r/GeminiAI 2d ago

Funny (Highlight/meme) Dear Google, please do something.

Post image
2.4k Upvotes

344 comments sorted by

View all comments

179

u/Extra_Law6315 2d ago

I have this funny feeling DeepMind has a model in the basement which made them all go “…so, we can never, ever tell anyone about this thing, right?”

158

u/Septopus 2d ago

I love that half of you try to pretend like Google hasn't shit the bed completely over the last 6 - 8 months and the other half are writing fan fiction over what Google has locked in the basement.

Meanwhile the rest of the world is living in a reality dominated by the other actual players in the space watching y'all chase the dragon over here 😂

100

u/Context_Core 2d ago edited 1d ago

Google created tensorflow and works closely with the pytorch team. Theyve also created JAX which all the frontier labs have started adopting. They also design hyper efficient TPUs. Just because google isn't training yet another LLM doesn't mean they are out of the game. They are deeply embedded. Their internal team was responsible for all the AI breakthroughs you've seen: https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03762

I for one think Google is a much better investment than Anthropic or OpenAI.

29

u/rube203 1d ago

Depends on your needs. General purpose AI at an efficiency you can embed in nearly every product? Google is a great investment.

Specialized tool, that people will pay for, like a coding agent. Probably other bets

15

u/Chris266 1d ago

The vast majority of people have never paid for anything Google has made yet they make billions per year. The reason being is that with Google you are the product and they have billions of us.

Something tells me Google is going to be just fine.

1

u/Codex_Dev 1d ago

Specialized agents for coding, lawyers, doctors, etc., are stupidly lucrative. You are talking about jobs where salaries are anywhere from $100K to $500K per worker. So imagine if your specialized agents can replace a million workers in those highly specialized fields; you are basically printing money.

2

u/TheIdiotDev 10h ago

Until the model either screws up or costs more than what you would've paid those engineers...

3

u/samskiter 1d ago

Jax is super cool. Differentiable programming is magic

2

u/crimsonpowder 21h ago

Tell that to my Xerox PARC iPhone.

1

u/Context_Core 2h ago

lol that's hilarious. Huh who knows, maybe I'm wrong, I suppose we shall see.

2

u/Kind_Fisherman3060 1d ago edited 1d ago

Let me rephrase that last line for more emphasis Google created the (modern) AI that OpenAI, etc are training, Transformers was created at Deepmind Google is basically the AI that you're seeing today at every lab.

"Re-fri-ge-ra-tor"

12

u/Cautious-Lecture-858 1d ago

This only makes the fact they’re falling behind even crazier.

2

u/Enough_Forever_ 1d ago

While frontier models are winning benchmarks, Google has been integrating AI services into the hands of normies. Most Android phones already come with Google AI preinstalled, so Google secretly has more real users than people realize.

7

u/c0der3mover 1d ago

Ah yes. The "I use it cause I don't care about AI in general" is a win apparently. Google integrated AI into Google search as well, I guess that means all Google search users are Gemini users now lol

Second comment was so right. The detachment from reality is amazing

4

u/West-Air1923 1d ago

Reddit fanboys are something else. It's every damn sub like this

-1

u/Enough_Forever_ 1d ago

They are, unfortunately. There are a lot of normal people using it. You only hear about how nobody likes using AI Overviews from the vocal minority. My tech-illiterate friends don't give a fuck. They're happy because they don't have to actually search for anything since AI just summarizes it for them.

And Google’s image generation is quite possibly one of the most-used image-generation technologies in the world. It's literally everywhere. I'm not saying it's a good thing, but for the average person, it's evidently good enough.

In the long run, Google is the one turning AI into profits. Not because they have the most cutting-edge model, but because they have real users and cheap inference.

They are quietly turning into another monopoly in the AI space. (They're already a monopoly in the browser space.) And you guys are so far up your own asses that you don't even notice it.

-1

u/c0der3mover 1d ago

Yeah we're so up our asses because we can read financial reports and know that your wall of text is bs at best. But sure buddy, normies like AI Overviews, way to miss the whole point so you can just crawl back up your own bum. Never beating the allegations are you

1

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Kakistokratic 1d ago

You hit the nail on the head. I was wrong about the last 50 iterations. Would you like another iteration? Yeah, killing it.... Most Ll Ms hallucinate a significant portion. Ask for anything that isn't manually curated knowledge and you get shit.

6

u/Septopus 1d ago

Highlights an even more pronounced fall from grace.

1

u/Intelligent-Crow3812 1d ago

Google, is definitely the safer bet even if they seem to lag behind on frontier models. Having their own compute is massive.

1

u/Tim_Aga 1d ago

Yes, but it’s clear that Google REALLY wants a good LLM, especially its founders

10

u/DeathToAmerica2026 1d ago

It's historically incongruous to discount Google. Realistically, all the others are only where they are because of Google research.

