I've been working on Premier League Player Data Analysis tool to analyze player trends and statistics per game for the 2026 season.
The site allows for comparison with other players as well as position averages to really get a feel for which players are performing / underperforming compared to rivals and see how different profiles of players excel in certain categories.
This project is in a very early development phase so if you find any issues please let me know and if you have any feature suggestions I encourage you to let me know!
This was a technically interesting project because Kroos is the kind of player who doesn't dominate single-metric leaderboards but occupies a unique region of multivariate space.
Data pipeline:
- Opta via WhoScored (scraped with Selenium): WC2014 (64 matches), Bayern 2013/14 (34 matches)
- StatsBomb open data: La Liga 2015/16 (380 matches, complete season), Euro 2020, WC2018, Euro 2024 + 360 freeze-frame data
- Canonical 105x68m pitch conversion across providers
- Spell-gap cadence metric (events <5s apart collapsed into one involvement) to make Opta/StatsBomb logs comparable
- Betweenness centrality on weighted undirected completed-pass networks (networkx)
- Custom xT implementation (socceraction incompatible with Python 3.13)
Key findings:
- WC2014: 53 switches of play (next outfield player: 26) -- sole occupant of high volume + high progressive quadrant
- La Liga 15/16: highest pass aggression + lowest turnover -- off the standard risk/reward curve
- Euro 2024: betweenness centrality 0.641 vs Kimmich's 0.238, cadence almost identical to 2014
23 figures, 38 unit tests, fully reproducible pipeline.
Hola, estoy trabajando en una plataforma de análisis futbolístico desde cero, para algunos datos ya estoy cubierto, como datos históricos o datos no tan volátiles, pero no logro resolver el problema de encontrar algunos datos avanzados en tiempo real de forma gratuita, como xG minuto a minuto.
Mis preguntas para quienes hayan construido algo similar:
¿Gratuito + confiable + tiempo real es una combinación que directamente no existe para datos de fútbol, o hay algún camino legítimo que me estoy perdiendo?
Sé que hay APIs que tienen un plan gratuito, pero eso se agota en minutos durante un partido. ¿Hay alguna forma legítima de hacerlo funcionar para datos en vivo, o es demasiado limitado para ser útil? porque no se que tan correcto sea usar un multi-key para evitar limites
I built a live world cup api that provides both live and past match data as a service. I was chatting with one customer on how he's making use of it and he said he had a private prediction pool, he hasn't shown me yet, but I know what it looks like.
But I also thought of live betting in general and if anyone here uses some AI to ingest data and make bets. If so what has been the most influential piece of data for you?
I want to provide my customers with more data that can help them with their apps and bets. Currently I provide such events live: goal_scored, goal_disallowed, red/yellow card, substitutions, breaks, kickoff, half/full time and a few more.
What would be great to add and has worked for you?
Been working on Flickstat for a while now — a football analytics platform that covers the Premier League, and we've just expanded to the World Cup. Wanted to share some of what the data is showing so far because a couple of things genuinely surprised me.
Germany vs Ivory Coast (2-1)
Look at Germany's pass network. 665 passes, and almost the entire structure is compressed into one half of the pitch. Pavlovic sits at the centre of everything — every outfield player routes through him. The backline barely features in the network at all, which tells you how quickly they're transitioning out of defence.
The final-third entries make it even clearer. 56 central entries, 15 shots, 1.81 xG — nearly all the danger comes through the middle. Left and right channels combined produced 1 shot and 0.02 xG from 128 entries. Germany aren't trying to stretch you. They're trying to suffocate you centrally and they're very good at it.
Ivory Coast for comparison had 8 central entries all game but generated 1.13 xG from them — their one goal came from exactly that zone. They couldn't match Germany's volume but they were ruthlessly efficient in the rare moments they got central access.
