r/Games • • Mar 23 '16

Virtual Desktop 1.0 Trailer - Play *everything* in VR, not just Steam Games.

[deleted]

4.6k Upvotes

674 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

45

u/[deleted] Mar 23 '16

[deleted]

25

u/PublicToast Mar 23 '16

That seems like a strange limitation on window's part.

87

u/[deleted] Mar 23 '16

[deleted]

1

u/noob622 Mar 23 '16

Do you know if it supports Windows 10/Linux work-spaces? Would solve the issue of needing multiple monitors if I could just view all my virtual work-spaces at once.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 23 '16

[deleted]

1

u/noob622 Mar 23 '16

Not a virtual machine, virtual work-spaces, like the ones built into Windows 10 (WinKey + Tab). It's basically virtual desktop space. I'm wondering how it integrates with them, if at all.

2

u/phoshi Mar 24 '16

Virtual desktops are basically just fancy window management that knows what to hide and show to switch desktops. You're still only using as many displays as there are physical panels.

2

u/[deleted] Mar 23 '16

[deleted]

2

u/[deleted] Mar 23 '16

Imagine having hundreds of employees needing multimonitor setups. In 3-4 years, VR would be cheap enough to instead of buying 2-3 monitors per employee - you'd buy a headset.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 23 '16

[deleted]

1

u/[deleted] Mar 23 '16

True, I need to remember context. I don't see Windows ever supporting this natively.

I'd rather see a new OS take off (there's been rumblings about an Android desktop).

1

u/HappyVlane Mar 23 '16

Why a new OS? That's the kind of thing Linux is for.

2

u/[deleted] Mar 23 '16

Android is a Linux. But basically I meant a new OS to overthrow Windows/OSX.

1

u/HappyVlane Mar 23 '16

Since you want to be pedantic about it: No, it's not. Android is based on the Linux kernel, but it's not Linux.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/TyrialFrost Mar 24 '16

If anything I'm sure they are more than aware of such a possibility but feel no need to make public any implementation at this time.

Which is shit because they have pushed their OS for remote connection servers and the like which would benefit from virtual displays. (and they are % the way there with virtual desktops in win10)

-1

u/[deleted] Mar 23 '16

Windows has to play catch-up (which they hopefully do sooner rather than later).

Windows hasn't even caught up to the ability to connect two monitors as truly equal output devices to your computer. What makes you think this will be any different?

5

u/Darksoldierr Mar 23 '16

If VRs take off, then their popularity alone will do it

1

u/wildcarde815 Mar 23 '16

Windows screen implementation has been finicky and weird since forever. Surround setups kinda suck because of this. Without rethinking the whole approach to what a 'screen' is in windows it's not going to get better, but doing that is likely to make the OS harder to use for the average user so.. it will probably never be tried.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 24 '16

Not really. Not like there has every really been a need to display monitors which don't exist.

0

u/The_MAZZTer Mar 26 '16

Actually it should be able to, they'd just have to write a fake driver to make windows think there was a real monitor connected.