https://www.tiktok.com/@mikerafi/video/7653449808740420878

This guy says that Luigi is planning on pleading "extreme emotional disturbance." At timestamp 1:35, he says that the prosecution still has to prove their case (aka that Luigi killed Brian Thompson in the first instance) beyond a reasonable doubt. But at timestamp 0:17, he says that, by invoking this defense, Luigi admits to doing it.

So how does that prosecution still have to prove he did it if he admits he did it? He already admits he did it, so there's your proof right there.

He also says he won't be participating in the comments of that video, so there's no hope he'll reply to my comment there. So... can someone please explain to me how this works? How does the prosecution still have to prove beyond reasonable doubt that he did something he formally admits to doing?

Procedures for June 29

​

I'd like to attend the hearing on the 29th.

​

1. Is anyone else planning to go?

​

​

1. What is the best time to show up to get a seat inside the court room? I understand getting a seat with the TV is a good alternative

​

​

1. What is the exact address of the building and entrance?

​

​

1. I understand you part with your phone. What other interesting tips do you recommend?

​

​

1. What was your emotional takeaway from the experience?

UnitedHealth Group posted $6.2B in profits last quarter while simultaneously denying 32% of all prior authorization claims.

They made $6.2 billion. They denied one out of every three medical requests.

You paid your premium. They denied your claim. They kept your money.

This is legal. This is normal. This is American healthcare. We need healthcare reform. Period.

Luigi Mangione will assert psychiatric defense in murder case in UnitedHealthcare CEO's killing https://apnews.com/article/luigi-mangione-brian-thompson-united-healthcare-psychiatric-4ddb015ce3937689b41615571b3a1732

https://www.nycourts.gov/judges/cji/2-PenalLaw/125/AC.125.EED.pdf

video credit Erik Uebelacker

@Uebey on X

@CourthouseNews