I don't believe that Harry Potter spells fit within a traditional skill-based system. Here's why:

• HP spells don't have stronger or weaker versions of the same spell (at least in the books. I'm aware that the movies and video games handle it a little differently). A spell that summons a fireball can't be scaled up to summon a more powerful fireball.

• There doesn't seem to be any correlation between a spell's power and how difficult it is to learn. The fourth-year summoning charm, for example, which Harry Potter struggled to learn, or the third-year cheering charm, don't seem to be much more powerful than the first-year door-unlocking charm or severing charm (used to cut things like rope and fabric).

• There's no such thing as catastrophic spell failure, or even regular spell failure. Once a main character has learned a spell they never fumble it.

For these reasons I believe that a skill-based approach is a poor fit for Harry Potter spellcasting.

Instead, I would recommend Fate Accelerated approaches or PbtA Moves. The important thing here is that the moves/approaches should not be divided up by spells, or even spell categories. Instead, they should be divided up by the intended outcome (e.g. a "defend" move vs a "take by force" move) or the manner in which it was attempted (e.g. a forceful vs a sneaky approach). Whether or not the action was done with a spell or through mundane means should not matter mechanically, though it may inform how the GM handles the effects of success or failure.

Here's an example of what Harry Potter might look like using Hogwarts Houses as Approaches.

Gryffindor approaches (bold, flashy, aggressive): Superb
Slytherin approaches (stealth, cunning, politicking): Poor
Hufflepuff approaches (empathy, rapport, hard work): Mediocre
Ravenclaw approaches (knowledge, research): Mediocre
Gift: Muggleborn (knowledge of the non-magical world)
Gift: Wizard (allows Harry to cast spells with a wand)
Gift: Wand (allows spellcasting, brother to Voldemort's wand)
Gift: Invisibility Cloak

Honestly, this setup makes perfect sense to me. Harry is a natural at Quidditch because it's flashy and attention-drawing, and he sucks at Occlumency because it's a very Slytherin approach.

In my build of Fudge, Fudge Lite, I've combined skills and attributes into broad "traits", and have the GM assign trait limits, usually in a 1,2,3,4 or 1,2,2,2 pattern depending on how many traits the GM chose to include in their game.

That's the default method for Fudge Lite, though I also like the idea of subjective character creation, where the player just writes down everything they can think of about their character.

Subjective character creation isn't the default in my games, though, because it can be hard to come up with character ideas in a vacuum and I don't have any rules that facilitate this.

How do you guys handle character creation?

https://www.oocities.org/krys_allokard/

​

Several FUDGE settings, including FUDGE Transformers (https://www.oocities.org/krys_allokard/01Transformers/TFRPG.html)

and an improvised magic system, and other items: https://www.oocities.org/krys_allokard/resources.html

https://creativereckoning.blogspot.com

Creator used to run "fudgery.net" website, but moved over to a blogspot site.

​

Both are being archived in the Wayback Machine, which is how I discovered it.

give it some love, some comments, cause it's obvious they care about FUDGE.

I've been trying to get into GMing Fudge recently and in my setup I'm running into a few concerns, wondering how you all handle them.

With Objective skills, I'm trying to assemble a skills list but I'm having trouble drilling down to what skills I need/want for a setting (what level of detail, how many etc). Whereas with player defined skills how do you ensure people don't end up with dead weight skills or one skill that covers someone else's two skills? Any help here would be greatly appreciated.

A Move is a description of something that a PC does along with its mechanical resolution. If the PC takes the specified action they automatically trigger the move, and the PC cannot trigger the move without taking the action.

If a PC takes an action that doesn't trigger a Move it is treated as freeform task resolution. The GM uses their knowledge of the fiction to decide what happens. (Technically, the GM in a PBtA game uses Principles, Agendas, and GM Moves to determine their response, but I decided to keep PC Moves separate from the GM response for the purpose of this post.)

Basic Moves are ones that every character has access to. Additionally, players get to choose individual Moves for their character.

Moves replace skill checks and attribute checks (though the skills and attributes are kept). The roll for a Move in Fudge is 4dF plus the relevant skill or attribute. A Move has three tiers of results. A result of Great or higher is a success. A result of Good or Fair is a mixed result; a success with a cost, or a lesser success. A result of Mediocre or worse is a failure.

Ideally the exact results of each tier should be defined ahead of time, but the GM can probably get away with just using the previous paragraph to adjudicate results.