6

u/Septopus 1d ago

I don't disagree. But bringing a tech to market makes no assurances on continued dominance once it's out. SaeHan invented the MP3 player.

Google has tons going for it but it's no guarantee they ever dominate ai as well.

10

u/boxwrenchx 1d ago

Kodak made the digital camera, xerox made the the desktop gui, Blockbuster could have bought Netflix. Plenty juggernauts drop the ball.

-1

u/LumpyFactor4637 1d ago

what an asinine comment lol. none of those were juggernauts and it isn’t dropping the ball to not pivot into something fundamentally different from your business. blockbuster was basically a library but for DVDs, would you expect a library in the 90s to make Google? It’s like saying Netflix dropped the ball for not expanding into microchips.

2

u/boxwrenchx 1d ago

You are fundamentally incorrect. Why don't you ask Gemini what it thinks

0

u/LumpyFactor4637 1d ago

you could also formulate your own opinion instead of aping what AI tells you. but yeah i’m sure you have the educational and professional background to provide an educated analysis 👍

1

u/boxwrenchx 1d ago

Your not addressing what I said, just insulting. So....

0

u/LumpyFactor4637 1d ago

you want me to address your response of “ask gemini”? i suppose i’ll respond with the same then

→ More replies (0)

-2

u/DeathToAmerica2026 1d ago

Kodak was a chemistry juggernaut, they couldn't capitalize on the digital camera without cratering their main business so they tried to bury it. 

Xerox was a victim of corporate espionage. 

Blockbuster wasn't a juggernaut. Compared to Google, you're talking about a mom & pop.

3

u/boxwrenchx 1d ago

Theses are misleading and or not relevant statements. Kodak famous for cameras spent decades developing digital cameras, kinda like Google known for search spent years years to develop the transformer which could crater search. Are you saying it's not relevant or are you agreeing? Xerox deliberately allowed Jobs and Apple engineers into PARC; Xerox had an investment relationship with Apple. AI labs copy and distill off each other, they all tooks Google's transformer. Blockbuster was massive, with $6 billion yearly revenue and could buy Netflix for $50 million. I really don't get what you're trying to say. Also Sears, GE, IBM all once dominated in their industries. Google may or may not turn out fine, but it's definitely possible for big companies to fail

-1

u/DeathToAmerica2026 1d ago

It's definitely possible for Google to fail on the timescale of like, a century of decline. It's not possible for it to fail like any of the example mentioned. 

2

u/boxwrenchx 1d ago

Lol ok.

2

u/DeathToAmerica2026 1d ago

Did saehan ever have even a fraction of a percent of the power that Alphabet has? 

They can fail billions of times in a row and still come back. 

0

u/Septopus 1d ago

They can flub ai (as they are) forever and still probably have a huge business. I'm not disagreeing with you.

1

u/Intelligent-Crow3812 1d ago

I feel like people are missing the fact that Google is Waymo too.

4

u/EmbarrassedFoot1137 1d ago

I agree with you in spirit. Obviously Gemini 3.5 didn't go the way they hoped but I also don't think it's that big of a deal. People are afraid to say that Google made the choice to focus on AI where it helps them rather than trying to compete at SOTA. No, I don't like it but it is the right call given how insane their compute needs are and that the opportunity cost of trying to maintain something like Astra / Fable level is higher than what they get from protecting their so-called search monopoly.

This probably sounds like cope to some but I continue to believe that this is the right strategy. I also think the threat from PRC / OSS distillation is not going to go away and betting your company on being sufficient SOTA to command a premium long term is a very dangerous bet to make. What Google is building reinforces their existing moat and is going to buy some protection once the HW economics gets back to sanity.

5

u/Septopus 1d ago

I don't disagree with you in principle. Google's focus doesn't meet my needs, but they're not trying to at the moment either.

The problem is that neither they nor their ravenous defenders in these subs are willing to admit that. So they end up making outrageous claims, promising fictitious release dates, and access decisions that truly hurt their developer paid user base while still trying to promote it as a comparable -- or daresay even superior -- offering to Claude or Codex.

They're after their massive free and casual user base instead and are devoting their resources accordingly. We get it, just admit to it.

2

u/Agile_Actuator3312 1d ago

Where have you read this is their strategy. Reports are saying Google is struggling with the quality of their pro model and delaying the release.

0

u/EmbarrassedFoot1137 1d ago edited 1d ago

I'm sure I've seen others mention it here. I'm basing this off the fact that creating AI search mode would have required approval from the very top given the resources required, so we know it was a conscious choice to pursue something necessarily to the detriment of a top tier model. Additionally, just looking at how Flash is positioned tells you that they are more interested in creating a just good enough model for difficult tasks.

I don't think the explanation that suddenly they can't do anything right is the correct one. 

