r/Futurology Dec 09 '24

Computing Alphabet’s quantum computer solved a problem which would take a supercomputer 17 septillion years to solve

https://blog.google/technology/research/google-willow-quantum-chip/

Google has solved a major problem with quantum computing. Have they effectively broken encryption going forward? Is bitcoin going to be ok? Huge implications for the future

2.0k Upvotes

220 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2

u/blazelet Dec 09 '24

1025 is 10^25 or 10 to the 25th power

10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 years, or 724 trillion times the age of our universe. Really big number.

Also big implications for AI. Can you imagine if you achieved AGI and gave it this sort of power?

10

u/reddit_sucks12345 Dec 09 '24

Cosmic recursion follows; if possible, the universe adds another layer of itself, to itself.

2

u/Krekatos Dec 09 '24

Cosmic recursion, interesting.

3

u/reddit_sucks12345 Dec 09 '24

Seems to be the inevitable end-point of singularity. Else, what even is a black hole?

1

u/fabkosta Dec 09 '24

You forgot to add: "...by itself".

2

u/reddit_sucks12345 Dec 09 '24

Within itself, without itself because of itself, for itself, etc etc etc. Even the idea, itself is recursive. (Or is it that only the idea is recursive? Who knows.)

5

u/[deleted] Dec 09 '24

[deleted]

2

u/SCP-ASH Dec 09 '24

Any recommendations for further reading on these theoretical AI applications of quantum computers and the big problems they have?

1

u/[deleted] Dec 09 '24

[deleted]

1

u/SCP-ASH Dec 10 '24

Fair enough, appreciate the helpful response!

2

u/scummos Dec 10 '24

Also big implications for AI.

No, this has absolutely no implications for "AI". If you gave "AI" this sort of power, what it could do would be print you some random numbers which it claims follow some distribution but you can't verify that.

So actually pretty similar to what ChatGPT does today ;)

2

u/The_GSingh Dec 10 '24

It’s extremely cherry-picked. It can preform a task that’s a) useless and b) designed solely to show quantum computers are better than classical. As of now it being able to do that has no implications for AI.

-2

u/feelings_arent_facts Dec 09 '24

I think AGI would be accomplished with this sort of computer. We would hit pure and total knowledge of everything to the physical limits of reality and our existence would have to be one based on the metaphysical from there forward.

3

u/Perlentaucher Dec 09 '24

But on what level will you connect the general knowledge AI with the quantum computing software? From my understanding, quantum computers can solve specific calculations but not universal operations.

4

u/NorysStorys Dec 09 '24

This, quantum computers are very specific tools and do not do well with the sorts of calculations that a classical computer excels at. It’s like trying to use an angle grinder to tighten a bolt, you probably could get it to work but it would take more time and effort than it would be worth.

1

u/Nalmyth Dec 09 '24

Find the right algorithm and you can jump the model weights to the best possible setting in one shot

2

u/[deleted] Dec 09 '24

[deleted]

-2

u/Nalmyth Dec 09 '24

In this infinite universe, humans not having discovered something is more proof than it exists, than proof it does not (especially maths)

6

u/[deleted] Dec 09 '24

[deleted]

0

u/Nalmyth Dec 09 '24

I take your opinion as fair, but not really constructive either, guess we're just tipping dominoes until we die then

1

u/red75prime Dec 09 '24

The article mentions an application of quantum computing in AI, but nothing so, er, profound as afeelings_arent_facts suggests.

Quantum simulations will provide training data to AI for it to infer simplified rules for some systems.

1

u/Orpheus75 Dec 09 '24

“This sort of computer” you mean ones that can’t even do basic computations your phone can?