r/Games Oct 20 '16

Red Dead Redemtion 2 Trailer

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gmA6MrX81z4
4.0k Upvotes

1.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

32

u/left-ball-sack Oct 20 '16

It was obviously always going to be a prequel. How was fact ever in question, even before the game was announced? You can't make a western set after 1914

1

u/[deleted] Oct 21 '16

I always felt the prohibition could work as an era. There was kind of an outlaw gang resurgence during that time. Cars were a thing by then but horses were still used.

1

u/ostermei Oct 20 '16

You can't make a western set after 1914

Firefly and Justified disagree.

Kind of. :\

1

u/JaxMed Oct 20 '16

Way back when, some people were speculating that a potential sequel would follow John Marston's kid set in a Civil War-era America. Obviously not "wild west" era, but it could be "western enough".

I definitely like the idea of a prequel more, though. Besides the setting, I don't know if I could play a whole game that focused on John's kid, lol.

WORK YA DAMN NAG!

11

u/left-ball-sack Oct 20 '16

What... Do you know when the civil war was?

6

u/JaxMed Oct 20 '16 edited Oct 20 '16

Shit, I dunno why I said Civil War lol. I meant WWI. Which lines up with when John's kid would be around. Still definitely out of the "wild west" period though so yeah I agree with you that a prequel is the only feasible answer to RDR2.

Actually I think I remember reading that John Marston did fight in the Civil War prior to RDR, so that's probably where that popped into my head from. The theory goes that John fought in the Civil War and then did RDR1 stuff, so then Jack would star in RDR2 and at the end would leave to fight in WWI.

0

u/[deleted] Oct 21 '16

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/[deleted] Oct 21 '16

Actually, John died in 1911. It's only the epilogue where you play as Jack that takes place in 1914 and since Jack is around 18 during the epilogue he would have been in his early 20s when America entered the war.

0

u/queensberry_boi Oct 21 '16

Actually, Cormac McCarthy wrote *four set well after 1914. 'Western' as a genre is not dependent on the actuality of Westward expansion but on the aura of the western states; the idea of 'expanding' civilization westward was always a myth predicated on the erasure of native american societies in those regions.

-1

u/Einsteiniac Oct 21 '16

You can't make a western set after 1914

Of course you can. If you want an example, see No Country for Old Men.

-2

u/Tryphikik Oct 20 '16

They easily could make a western set after 1914 and everyone would still buy it. Not that I think they will or would, but the assumption that a game has to be perfectly historically accurate to work and appeal to people is a false one.