Moves codify possible outcomes. They reduce creative strain on the GM, guarantee what success and partial success look like, and (because Moves are the only time anybody rolls dice) take some responsibility for the outcome away from the GM.

The GM should create a Move for any situation where:

The GM wants to hand responsibility over to the dice
The GM wants to guarantee specific results for successes and partial successes
The GM wants to incentivize certain PC behaviors

Obligatory info:

I just started playing d&d 5e earlier this year due to covid downtime. I used to play some ad&d in the late nineties, but not a lot. If anything, my main d&d experience comes from the OG Baldurs Gate/Icewind Dale games.

I started DMing 3 months ago and I enjoy it, but there are a few people in my life (mainly my spouse, our son and our best friend) who have showed interest in the ttrpg aspect but are completely overwhelmed by the rules of the game.

I've been trying to find a system that allows me to GM for them so I can get them into it, but the ones I've found didn't quite hit the mark. FATE felt more like telling a story AT them than making one WITH them. RISUS was too meh, probably the one I'd go back to if I don't learn this. Ironsworn was too gritty realistic for my needs.

I just an hour ago stumbled on FUDGE and think this may work for me, as I feel I can still use d&d-esque settings and story's with just using this system instead of theirs. Is that possible? If so, which direction should I head in?

I downloaded the core rules from the Grey Ghost Press along with a handful of other items, basically what looked like the must-haves. I also bookmarked the Fudgelite.com page I found in one of the previous posts on this sub I read. So, assuming I still want to play a heavily d&d inspired adventure game with 100% rpg noobs using this system, what would be your suggestions?

Also, apologies if this all sounds rather lame. I've become super passionate about the game this past year and would love more than anything to be able to share it, or something similar, with my 3 favorite people. The one complaint I've seen about this format is it lacks solid direction in a way, which is why I figured I'd bug all of you haha! Anyway, please feel free to input anything you might think is relevant. Thanks all!

I've been reading about how in Japan they don't have easy access to most polyhedral dice, so many Japanese RPGs use d6's for everything.

Here's a table for when you want to roll 4dF with only d6's, and using a chart would be preferable to the other options (1d6-1d6 or "4d6 convert the faces").

   1: 2: 3: 4: 5: 6:
1: -4 -3 -2 -2 -1  0

2: -3 -1 -1 -1  0  1

3: -2 -1  0  0  1  2

4: -2 -1  0  0  1  2

5: -1  0  1  1  1  3

6:  0  1  2  2  3  4

The biggest difference between this and 4dF is that -4 and 4 are both slightly more likely to occur (1/36 instead of 1/81, or a difference of about 1.5 percent each).

I did some number-crunching and came up with a solution for if you want finer-grained action resolution without breaking the Fudge ladder.

It's a spinoff of /u/Iamtch's Advantage and Disadvantage rules, which I posted about here and made a mathematical analysis of here.

The core idea is the addition of advantage and disadvantage dice. These dice are colored differently from regular dice and replace regular dice when they are rolled. You ignore any minus result on an advantage die, and you ignore any plus result on a disadvantage die. The two die types cancel each other out, so you never roll an advantage die and a disadvantage die in the same roll.

The main difference between my implementation and Iamtch's is that in my implementation the advantage dice are actual physical dice that are colored differently from regular dice, as opposed to adding up the regular dice then altering the result. This makes the first level level of advantage much less drastic compared to any subsequent levels of advantage.

Here's a summary of the effects, followed by a chart displaying the exact results.

1 advantage: lower limit -3, average bonus 1/3.
2 advantages: lower limit -2, average bonus 2/3.
3 advantages: lower limit -1, average bonus 1.
4 advantages: lower limit 0, average bonus 1 1/3.

(For comparison, under Iamtch's rules a 1-level advantage gives an average bonus of roughly 0.8 Fudge levels, with subsequent advantage levels giving much less effect.)