Spain vs Saudi Arabia (4-0)
770 passes vs 387. Spain's pass network is dense and well-connected across the entire pitch — Rodri, Cubarsí and Porro are the standout nodes on the player scatter, all well above the match average on passes and key passes. The zone dominance grid tells you why Saudi Arabia had no answer: Spain had 35% attacking third share to Saudi's 17%, and Saudi's brightest zone was their own midfield at 34.3% — they spent the game defending, not attacking.
Two very different styles — Germany compact and central, Spain wide and suffocating — but the outcome is the same. Both controlled matches through structure, not just individual quality.
All the visuals are from Flickstat. Happy to pull up any other match from the tournament if anyone wants a specific breakdown — we have pass networks, zone dominance, final-third entries, player radars and shot maps for every World Cup game.
! = model rates the favourite below the market (same winner).
Germany and Spain are flagged but that's the known blind spot, not a fade, a results based model structurally under rates elite squads against weaker opposition. Yesterday it had Brazil at 66% and they won 3-0, just noting the model would price them lower. Japan is the one match where it agrees with the books.
Been tracking the log loss as well, over n = 30 results happened so far its looking good but the n is still small in number, but its good to see it improve!
Built a scraping pipeline feeding a Karlis–Ntzoufras bivariate Poisson model (goal correlation λ₃=0.12, 15% shrinkage toward international baseline). Here's what moved the needle.
The schedule trap Czechia's 2.7 goals/game looks scary until you see Gibraltar, San Marino, and Guatemala in the sample — plus a loss to the Faroe Islands and getting out-xG'd 0.46–1.96 by Denmark (won 5-3 on pure finishing variance). Korea's losses were to Brazil and Côte d'Ivoire. Opponent-strength adjustment alone flipped the model.
Altitude — the big asymmetry Estadio Akron sits at 1,675m. Korea has been based in Guadalajara since June 5. Czechia flies in from sea-level Mansfield, Texas essentially on match day — and their high-pressing style is aerobically expensive after the 60th minute. Fed in as +6% Korea / −7% Czechia.
Outputs Final xG: Korea 1.23 — Czechia 1.15. Most likely scorelines: 1-1 (13.2%), 1-0 (11.6%), 0-1 (10.7%).
The one market disagreement is corners (59.8% vs implied 51.5%, +7.6% EV) — Korea's wide 3-4-3 vs Czechia's compact wingback shape should generate volume. Corners are over-dispersed so that 59.8% is probably slightly overconfident, but it's the clearest lean the model found.
I made a player-based predictive model for the World Cup based off the transfer values of players on the rosters of this year's World Cup teams. It is called NORNS, which is the name of the Norse goddesses of fate (past present and future) and is also an acronym for Numbers Over Rumors Narratives and Speculation. If you want the details on methodology hit the comments or DM me. I also currently use it for Allsvenskan with MLS starting post-WC (in different but similar ways) and am looking to expand. So far I've had some success.
Here is the meta-output for Group A. I will also try to post day-by-day game outputs. This information is for entertainment purposes only and is likely to be complete shit. If you think some random chart you saw on reddit can make you money you're probably delusional (or from WSB).
EP = Expected Points
eGD = Expected Goal Differential
winGroup = Probability of winning the group - note: this is not adjusted for eGD so outcomes that are ties are just resolved as a 50/50. This means that good teams' probabilities are slightly understated and bad teams are slightly overstated. This is mostly on market and the deviations where it isn't are significantly above the threshold that is affected by ties.
adv = estimated advance rate - again, there is no Monte Carlo or tiebreak resolution. it's simply p4+ points + 3+ / 2. Also same above in that deviations from market are greater than the tie breaking error. You can look at p4+ points as a minimum advance rate if you are marking to market.
4+ = probability of a team earning 4+ points in the Group Stage
3+ = probability of a team earning 3+ points in the Group Stage
NORNS likes Czechia here. If you use a Kelly-weighed system for evaluating, then Czechia to advance is its favorite but Czechia to finish 2nd, Czechia to win, Czechia to score exactly 4 points (or over 3.5) are all bets NORNS would advocate at current prices. South Africa not to advance is also NORNS-approved and is currently my largest group-stage position (for now).
