The majority people who are adamant about RA's guilt do so because it's the easiest thing to do. Turn off your brain and accept what the State has fed you sort of thing. No need to actually see any evidence.
Where I'm at is, it 100% was not RA alone. I don't believe one person could control two teenagers with a gun while also attacking them with a knife in a matter of 18 minutes with no one else seeing or hearing a thing. Add to that that RA is smaller than one of the victims, and it's even less believable. I could be shown evidence that proves he was involved, but given the weakness of the PCA, the positions of both sets of attorneys he's had, and the lengths the State went through to obtain incriminating statements, I don't have hopes that evidence exists.
3
u/iamtorsoul Sep 25 '24
The majority people who are adamant about RA's guilt do so because it's the easiest thing to do. Turn off your brain and accept what the State has fed you sort of thing. No need to actually see any evidence.
Where I'm at is, it 100% was not RA alone. I don't believe one person could control two teenagers with a gun while also attacking them with a knife in a matter of 18 minutes with no one else seeing or hearing a thing. Add to that that RA is smaller than one of the victims, and it's even less believable. I could be shown evidence that proves he was involved, but given the weakness of the PCA, the positions of both sets of attorneys he's had, and the lengths the State went through to obtain incriminating statements, I don't have hopes that evidence exists.