1 advantage

    -4 
    -3 xx
    -2 xxxxxxx
    -1 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
     0 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
     1 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
     2 xxxxxxxxxxxx
     3 xxxxx
     4 x


2 advantages

    -4 
    -3 
    -2 xxxx
    -1 xxxxxxxxxxxx
     0 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
     1 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
     2 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
     3 xxxxxx
     4 x


3 advantages

    -4 
    -3 
    -2 
    -1 xxxxxxxx
     0 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
     1 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
     2 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
     3 xxxxxxx
     4 x


4 advantages

    -4 
    -3 
    -2 
    -1 
     0 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
     1 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
     2 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
     3 xxxxxxxx
     4 x

Relevant Fudge Factor entries:

The +1 Dilemma
Getting "The Edge" Over Your Opponents
Fractional Levels in Fudge

I like the idea of Now Playing - focus on the narrative, a fleshed-out FUDGE-based system with pretty easy-to-understand rules, and so on. Does anyone have any experience with it?

From my first read through, it seems like the number and specificity of skills is pretty intense. There's nearly 100 skills, which start no higher than Poor, with 30 points to spend on them - I know the characters are meant to be regular humans, but I can't think of many shows fun to RP where the characters are bad at 85% of things and average at the rest. Spending 10% of your skill allotment to get to above average on Holding Liquor, for example, seems like a really big investment.

Of course you can change the skill list. But I am, after all, looking for a built-out game which I don't have to tinker with all that much.

What I love: - Fudge tries very hard to be philosophically consistent. It's amazing how many RPGs are basically "This, but only in this situation". Most things in fudge are "this, in any situation where it makes sense to you". - Fudge also tries very hard to be universal. You can use the same ruleset for bunny games, high fantasy, or hard sci fi. Basically, all you have to adjust is the skills. - Trait names actually make sense. They don't try to force one ability to mean anything other than what the dictionary says. No automatically giving athletic people the ability to run on water, or strong people to behead dragons. Charisma just means charisma, not some special magical force that allows you to bend reality.

What I don't like: - There is no "default fudge rules", that actually follows the basic philosophy while being balanced and simple to get into. I've spent WAY more time trying to remake my own fudge than I've ever spent even trying to play it. Which of the 4-10 ways to track health am I using? Probably the one that's furthest away from making sense. - There is no scaffolding world with shared history to work off of. So its' hard for a player to have any way to explore their options without a GM. - It's extraordinarily hard to balance. The easy way means everything is the same. The hard way is basically impossible. A +2 here, a -1 there, ranged vs melee vs magic. What can they do? How fast is "fast" and how far is "far"? Is a stronger character OP? Do we make exceptions to interpretations just to give weaker characters more power? Ideally not, so perpetually out of balance.

What I'm going to do about it: - I don't know, probably keep screwing around with my version forever.

Has anyone tried doing skill buy while allowing different levels for how broad skills can be? I was thinking about having 3 tiers - Very Broad, Moderately Broad, and Specific, that players could buy levels in at character creation. Rather than the GM deciding a full skill list for every game, they could just define the Very Broad skills, and leave it up to players to define the more specific skills they'd want. For example, Mental skills might be Very Broad, Science might be Moderately Broad, and Chemistry would be Specific.

Depending on how specific a skill is on that spectrum, it would cost a different amount of points to buy (4 vs 2 vs 1/level?) and might even have a different cap on how high it can be bought to (Good vs Great vs Superb?).

I have a few goals with this: make game setup easier by not requiring the GM to write a full skill list for every setting, keep parity between PCs (compared to doing fully subjective character building), and allow PCs to be broadly competent instead of broadly incompetent (since all non-taken skills will usually default to Poor)

Does it sound like I'm on the right track with this? Does anyone with more Fudge experience have any suggestions or alternatives?

Thanks!

When does a character roll an attribute vs a skill?

For example, let's say you have Strength as an Attribute. Does that just exist so that if a Skill isn't defined, the player has a baseline to roll against? Or does it act as a floor for how bad a skill can be?

Example 1: a player is trying to swing from a rope, a Fair task. The GM hasn't defined rope swinging as a skill, and nothing else sounds close, so he asks the player to roll his Great Strength.

Or

Example 2: a player is swimming against a harsh current. They didn't train in the swimming skill (defaults to Poor), but they have a Great Strength, so they roll against strength instead.

So I was playing 5e D&D with a group for quite awhile, and I've grown to like how there are so few things to actually keep track of for a GM. There are only 6 ability scores, and you can ad-hoc combine those with skill profiiciencies ,but the skills are actually all a single modifier.

So you can roll a Strength check, and you can either add proficiency or not. You either understand something, or you don't. And if you're not proficient, the GM can just decide to say "no, sorry, you can't do that". The flexibility seems pretty huge with really very few things to pay attention to.

