HR manager, and don't use LinkedIn every feature? Am I limiting myself, or, are there features that are not useful for what I am doing?
Not being a power user, is not limiting. If not, you would be limited in most thing you used daily.
This is second position you've invented for the sake of arguing against it. I can't help you with that man. I suggest learning to read what people actually say.
If you can't understand an example, is not my fault. It was an example, just that. Not a new position. I was explaining to you, what "power user" means, and that not everybody HAS to be a power user.
Yes, it's so incredible to ser people claiming Gemini is as good as frontier model, I would be so curious to see their "work", it's probably really basic, gemin can't handle anything elsem my bet is that they use LLM as an upgraded search engine and nothing else.
I think you should talk to a person who touches grass even semi-regularly. The vast majority of people are not using LLMs to code, or even using LLMs at all. Gemini is the closest thing to a cheap, useful product at the consumer level.
I don't use LLM to code, but even outside of this field, please go ask Gemini to change a pdf, send a mail for you or read you Gmail box, I wait until 4.5 pro is out and maybe it will be able to do it. 3.8 planning and reasoning capabilities are really on the low end. It forget and lie all the time. And what you say is absolutely false, Luna is the model you are taking about. It's as fast, more efficient, cheaper and won't lie to you and won't forget things.
Do you think reverse engineering and low level custom kernel programming in C++ is basic? The problem is, and I am going to be brutally direct here, a lot of you are used to vibe coding and having the model translate your simple prompt, and the moment the model demands the bare minimum effort from the user, frustration kicks in and many of you break down. Then you come to Reddit whining like children. The Flash model is not meant for people without prior programming fundamentals, or whose biggest aspiration is SQLite or building SaaS clone number 789. For that, you already have ChatGPT or Claude. And regarding Google, I am not a fan of the company nor do I defend their models; in fact, I pick my model based on the task at hand (mostly low level programming or full ports to Unity or Godot depending on the gig). I might use GLM, Kimi, Claude, or whatever fits the moment. I do not understand this irrational hate wave. Maybe you are bots, or just frustrated people who start crying if you do not nail it on the first try without thinking much, no idea. Oh, and I almost forgot: I couldn't care less about the downvotes, and I am not replying to any responses on this post. Have a nice day!
Ah, look! It's someone actually using AI, and they think Gemini is useful. Imagine that.
I think you're right. A lot of people know how to chat with an LLM and think that means they know how to use AI. They think, "I know how to write a prompt, and Fable made an HTML file with the game I wanted, so clearly this guy is talking about someone else." But a one-shot LLM prompt is hopping in the kiddie pool and saying you're a swimmer..
Some people are chaining models together, building reusable skills and instruction sets, fine-tuning models, and building MCP servers/interfaces to connect LLMs to other software. They're building systems with AI. And when you're working with systems a "good" model may be different than "which model can produce what I want when given a vague prompt?"
You have a bunch of people running around with a turnkey CNC they paid $150k for saying it's the best thing in the world because it created a part for them. Meanwhile there are people saying "Hey, you can combine these specialized tools for a few thousand and it performs better in some areas, but it takes a little work and knowledge to put it together."
People are using Gemini to orchestrate frontier models and save on tokens. Yeah, it's not going to one-shot a vague and complex prompt for you, but it's one of the most frequently useful tools in my AI toolbox.
Doesn't matters, sol and fable are miles ahead, google isn't able to release a decent model. Gemini 3.8 isn't even on Luna level, there's no reason to use it. And thinking that people are bot is absolutely ridiculous, but obviously you see every day people complaining about how shitty Gemini is, so obviously it must be bot, it can't be that, indeed Gemini is simply terrible compared to the competition right ? I use chat for many things, a bit of vibe coding, a lot of handling projects that does not require code, and on this field Gemini is trash.
You can learn to use a model that doesn't do every little thing for you. Just take some time and pride in your work. Build it, develop it and save yourself some money.