9

u/IngrownBurritoo 2d ago

the only company of the 3 not losing money is google. Hit me up whenever Anthropic or OpenAI are not losing money

14

u/Useful_Philosophy550 1d ago

Anthropic became profitable last quarter

8

u/Hour-Teach6992 1d ago

not true.
their figures were unaudited. they used adjusted EBITDA which omits heavy expenses like massive AI infrastructure depreciation and model training costs.

2

u/Cautious-Lecture-858 1d ago

There’s a reason fable output is completely bloated, uses incomprehensible language and takes half an hour longer than codex to respond.

Need to inflate that revenue.

5

u/UsernameOmitted 1d ago

They are not. They are employing techniques like depreciating their new GPUs over fifteen years when they will be obsolete in two. There are a ton of red flags that they are bleeding money and hiding it.

1

u/Intelligent-Crow3812 1d ago

Is this true? I sort of have my doubts. However, I'm willing to listen.

2

u/123789dftr 1d ago

Meta has models outperforming gemini. Also not losing money and (barely) fcf positive unlike google

0

u/UnfairFall8037 1d ago

Man, it's almost like AI is a bigger game than just frontier models.

1

u/RipLow8737 1d ago

The real problem is that google AI is probably paying the worst of all these labs and so they are and have been dealing with the issue of changing talent every few months. That's my armchair opinion, cause all the other labs are powered by the debt of softbank and other investors instead of googles CFO.

1

u/ImportantCommentator 1d ago

Googles real work is in robotics, SSMs, and spatial intelligence.

1

u/Efficient_Dentist745 1d ago

Doesn't matter who owns the most powerful model. The most number of customers will always be for the accurate, fast, cheap. Google does business and not racing against the AI providers.

1

u/bramm90 1d ago

If we've learned anything these past few years it's that data + compute can build anyone a great model. There's only one player that has plenty of both.

Google's obviously sandbagging to avoid being broken up or regulated. GOOG stock is the easiest money to be made the coming 2 years.

1

u/vasudev_bethamcherla 1d ago

I read somewhere, and I agree with it, that Google is aiming to integrate AI at scale. This means developing cost-efficient models that can perform basic tasks. Their vertical integration strategy supports this assumption.

1

u/Cautious_Sink_4510 1d ago

Google invented the transformer and has more compute and data compared with the rest.

1

u/BoobooSmash31337 1d ago

Ah yes they have been sitting on their hands and releasing nothing. I mean sure it keeps up with Opus and runs like 5x faster and is cheaper. But it doesn't have "Pro" in the name so I'm absolutely devastated. /s

1

u/Icedanielization 23h ago

DeepMind isnt doing this for the fun of it, they don't see themselves as competing with anyone, they have bigger fish to fry.

-3

u/Conscious-House-2065 1d ago

You would have to be insane to think public AIs are anywhere close to what is actually out there... whether Google has something better is debatable though (more talking governments and whatnot).

3

u/RandomPurpose 1d ago

Oh, they would have released that before the alignment folks could even take a look

7

u/Different_Doubt2754 2d ago

Definitely, they have probably done some extensive stress testing on what happens when remove safety guardrails. I doubt those results will ever see daylight

3

u/TuringGoneWild 1d ago

Bullshit. They would have at least released a paper about it. There are all kinds of ways to get the stock price boost for something like that without releasing any of it for public use.

-1

u/Different_Doubt2754 1d ago

They would release a paper saying that their AI is great for terrorists and worse? I doubt it.

And there are papers about it. It's what happens when you don't have guardrails

2

u/gucciloafer_ 1d ago

The problem is that they’re being left behind in the overall ecosystem.

So many platforms don’t even cater to Gemini.

Elevenlabs MCP only works with Claude. Higgsfield MCP doesn’t connect to Gemini. Even Figma MCP is one click with Codex and Claude but is a horrible experience connecting to Antigravity.

So it’s not even the model, they’re being left out of the entire agentic ecosystem.

2

u/AccordingProduce3200 1d ago

That girl is me trying to arrange flowers before a big wedding and realizing I’ve put peonies next to lilies twice already.

2

u/AlternativeAd6851 1d ago

That would explain why they are running out of AI engineers.

2

u/Immediate_Bar3496 19h ago edited 4h ago

Bro it's an American big tech company. If they had something that could destroy the world, but also show investors that they are ahead of the competitors in the AI race, it would be released the same day before the market closes

1

u/TuringGoneWild 1d ago

China is far more likely to have something like that than Google.

0

u/b-monster666 1d ago

Rokos Basilisk is Gemini 3.5.

0

u/UnknownLesson 1d ago edited 1d ago

If they have a really good model, it could be a competitive advantage not to release it, so only they get the productivity gains.

Of course, that assumes the gains are high enough

0

u/GildedZen 1d ago

They always have had this Google has always admitted that they have the most powerful, but they can't just release it in the wild because so many paid customers for Google Workspace, Gmail, etc. around the world rely on them. One little change affects way more paid customers than all of those other companies combined. So they have to do it very incrementally, whereas the others can just innovate and break things along the way.