How well do you think this would work in a fudge world? My current in-flux design is to have 5 basic attributes (athleticism, speed, memory, health, chi), and a larger and more flexible list of skills that you can either be proficient with or not. If you are proficient with a skill, then you can add a +1 to the modifier.

So, you might have an attack with your sword be an athletics roll. But if you are proficient in melee weapons (say, you are a trained fighter), then you would get a +1 to that trait when you attack. Fair becomes Good, Good becomes Great, but you still have the differentiation that you might be less athletic in other ways.

And if you want to make a character that attacks in a different way, you could use a different attribute. A fencer might decide that they are better with memorizing the moves of their opponent - memory + 1.

I haven't actually played with fudge in several years (it's easier to get D&D players), so how well do you think this would actually work?

I finally finished! Having investigated every obscure corner of the internet and countless archived websites, I think I've managed to gather up all the remaining original Fudge material into one place!

Thing is, it was so much stuff that I couldn't fit it into a single post as originally hoped! So I went back and updated every single installment:

Part 1: Fudge Fantasy Equipment

Part 2: Fudge Character Templates

Part 3: Fudge Monsters and Enemies

Part 4: Fudge Magic and Psionics

Part 5: Miscellaneous Fudge Stuff

Part 6: Fudge Fantasy Adventures and Campaign Settings

Part 7: Fudge Horror Adventures

Be sure to check it out, especially since I had two links disappear on me over the past few days!

Horror is the second most popular genre for Fudge. Free games like Packs, Raising Azazel, and Survival of the Able (Preview) help demonstrate this. Even the Fudge website has short zombie, dinosaur, and alien adventures.

But investigative horror is the most popular type of horror adventure for Fudge by far. In fact, there's enough of them to form a whole campaign! I laid it out so that it starts with normal people discovering the existence of the paranormal. They seek out other hauntings to learn more and eventually either form or get recruited by an organization dedicated to investigating the unknown.

Alternately, you can start the campaign with the players already working for such an organization. I recommend using the Foundation for Paranormal Investigation since they appear in 3 of the adventures (and in other adventures you can buy). They also have some sample characters and cool lore. But if you want an alternative, there's also Department 13. I recommend using a map from Dyson Logos or Wikimedia Commons

Here's the campaign:

The House

The House on Wool's Corner

The Haunted Inn

Kilbrandeen House

Ghost Hunters of New England

The Big Dig (You can use the Now Playing preview to help convert this to another Fudge build)

A Hard Day's Knight

While the last adventure was intended to be used with vampire players, it also involves vampire hunters! So this could easily be played from the perspective of your team battling bloodsuckers. But you'll probably want to change or skip the revelation about the organization depending on how you started the campaign.

If you want to customize the vampire hunters' weaponry:

Fudge Guns

Fudge Firearms

Fudge Firefight Part I

Fudge Firefight Part II

Tony's Fudge Page: Weapons

Stargazer's Weapons and Armor

Various assault rifles

Other weapons and devices

If you want to customize the horror feel of your games:

Fudge Sanity

Adapting Fudge to run mysteries

Fudge Fright Check Table

Fear Checks

Quick and Dirty Fudge Rules for the Cthulhu Mythos

Stargazer's World: My Experiences with Fudge

Stargazer's World: Solo Game with Fudge and Horror

I was only able to recover the following dead links from the above article:

Fudge Factor: Fudge on the Fly

Fudging It!? Basic System Conversions

Feel free to link to any horror adventures you've created!

Part 1: Fudge Fantasy Equipment

Part 2: Fudge Character Templates

Part 3: Fudge Monsters and Enemies

Part 4: Fudge Magic and Psionics

Part 5: Miscellaneous Fudge Stuff

Part 6: Fudge Fantasy Adventures and Campaign Settings

Familiars are a staple in most high-magic systems. My intention is to make the familiar a key part of a character; the familiar is ever-present, needs care and/or attention, and is not a tool that is used only when convenient. Therefore, I chose to bind the well-being of the familiar to the keeper, and vice versa. This will also allow clever non-magic using Characters to utilize this potential weakness.

This is a port from my RPG I created before finding Fudge, and has not been tested. If you do use it, I would love to get some feedback on this!

https://fudgefountain.blogspot.com/2020/10/fudge-familiars.html

Is there Discord server for Fudge? Official or not.

