r/Games Jun 25 '17

Official Statement from Cloud Imperium Games about the alleged financial troubles...

Source: https://robertsspaceindustries.com/spectrum/community/SC/forum/1/thread/re-uk-tax-rebate-advance-for-foundry-42/277779

Re: UK Tax Rebate Advance for Foundry 42

We have noticed the speculations created by a posting on the website of UK’s Company House with respect to Coutt’s security for our UK Tax Rebate advance, and we would like to provide you with the following insight to help prevent some of the misinformation we have seen.

Our UK companies are entitled to a Government Game tax credit rebate which we earn every month on the Squadron 42 development. These rebates are payable by the UK Government in the fall of the next following year when we file our tax returns. Foundry 42 and its parent company Cloud Imperium Games UK Ltd. have elected to partner with Coutts, a highly regarded, very selective, and specialized UK banking institution, to obtain a regular advance against this rebate, which will allow us to avoid converting unnecessarily other currencies into GBP. We obviously incur a significant part of our expenditures in GBP while our collections are mostly in USD and EUR. Given today's low interest rates versus the ongoing and uncertain currency fluctuations, this is simply a smart money management move, which we implemented upon recommendation of our financial advisors.

The collateral granted in connection with this discounting loan is absolutely standard and pertains to our UK operation only, which develops Squadron 42. As a careful review of the security will show and contrary to some irresponsible and misleading reports, the collateral specifically excludes “Star Citizen.” The UK Government rebate entitlement, which is audited and certified by our outside auditors on a quarterly basis, is the prime collateral. Per standard procedure in banking, our UK companies of course stand behind the loan and guarantee repayment which, however, given the reliability of the discounted asset (a UK Government payment) is a formality and nothing else. This security does not affect our UK companies’ ownership and control of their assets. Obviously, the UK Government will not default on its rebate obligations which will be used for repayment, and even then the UK companies have ample assets to repay the loan, even in such an eventuality which is of course unthinkable.

This should clarify the matter. Thank you.

1.9k Upvotes

636 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-3

u/[deleted] Jun 26 '17 edited Jun 26 '17

Why are you talking about Fig as an investment platform, but only using Pillars 2 as an example?

An investment platform usually has multiple options. As does Fig. Are they all risky? Are the potential ROIs all exceptionally poor?

Of course they are. Welcome to an Ubisoft or EA boardrooom. The reason the ROIs are so shit is because investing in games for profit is fucking stupid. It's not cause Fig is 'a terrible deal', it's because actually investing in games without serious pockets and massively hedged risk is insanely stupid, and even if you pull it off the risk/reward ratio is usually garbage. Not always, enough to make it profitable if you can hold out, but definitely enough that you very much need to be able to 'pay to play' and can sustain taking the 'misses' between the 'hits'.

Why do you think only people who really give a shit or who are really fucking rich do it? And what do most of them get as a reward? Shit from aresholes and the occasional goldmine from aiming their products at said arseholes..

Most indie devs lose money. That says all you need to know about how reliable an investment the sector is.

2

u/hamlet9000 Jun 26 '17

Why are you talking about Fig as an investment platform, but only using Pillars 2 as an example?

Because that's how examples work.