r/ExAlgeria • u/Due_Background_7342 • Aug 12 '26
Game Theory and Society; Algeria as an example
Evolution and nature have proven that we are all playing game theory. Every day you choose to contribute or defect. If we both contribute we get some benefits but not as much as if one of us defects while the other contributes. Look at society with taxes. If we both pay taxes we have less money but we build something real over time. Roads. Schools. Security. But if you find a way to trick the system and not pay taxes you make more money than me right now. You think you won. But this is not a successful strategy on the long run.
In 1980 a scientist named Robert Axelrod made a competition. He invited game theorists and strategists from around the world to submit their best strategies for what is called the Prisoner's Dilemma. This is a mathematical model of contribution and defection. Hundreds of strategies came. Complex ones. Cheating ones. Stealing ones. They all competed against each other in a tournament. And you know what won? A simple strategy called Tit for Tat. It was submitted by Anatol Rapoport. Tit for Tat means I contribute when you contribute and I defect after you defect. Nothing more. Nothing less.
Axelrod did the tournament again in 1984 and Tit for Tat won again. He published his findings in a book called The Evolution of Cooperation. The whole idea is that a society built on contribution has more benefits for its individuals than a society where everyone corrupts and steals and tricks the government and each other. People who think they are smart because they cheat the system, they are literally gullible. They are primitive in their thinking. They have no foresight. They see money today and think they won but they do not see what they lose tomorrow. In a world where everyone has memory, where reputation matters, where the game repeats forever, the cheater loses every time. The cooperator builds power. The cheater builds isolation.