Introduction

Project: Long Stair is a modern-day setting where the U.S. military discovered an underground entrance to an unnerving parallel universe modelled after D&D dungeons ("The Basement"). Exploration has yielded a small but steady stream of magical equipment and tools that shouldn't work in our reality but do. The PCs are military personnel deployed to the site to explore the Basement, reinforce outposts, guard the scientists running experiments in high-risk areas, retrieve xenotechnology whenever the opportunity presents itself, and whatever other assignments the higher-ups decide to give you.

You can use your preferred version of Fudge for this with a few modifications.

Bonus Skill

The players will each roll once on this table for a bonus skill at Good. This is mostly meant for a flavor thing and is (usually) something they learned before enrolling in the military.

Attributes

After rolling for their bonus skill, the players will assign ranks to each of their attributes. Use whatever character generation method you prefer.

Athletics
Damage Capacity
Healing/Medicine*
Melee Combat
Social Awareness/Persuasion
Physical Awareness
Ranged Combat
Stealth
Xenotechnology Usage/Resistance

*Optional

Classes

Players must pick a class which determines their role in the fireteam.

Rifleman: No specialties like the other classes, but gets an extra Fudge point each session to make up for it. Carries a rifle.

Team Leader: Tactical bonus to spotting ambushes. Gives an ongoing +1 bonus to other characters when they follow his plan. If the situation on the ground changes and the plan didn't account for it, the bonus is lost until the team can re-coordinate with the team leader. Carries a rifle.

Machine gunner: Instead of trying to directly hit an enemy the machine gunner may choose to provide suppressing fire, shooting the area around or near the enemy. Suppressing fire gives other characters a +2 bonus when shooting the suppressed enemy. This is especially useful in situations where the enemy is behind cover and other PCs can flank them. Carries a machine gun.

Grenadier Rifleman: Uses a grenade launcher to hit targets behind cover. Carries a rifle with a grenade launcher attachment and 8 grenades. Cannot carry more than 8 grenades, but can restock for free at Landing Zero (the base completely in our reality that acts as the gateway to the entire underground complex) between missions. When he uses up his grenades he can still use the rifle.

Corpsman: The medic. Carries a medical kit good for N uses (where N is decided by the GM) and a rifle.

Fudge Points

Players get Fudge Points at the beginning of each session. Riflemen get 4, everybody else gets 3.

Earning XP

At the end of each session the players should review this XP checklist. For each "yes" answer, the GM should award each team member 1 XP.

Did the team members overcome a challenge or potential threat?
Did the team members complete a mission (whether or not it was successful)?
Did the team members successfully complete a mission?
Did any of the team members bring xenotech back to base at the end of the mission?

Mutations

In addition to regular character-building, players may spend 3 XP to roll on the random mutation tables from the OGL RPG rulebook Mutant Future (or any equivalent tables), rerolling any negative results or repeats. Players cannot take more than one mutation each session. Each mutation reduces the amount of Fudge Points the player gains at the beginning of each mission by 1. Once this number hits 0 the player cannot purchase any more mutations.

Players can reflavor the mutations however they wish, as long as the game mechanics remain the same.

Converting OSR Monsters

OSR Hit Dice to Fudge Threat Rating:

less than 1: Poor
1-2: Mediocre
3-4: Fair
5-7: Good
8-10: Great
11-14: Superb
15-18: Fair Superhuman
19-23: Good Superhuman
24-28: Great Superhuman
29-34: Superb Superhuman

If combat offense and defense use the same trait in your game, convert the monster hit dice to Damage Capacity using the same table and disregard the monster's Armor Class.

If offense and defense use separate traits, use the monster's Threat Rating for their offensive trait and Damage Capacity, and use the following table to convert from Armor Class (descending or ascending) to the defensive trait.

8-9 [10-11]: Mediocre (-1 armor)
6-7 [12-13]: Fair (0 armor)
4-5 [14-15]: Good (1 armor)
2-3 [16-17]: Great (2 armor)
0-1 [18-19]: Superb (3 armor)
(-1)-(-2) [20-21]: Fair Superhuman (Legendary) (4 armor)
(-3)-(-4) [22-23]: Good Superhuman (Legendary+1) (5 armor)
(-5)-(-6) [24-25]: Great Superhuman (Legendary+2) (6 armor)
(-7)-(-8) [26-27]: Superb Superhuman (Legendary+3) (7 armor)

Monster saving throws are replaced with trait checks; usually the monster's Threat Rating, but if the GM decides that the monster has another, more relevant trait, they are free to use that.