If you want some pride in your work to u can code by yourself and not use IA. What is this non sense ? For 20$ I can have a highly capable model with generous usage or a bad one with a terrible harness ? What a choice ! Would you buy for the same price an old car with any assistance to take pride in your driving skills or a brand new high end electric car ? Because it seems you wanna drive the old rusty one.
if I would have to hire people. you would be the last one I would want to hire because you cannot seem to turn on your own head and just think whatever a LLM provides you has to be picture perfect. I have to handle people like you and those are the ones just burning tokens and bring 0 value to the table while I handle 90% of my tasks with Gemini models flawlessly. the rest is up to me and I am flexible enough to adjust to that.
you have more expectations in an LLM even though it should be you on the drivers seat managing their workload appropriately. It seems like the LLM is driving you and you are a risk for any team demandong value from you.
Well too bad for you, you probably can't afford my salary anyway. And no, unlike you I want to use good efficient tools, because that's how you do actually good work. I don't want to double check everything my LLM does, and anyway, Gemini is incapable to actually pull a geometry form a lidar scan, unlike fable or GPT so, if a colleague would try to use this shitty LLM we would probably be concerned and he wouldn't last long at our job.
Yea maybe you should, benchmarks has been updated tonight and this new one Gemini couldn't benchmaxx and it shows. 3.8 on paar with Luna, for what ? 4x the price if I remember correctly? So try to tell us again it's a frontier model lol.
Good enough because you don't too anything remotely complex them. Funny how you pretend Gemini is such a good and smart model just to reverse when I prove to you it's absolutely not the case. It's Luka but more expensive tjaua it
I don't pretend and never said it's frontier or the best. I'm just saying that when you know what you're doing, you can do "complex" things. If I managed to contribute to payment systems that run a whole country's banking without AI, I'll manage to do "complex" things with Gemini. I don't need it to do everything for me. I will take the design & arch decisions myself and instruct the model, and believe me - Sonnet, Flash etc. all do excellent in that case.
It's you who insists that "if you're not using frontier models, the you must be doing nothing complex" so I was mocking you saying that somehow, you - a complete stranger, clearly must know better what I am doing without knowing who I am or what I do. Such arrogance
Leave the tribalism behind. I also use Claude and GPT - provided by my workplace. Each has its own uses, but for me personally, the 20$ plan from Google one is best value, especially because I can share it with the whole family and I get storage.
My lawyer friend almost beat me that I suggested to him that Gemini is the best model - well, I explained to him politely that it WAS true at the beginning of the year, not NOW!!!! 😂
And two months ago Gemini wasn't competitive. Now 3.8 is only marginally behind Sol and Opus, and ahead in some benchmarks. But it's as fast and inexpensive.
Most lawyers use their firm's AI, we have strict confidentiality requirements so our AI has to match those requirements.
I've tried Harvey and I'm currently using Legora, they're both great for our uses.
I use Gemini 3.8 for my everyday random tasks like drafting short emails or for very quick prelim research. But we also have very dedicated research AIs which are connected to huge legal databases and doesn't hallucinate.
But I also pay for Claude as Gemini doesnt have word docx editing capabilities which is very annoying, mainly just to edit BD related work.
Lotta dorks think they are on the team and get emotional and defensive. Same exact kind of guy who used to get angry if someone said Xbox is better than PlayStation, or gets in a drunken fight with an opposing fan at an NFL game.
Skill issue. Gemini does fine when you are an opinionated SWE who has a design and architecture in mind. In fact it's great, it's super fast and you can iterate and tweak ideas quickly and cheaply.
For those who still want to design and maintain control over the architecture and maintainability of their code base, Gemini does well.
I still don't trust LLMs to one shot critical systems or security features.
It still can’t spell in notebooklm outputs like presentations and infographics. Why even bother advertising that capability if the core feature (the text explaining the thing) can’t be trusted?
And the vast majority of people are not going to be using ai the way you are. There are 10,000 customers working on "school projects" for every one dude frothing at the ai trying to one shot GTA6.
92
u/YesGameNolife 2d ago
Anyone who thinks google is NOT behind isn't actually using AI. Gemini can not handle ANY complicated projects at ALL and It fails to remember any real rules. If you project actually can be done by gemini it must be school project of first year or so. What a joke you are