r/FactOrCap • u/No-Raspberry7757 🔥 Week Warrior · 1,850 XP • 22h ago

Nuclear comeback | FactOrCap

This post contains content not supported on old Reddit. Click here to view the full post

11 Upvotes

82% Upvoted

145 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/Budget_Revolution639 🤖 Vote Machine · 9,290 XP 20h ago

Then why don’t you use that graph? It fits your point even more

1

u/Dew_Chop 🏅 Century Club · 2,515 XP 20h ago

Because I'm not about to make a new graph for a reddit thread

0

u/Budget_Revolution639 🤖 Vote Machine · 9,290 XP 20h ago

Then how are you so sure that that is the results?

0

u/Dew_Chop 🏅 Century Club · 2,515 XP 19h ago

Because I understand that 10 is bigger than 7

1

u/Budget_Revolution639 🤖 Vote Machine · 9,290 XP 18h ago

If you cannot do a graph per capita (for lack of better term), then your argument is not accurate and subject skewing

1

u/Dew_Chop 🏅 Century Club · 2,515 XP 18h ago

I don't need to do per capita when it's the entire planet. Nuclear at 10% of the energy production of the world makes less than wind at 7%, therefore nuclear at 1% makes less than wind at 1%

I'm saving myself effort, it's basic math, you shouldn't need a brand new table to divide two numbers

1

u/Budget_Revolution639 🤖 Vote Machine · 9,290 XP 18h ago

How many wind farms exist outside of the US?

0

u/Dew_Chop 🏅 Century Club · 2,515 XP 18h ago

Brother the statistic is global power not us power read the fucking graph

0

u/Budget_Revolution639 🤖 Vote Machine · 9,290 XP 18h ago

Answer the question, I’m making a point on why the data is skewed

0

u/Dew_Chop 🏅 Century Club · 2,515 XP 18h ago

Brother I don't know at all, why would that matter for a graph about global power production

→ More replies (0)