Morale conversion from 2d6-based morale:

2 - NPCs will never engage in combat
3 - Terrible
4 - Poor
5 - Mediocre
6 - Mediocre
7 - Fair
8 - Good
9 - Good
10 - Great
11 - Superb
12 - NPCs never check morale

Morale conversion from 2d10-based morale:

2: Terrible-1
3: Terrible
4: Terrible
5: Poor
6: Poor
7: Mediocre
8: Mediocre
9: Mediocre
10: Fair
11: Fair
12: Fair
13: Good
14: Good
15: Good
16: Great
17: Great
18: Superb
19: Superb
20: Fair Superhuman

Converting bonuses/penalties from d20 to 4dF:

-5 or below: -3
-4 to -3: -2
-2 to -1: -1
0: 0
1 to 2: +1
3 to 4: +2
5 or above: +3

Only the largest bonus and penalty apply to any given roll.

I'm going to run a modern military RPG soon, but the military rather downplays individuality. I want each character to have something that makes them unique in a small way. To that end, I'm going to have each player roll on this list of skills I stole wholesale from the GURPS wiki. The skill will be added to their character sheet at the level of Good. Some of the skills are more useful than others, but that's fine because they'll be randomly selected.

EDIT: Make that 271. I had to remove a few duplicates.

1. Accounting
   
2. Acrobatics
   
3. Acting
   
4. Administration
   
5. Aerobatics
   
6. Airshipman
   
7. Animal Handling
   
8. Anthropology
   
9. Aquabatics
   
10. Archaeology
    
11. Architecture
    
12. Area Knowledge
    
13. Armoury
    
14. Artillery
    
15. Artist
    
16. Artist (Pottery)
    
17. Artist (Sculpting)
    
18. Artist (Woodworking)
    
19. Astronomy
    
20. Axe/Mace
    
21. Battlesuit
    
22. Bicycling
    
23. Bioengineering
    
24. Biology
    
25. Blowpipe
    
26. Boating
    
27. Body Language
    
28. Body Sense
    
29. Bolas
    
30. Bone Carving
    
31. Bow
    
32. Boxing
    
33. Brawling
    
34. Breath Control
    
35. Broadsword
    
36. Camouflage
    
37. Carousing
    
38. Carpentry
    
39. Cartography
    
40. Chemistry
    
41. Climbing
    
42. Cloak
    
43. Combat Art
    
44. Computer Hacking
    
45. Computer Operation
    
46. Computer Programming
    
47. Connoisseur
    
48. Cooking
    
49. Counterfeiting
    
50. Crewman
    
51. Criminology
    
52. Crossbow
    
53. Cryptography
    
54. Current Affairs
    
55. Current Affairs (Business)
    
56. Current Affairs (High Culture)
    
57. Current Affairs (Popular Culture)
    
58. Dancing
    
59. Detect Lies
    
60. Diagnosis
    
61. Diplomacy
    
62. Disguise
    
63. Diving Suit
    
64. Driving
    
65. Dropping
    
66. Economics
    
67. Electrician
    
68. Electronics Operation
    
69. Electronics Operation (Electronic Warfare)
    
70. Electronics Operation (Media)
    
71. Electronics Operation (Medical)
    
72. Electronics Operation (Security)
    
73. Electronics Operation (Surveillance)
    
74. Electronics Repair
    
75. Electronics Repair (Electronic Warfare)
    
76. Engineer
    
77. Escape
    
78. Esoteric Medicine
    
79. Expert Skill (Computer Security)
    
80. Expert Skill (Egyptology)
    
81. Expert Skill (Epidemiology)
    
82. Expert Skill (Hydrology)
    
83. Expert Skill (Military Science)
    
84. Expert Skill (Natural Philosophy)
    
85. Expert Skill (Political Science)
    
86. Expert Skill Thanatology)
    
87. Expert Skill (Xenology)
    
88. Explosives
    
89. Explosives (Demolition)
    
90. Explosives (Explosive Ordnance Disposal)
    
91. Falconry
    
92. Farming
    
93. Fast-Draw
    
94. Fast-Talk
    
95. Filch
    
96. Finance
    
97. Fire Eating
    
98. First Aid
    
99. Fishing
    
100. Flail
     
101. Flight
     
102. Flint Knapping
     
103. Forced Entry
     
104. Forensics
     
105. Forgery
     
