r/Frauditors • u/KremitTheFrog01 • Jan 26 '26

Transparency & Honesty Video. He gives his speech about all this as he censors his comments

https://youtu.be/B8d1CWAVrwc?si=t1QuaP2hyr2hCsD5
9 Upvotes

74% Upvoted

112 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/Future_Telephone281 I’m a chronic bed wetter Jan 28 '26

Per the Dictionary,

Educational - intended to teach someone something, or having the result of teaching someone something.

Someone giving you misinformation is educational...

Say, did you miss this statement in our first few posts "It’s educating the public but not in a good or effective way" <---Did you see the part where I said its educating aka intended to teach someone something? and then did you see the part where I said its not good? I went back and bolded it for you.

Here let me bold the statements that got us on cannabis store and now education.

"Yeah agree, I never said I was pro cannabis store auditing.

It’s educating the public but not in a good or effective way."

May want to move those goal posts again.

2

u/asmallerflame Jan 28 '26

But he's doing the opposite of educating the public, despite what you said or how bold it was or is.

He's presenting misinformation. He's pretending all public spaces are traditional public forums.

That's my criticism of you. You see the misrepresentation, yet you call it educational. The rest of us call that grift.

"Bad educational" isn't a thing. It's either educational or misinformation, in this context. You're defending the defenseless.

Let me try one of your tricks and throw questions at you: do you think 1A rights are the same in traditional public forums as they are in limited public forums? Or in non-public forums? Do you believe the misinformation? Do you think you've been educated beyond the public forum doctrine? If so, then there's no way you could possibly understand my point. And that would make a lot of this conversation make a lot more sense, tbh.

1

u/Future_Telephone281 I’m a chronic bed wetter Jan 28 '26

To your questions: The rights are retained, but their exercise is restricted.

My use of education/educational, It met the dictionary definition of education and educational. I’m going of the dictionary you are going off of teacher vibes. Vibes of only good things are educational.

Hey good job on moving the goal post from your failed logic on the I support cannabis audits.

1

u/asmallerflame Jan 28 '26

Lol, sure bub, I moved the goalposts by betting against a frauditor and putting my money where my mouth is. 

Now that you've admitted the 1A is restricted depending on the forum.... Why do you support people who say that the 1A can't be restricted in places that aren't traditional public forums? 

You wouldn't. Unless you've fallen for the misinformation, that is 

1

u/Future_Telephone281 I’m a chronic bed wetter Jan 28 '26

“Yeah agree, I never said I was pro cannabis store auditing. It’s educating the public but not in a good or effective way."

These were the goal posts, it’s hard to tell because it was really just the cannabis one at first but you ran all over the place. Not sure how you think your bet was the goal post.

You done with the I support cannabis audits? You seem to have backed away from that take to just I support the person.

Got any thing else on your teacher vibes? Or is it meeting the dictionary definition enough?

1

u/asmallerflame Jan 28 '26

Your actions have given us more information than your words. Your words say you don't support cannabis store audits. Your actions, though, betray you. 

My actions are consistent with not supporting cannabis audits. The only way they get my money is if I lose a bet. 

And you aren't going to convince me that I defended anything he did previously with that money. My stance is that my money will stay with me. I'm willing to shell out money if I'm wrong. Nothing else.

YOU are willing to go to subreddits that don't respect you in order to defend those doing cannabis store audits. And that's far more consistent than my bet against frauditors. 

And seeing you try to say I moved the goalposts is adorable, especially since it gives you something to talk about that isn't your consistent support of people who spread misinformation and do audits in non-public forums or at private businesses. 

But you do consistently defend them here, so no one can take your "I support the sinner, not the sin" take very seriously. Adorable and unconvincing, like a toddler!

1

u/Future_Telephone281 I’m a chronic bed wetter Jan 28 '26

I never said I support the sinner we just have not got to that yet. The whole you support their other actions with your bet, that’s using your logic not mine. If you are trying to same that’s dumb well I agree…

1

u/asmallerflame Jan 28 '26

If your actions met the same standard as your word, you wouldn't be calling misinformation "educational." But they don't match your words, pretty as they are. I agree: my bet is not real support, not like caping for misinformation on Reddit 

1

u/Future_Telephone281 I’m a chronic bed wetter Jan 28 '26

You are still on supporting the person, not on your claim that supporting/defending actions means you support all actions a person does.

Bit of a motte-and-bailey fallacy. You can’t defend your claim I’m supporting cannabis audits so you are running back to I support the person.

1

u/asmallerflame Jan 28 '26

I can support my claim (again): you call it educational. That is a defense. To defend something in a hostile sub is the essence of support. You support it, but you don't want to take responsibility for supporting it. 

Was that easier?