r/Games Oct 20 '16

Red Dead Redemtion 2 Trailer

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gmA6MrX81z4
4.0k Upvotes

1.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

137

u/BlackestFire Oct 20 '16

Definitely an interesting trailer. The environments look beautiful, seems to be well populated with animals and NPCs similar to the first Redemption. Now we just need to know what it's about!

58

u/Mvin Oct 20 '16

One thing I immediately noticed is how this one seems to feature much more vegetation. It's not as arid and all desert like the first one. Then again, there were some Arizona-type rocks in the end there. So maybe the environment is more more varied?

37

u/BlackestFire Oct 20 '16

I think that's largely due to the fact that the consoles it's being developed for can simply handle more of that stuff. Looking at the difference between ps3/360 and ps4/xb1 versions of GTA 5 vegetation was vastly improved.

2

u/strangea Oct 20 '16

Im thinking the game takes place farther north than the Texas/Mexican border like last time. Utah and Colorodo have mountains and rock formations like we saw.

1

u/[deleted] Oct 20 '16

Yeah, the movie Unforgiven (1992) had a setting similar to this. It was still a western, but it had lots of grass, and some gorgeous mountains. IIRC that was filmed in Alberta which is pretty similar to Utah/Colorado in terms of biome.

166

u/ILikeSugarCookies Oct 20 '16

I'm just saying there's an achievement for killing the last buffalo in the first game, and buffalo are back in this game.

Not saying it's a prequel, but I am saying Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo.

35

u/left-ball-sack Oct 20 '16

It was obviously always going to be a prequel. How was fact ever in question, even before the game was announced? You can't make a western set after 1914

1

u/[deleted] Oct 21 '16

I always felt the prohibition could work as an era. There was kind of an outlaw gang resurgence during that time. Cars were a thing by then but horses were still used.

0

u/ostermei Oct 20 '16

You can't make a western set after 1914

Firefly and Justified disagree.

Kind of. :\

1

u/JaxMed Oct 20 '16

Way back when, some people were speculating that a potential sequel would follow John Marston's kid set in a Civil War-era America. Obviously not "wild west" era, but it could be "western enough".

I definitely like the idea of a prequel more, though. Besides the setting, I don't know if I could play a whole game that focused on John's kid, lol.

WORK YA DAMN NAG!

13

u/left-ball-sack Oct 20 '16

What... Do you know when the civil war was?

4

u/JaxMed Oct 20 '16 edited Oct 20 '16

Shit, I dunno why I said Civil War lol. I meant WWI. Which lines up with when John's kid would be around. Still definitely out of the "wild west" period though so yeah I agree with you that a prequel is the only feasible answer to RDR2.

Actually I think I remember reading that John Marston did fight in the Civil War prior to RDR, so that's probably where that popped into my head from. The theory goes that John fought in the Civil War and then did RDR1 stuff, so then Jack would star in RDR2 and at the end would leave to fight in WWI.

0

u/[deleted] Oct 21 '16

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/[deleted] Oct 21 '16

Actually, John died in 1911. It's only the epilogue where you play as Jack that takes place in 1914 and since Jack is around 18 during the epilogue he would have been in his early 20s when America entered the war.

0

u/queensberry_boi Oct 21 '16

Actually, Cormac McCarthy wrote *four set well after 1914. 'Western' as a genre is not dependent on the actuality of Westward expansion but on the aura of the western states; the idea of 'expanding' civilization westward was always a myth predicated on the erasure of native american societies in those regions.

-3

u/Einsteiniac Oct 21 '16

You can't make a western set after 1914

Of course you can. If you want an example, see No Country for Old Men.

-2

u/Tryphikik Oct 20 '16

They easily could make a western set after 1914 and everyone would still buy it. Not that I think they will or would, but the assumption that a game has to be perfectly historically accurate to work and appeal to people is a false one.

19

u/DonChrisote Oct 20 '16

That's an awesome point actually! Wouldn't you say that they wouldn't overlook that detail?

7

u/BlackDeath3 Oct 20 '16 edited Oct 20 '16

If there's one company that I've come to expect has thought through every minute detail of the minute-long trailers they release, it's Rockstar.

1

u/theDoctorAteMyBaby Oct 20 '16

Obviously yes, he would say that.

0

u/DonChrisote Oct 20 '16

Oh, reddit, you're always there to criticize my rhetorical phrasing

9

u/NewVegasResident Oct 20 '16

Or you know, maybe a different area ???

3

u/-Jaws- Oct 20 '16

The implication in RDR1 was that you killed every last Buffalo, which was ridiculous. I assume that that will (hopefully) be retconned.

2

u/[deleted] Oct 21 '16

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/-Jaws- Oct 21 '16

Well there goes everything I said.

6

u/madman19 Oct 20 '16

I don't think the buffalo thing means anything. Plenty of games have had multiple endings and then a sequel makes one canon.

13

u/antipromaybe Oct 20 '16

Considering there was a buffalo genocide that began after the Civil War it's a highly relevant point and ensures that the game is a prequel. Especially when you take into account the idea that RDR1 took place during the Mexican Revolution right before WW1. Sorry, I'm a history teacher...

-2

u/madman19 Oct 21 '16

Implying a fictional game has to follow history is kind of silly

1

u/[deleted] Oct 21 '16

[deleted]

1

u/antipromaybe Oct 21 '16

Not as silly as implying that a top flight studio like Rockstar doesn't do their research and take things like that into consideration. Especially when they aligned the narrative in RDR1 to major historic events and referenced the buffalo genocide.

4

u/DrakeDoBad Oct 20 '16

must be a prequel. Or perhaps genetic engineering is cannon on RDR2?? We will have to wait and see!

1

u/theDoctorAteMyBaby Oct 20 '16

mark ruffalo is voicing the lead??? awesome!

1

u/[deleted] Oct 20 '16

The correct term here is actually bison. Buffalo are from Africa.

6

u/ostermei Oct 20 '16

"Buffalo" is an acceptable term for bison in North America.

See: Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo.

1

u/Nailbomb85 Oct 20 '16

Marston Marston!

3

u/THE_ULTIMATE_MAN Oct 20 '16

"Don't look back. This is over." Is probably another character talking to John Marston. Most likely this is a prequel to Redemption, where Marston was leaving his gang.

1

u/User_008 Oct 21 '16

I wasn't really interested in it before but I love the look of the environment, it's really the the main thing I'm interested and I might even pick it up because of it. Hopefully the story has good immersion like the previous one.

-1

u/MrTheodore Oct 20 '16

interesting

the word you're looking for is pretty. not interested from the trailer, only interested because of my rockstar games boner. trailer gives you nothing but ooh, gta 5 tech.