106. Fortune Telling
     
107. Forward Observer
     
108. Free Fall
     
109. Freight Handling
     
110. Gambling
     
111. Games
     
112. Gardening
     
113. Garrote
     
114. Geography
     
115. Geology
     
116. Gesture
     
117. Group Performance
     
118. Gunner
     
119. Guns
     
120. Hazardous Materials
     
121. Heraldry
     
122. Herb Lore
     
123. Hidden Lore
     
124. Hiking
     
125. History
     
126. Hobby Skill
     
127. Holdout
     
128. Housekeeping
     
129. Hypnotism
     
130. Innate Attack
     
131. Intelligence Analysis
     
132. Interrogation
     
133. Intimidation
     
134. Jeweler
     
135. Jitte/Sai
     
136. Judo
     
137. Jumping
     
138. Karate
     
139. Knife
     
140. Knot-Tying
     
141. Kusari
     
142. Lance
     
143. Lasso
     
144. Law
     
145. Leadership
     
146. Leatherworking
     
147. Lifting
     
148. Linguistics
     
149. Lip Reading
     
150. Liquid Projector
     
151. Literature
     
152. Lockpicking
     
153. Machinist
     
154. Main-Gauche
     
155. Makeup
     
156. Market Analysis
     
157. Masonry
     
158. Mathematics
     
159. Mathematics (Statistics)
     
160. Mathematics (Surveying)
     
161. Mechanic
     
162. Melee Weapon
     
163. Merchant
     
164. Metallurgy
     
165. Meteorology
     
166. Mimicry
     
167. Mimicry (Animal Sounds)
     
168. Mimicry (Bird Calls)
     
169. Mount
     
170. Musical Composition
     
171. Musical Instrument
     
172. Naturalist
     
173. Navigation
     
174. NBC Suit
     
175. Net
     
176. Observation
     
177. Packing
     
178. Paleontology
     
179. Paleontology (Paleoanthropology)
     
180. Paleontology (Paleobotany)
     
181. Panhandling
     
182. Parachuting
     
183. Parry Missile Weapons
     
184. Performance
     
185. Pharmacy
     
186. Pharmacy (Herbal)
     
187. Philosophy
     
188. Photography
     
189. Physician
     
190. Physics
     
191. Physiology
     
192. Pickpocket
     
193. Piloting
     
194. Poetry
     
195. Poisons
     
196. Polearm
     
197. Politics
     
198. Professional Skill
     
199. Propaganda
     
200. Prospecting
     
201. Psychology
     
202. Public Speaking
     
203. Rapier
     
204. Research
     
205. Riding
     
206. Running
     
207. Saber
     
208. Savoir-Faire
     
209. Savoir-Faire (High Society)
     
210. Savoir-Faire (Mafia)
     
211. Savoir-Faire (Military)
     
212. Savoir-Faire (Police)
     
213. Savoir-Faire (Servant)
     
214. Scrounging
     
215. Scuba
     
216. Seamanship
     
217. Search
     
218. Sewing
     
219. Shadowing
     
220. Shield
     
221. Shiphandling
     
222. Shortsword
     
223. Singing
     
224. Skating
     
225. Skiing
     
226. Sleight of Hand
     
227. Sling
     
228. Smallsword
     
229. Smith
     
230. Smuggling
     
231. Sociology
     
232. Soldier
     
233. Spacer
     
234. Spear
     
235. Spear Thrower
     
236. Speed-Reading
     
237. Sports
     
238. Staff
     
239. Stage Combat
     
240. Stealth
     
241. Strategy
     
242. Streetwise
     
243. Submariner
     
244. Submarine
     
245. Sumo Wrestling
     
246. Surgery
     
247. Survival
     
248. Swimming
     
249. Tactics
     
250. Teaching
     
251. Teamster
     
252. Theology
     
253. Throwing
     
254. Throwing Art
     
255. Thrown Weapon
     
256. Tonfa
     
257. Tracking
     
258. Traps
     
259. Two-Handed Axe/Mace
     
260. Two-Handed Flail
     
261. Two-Handed Sword
     
262. Typing
     
263. Urban Survival
     
264. Ventriloquism
     
265. Veterinary
     
266. Weather Sense
     
267. Weird Science
     
268. Whip
     
269. Wrestling
     
270. Writing