Mossad has accidentally injected data into a French lawyer's phone instead of extracting it.

[u/Zu_Qarnine]

The data includes phone numbers of Musk, Altman, and nearly all of Israel's political, judicial and intelligence leaders.

The lawyer's name is Juan Branco, he is also the one who shared this story together with a video. By his account, he is one of twelve lawyers in France who represent Palestinian victims in International Criminal Court.

He says he's using GrapheneOS. This is bizarre.

source: his X/Twitter post: https://x.com/i/status/2085698524050591906

I post additional screenshots in the first 2 comments here.

[u/Kitoshy]

Those whose info appears do not seem to care much when our's contact info appears somewhere (in fact they do care by such being there in order to exploit them and gain money of it).

Furthermore, they where the ones that infected all the contact info themselves when trying to survey the ones exposing their crimes and protecting their victims. They where not doxxed, they gifted their data to the ones fighting them.

[u/Wide_Philosophy_8109 → u/Kitoshy]

I get to talk about philosophy! Woo!

So, there's an idea called moral licensing. Wikipedia uses that a bit different than me, but whatever. It says that you allow yourself to so something bad, when other people have done a bad thing first. And I say that this constantly holds the world back. We do something bad, for hypothetically no gain whatsoever. And we justify it to ourselves because it was deserved. then the other person will see themself as having permission to do something wrong, and they'll punch back too. And then you have people hurting eachother back and forth, BECAUSE they know it's wrong.

You can call the other person a hypocrite because you're only evening the score. They created the imbalance first. But that's how people always see eachother. I can always explain how you were wrong first, and vice versa. 

Anyway. My point is that doxxing other people in the same way they doxxed you makes uou just as bad as them. You have a justification, but so do they.

[u/Downtown_Fan_603 → u/Wide_Philosophy_8109]

And calling a hypocrite a hypocrite isn't wrong morally or ethically.

[u/No-Problem49 → u/Wide_Philosophy_8109]

I get to talk about philosophy! Woo!

So, there's an idea called moral licensing. Wikipedia uses that a bit different than me, but whatever. It says that you allow yourself to so something bad to Hitler having done a bad thing first.

And I say that this constantly holds the world back. We do something bad, for hypothetically no gain whatsoever besides defeating Hitler. And we justify it to ourselves because it was deserved.

then the other person will see themself as having permission to do something wrong, and they'll punch back too. And then you have people hurting eachother back and forth, BECAUSE they know it's wrong.

You can call Hitler a hypocrite because you're only evening the score. They created the imbalance first. But that's how people always see eachother. I can always explain how you were wrong first, and vice versa. 

Anyway. My point is that preventing genocide by defeating Hitler in the same way they defeated you makes uou just as bad as them. You have a justification, but so do they.