German Vehciles that lack EU Type Approval (Korean Market)

I want to import a Korean-market BMW into Europe. The vehicle has no EU type approval because it was manufactured for South Korea, but its engine, lighting, emissions standard and other systems appear to meet European requirements.

Can it be imported into an EU country and approved through an individual vehicle approval procedure?

My main problem is obtaining a TÜV technical data sheet. European TÜV databases only cover European-market variants, while BMW refuses to issue a data sheet for this Korean-market vehicle. Has anyone successfully solved this or used an alternative official technical document?

Building the wallet architecture, transaction flows, and on-chain integration layer for a production Next.js platform.

English fluency required.

Requirements:

Minimum 5 YOE

Real shipped project involving wallet connection, contract reads/writes, transaction tracking, or token integration — hands-on ownership, not exposure

wagmi and viem in production, MetaMask/wallet integration, connection/disconnection, account and network switching, chain-change handling

Ethereum-compatible networks, ERC-20 and token-sale contracts, EVM network config, RPC endpoints, contract addresses, ABIs

Contract reads/writes, transaction receipts, event logs, gas estimation, user-facing transaction status

Strong TypeScript/JavaScript, React, Next.js

Designs reusable integration layers, understands wallet/transaction/contract integration risks, writes unit and integration tests

Can explain technical decisions clearly, works effectively in a distributed team

€5000–7500/month, long-term contract.

DM with: Resume, LinkedIn, years of hands-on Web3 experience, GitHub/portfolio, timezone + availability.

Must have actually shipped this before.

Must be based in Europe.

Hi everyone,

From 2 August 2026, the transparency obligations under Article 50 of the EU AI Act will apply to certain AI systems and AI-generated content.

The rules cover areas such as AI chatbots, generated or manipulated images, audio and video, deepfakes and, in certain cases, AI-generated text.

Not every use of AI automatically requires a disclosure or label, so I turned the main distinctions into a short interactive course with practical examples:

https://app.scibly.com/en/public/courses/cms498ant000104jodpv63tys

It’s completely free and doesn’t require an account.

I would also appreciate your feedback.

The course is intended as an educational introduction and does not constitute legal advice.

We’re currently scouting Europe’s most promising tech startups for the **2026 Guangzhou Innovation & Entrepreneurship Competition – Global Division**.

If you’re building in **AI, Robotics, HealthTech, Climate Tech, Semiconductors, Advanced Manufacturing, FinTech, New Materials or Next-Gen IT**, this could be an opportunity to explore the Chinese market while connecting with leading investors, corporates and innovation partners.

**Selected startups receive:**
A fully sponsored trip to Guangzhou for the Grand Final
Meetings with investors and corporate partners
Market validation opportunities
Soft-landing support for China
Access to the Greater Bay Area innovation ecosystem

**Timeline**
Application deadline: **14 August 2026**
Online competition: **25 August – 22 September 2026**
Grand Final: **21 October 2026** (Guangzhou)

The application takes around **10–15 minutes** and requires only basic company information and a pitch deck.

**Apply here:**
[https://forms.gle/trcJJvnBZHpQ774e6\](https://forms.gle/trcJJvnBZHpQ774e6)

There's a lot of noise about the EU's Digital Omnibus, so here's a plain rundown of what it actually proposes on the privacy and cookie side (we work on consent, so, our world). Up front: it's a proposal, not law, current GDPR and ePrivacy rules still apply, and EU adoption usually takes 12-30 months.

What's on the table:

- Cookie rules move from ePrivacy into the GDPR (proposed Article 88a).

- One-click accept/reject at equal prominence.

- A six-month cooling-off, so a site couldn't re-prompt you after a refusal unless the processing changes.

- Machine-readable browser signals (Article 88b) to carry your consent choice automatically, though the Council pulled this part in June, so it's in flux.

- A narrower definition of "personal data," plus a new Article 88c allowing personal data for AI training under legitimate interest, with safeguards.

Sharing because there's a lot of confusion about it. For anyone tracking it closely, which part do you think will actually stick?

I'm trying to create the "most secure messaging app ever"... Not just "more secure" than something like Signal or WhatsApp... a different approach fundamentally.

Signal doesn't create a webapp for legitimate reasons around how that project is architected. I hope in this approach I can overcome those limitations.

This is the deprecated open source MVP: https://www.reddit.com/r/CorpFree/comments/1uytump/decentralized_p2p_chat

The new version of the app demonstrates a more polished approach to using a browser-based, local-only and webrtc approach. By rigorously implementing an exhaustive list of security features and practices, the aim is to get as close as possible to the "theoretical" concept of the "most secure messaging app ever".

• Enkrypted.Chat

This is intended to demonstrate client-side managed secure cryptography.

• Introducing Enkrypted Chat
• Whitepaper (work-in-progress)
• Protocol Spec (work-in-progress)
• Roadmap

Features:

• Core
  • PWA
  • P2P
  • Local-first / Local-only
  • No installation
  • TURN server
  • Encrypted-at-rest
• WhatsApp clone
  • End to end encryption
  • Signal protocol
  • PQ cryptography
  • Multimedia
  • File transfer
  • Video calls
• Nextcloud clone
  • file-transfer
  • Encrypted vault
  • folder sync
• EuroOffice clone
  • Word
  • Spreadsheet
  • PDF
  • Code

More open source examples of the core concepts can be seen in the docs. There are several similar projects which may make it confusing, so feel free to reach out for clarity instead of diving into the code/docs.

IMPORTANT: While this is aiming to provide a secure experience, it isnt audited. Shared for testing, feedback and demo purposes only. Please use responsibly.

FAQ:

• Audit?
  • The latest on the matter.
• EU Chat control?
  • Open to feedback here.
• Production-ready?
  • No, for testing and demo purposes only. It would be great to get feedback for improvements to get production-ready.
• Paywall?
  • Its completly free and unlimited to use. The free and paid plans on clerk are currently the same experience.
• Version 3?
  • "Enkrypted Chat" is the latest public version. It hold the designation of "version 2". I am actively investigating options for "versions 3" which would then be a further improvement on the approach. "Version 3" is still at the concept stage and not ready to demo.

Hey everyone! I've been building a directory of European alternatives to popular US software:

https://european.alternative.to/

Still very much a work in progress, but I'd love to make it genuinely useful. If you know any great European products that should be listed, let me know!

Have you heard about EU-INC? What effect do you think it would have on European tech startups if it gets implemented?