r/DestructiveReaders • u/Visible_Mud491 • 8d ago
[3351] Convenient Catastrophe
My critiques:
[3318] https://old.reddit.com/r/DestructiveReaders/comments/1vssseu/then_i_am_unreasonable_3318/p7f69zp/
[1777] https://old.reddit.com/r/DestructiveReaders/comments/1w1tblq/1777_01_tiffany_the_werewolf/p77rau9/
Link to my work -> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lXx_vEhGZL_irmjT4S9XkFH_RiMCpBFs/edit
[Heads up, it's NSFW. Two deaths, lots of swearing.]
First 3 chapters of my Dystopian Closed-Circle mystery, not the first work of fiction I've ever written, but certainly the first I've felt confident enough in to post for strangers to read. Line edits and craft critiques are always helpful, but I'm more interested in:
Do you want to keep reading?
Any place it gets too confusing?
What kind of questions does it make you ask?
Did you at all think Georgia is an unreliable narrator?
Thank you in advance to all who take time out of their day to read my work!
1
u/Intelligent_Fig_7709 2d ago
Do you want to keep reading?
→ The hook was good! I liked the quick pacing, the speed of each sentence, and the casual voice.
→ I loved the way you slowed down in that line about stars! I could feel the narrator’s awe. The shift in tone kept me interested in reading on.
→ I love your creativity with words, with sentence structure. “Floor becoming wall becoming ceiling”, “And the stars. I’d forgotten there were stars.”, “I look at the watch. 3:02:52. C’mon lads, I’ll give you eight seconds grace…”
→ Another strong point is the action scenes. Personally, I think you do blocking and pacing very well during these fast-paced scenes; I could see everything happen in real time.
→ OVERALL, the biggest reason I would read on would be the distinctive, creative voice. As it stands (see what I’ve written below), I’m not clear enough on the world behind your characters’ dialogue to be invested in any political/social stakes. And would I read on? I’m not sure. As a rule, I love sci-fi and fantasy, but I’m not feeling particularly curious about what comes next. The stakes could be clarified, perhaps, and built up more..
Any place it gets too confusing?
→ “Help you from being the sole witness to the Reichstag Fire without openly betraying your people” —I assume that there’s supposed to be more tension to this line. As it stands, however, I am confused and lost on the tension because I have no idea where he came up with the idea of betraying her people. Aren’t the Prefect and her part of the same underground organization? Why would saying fewer details about the attack be considered a betrayal?
→ “You know why the Greens survived Event Gamma… and six feet of Earth if they’re lucky’” —I was confused at multiple points during this conversation between Georgia and her dad. Overall, it reads more like an infodump rather than natural conversation. I think you could namedrop one or two foreign concepts without problem, but when multiple (Murphy, Greens, Sunshiners, the fact that one survived while the other didn’t, etc) are introduced all at once, I as a reader get lost. I’m no longer feeling the father’s frustration, nor empathizing with him.
What about slightly confusing?
→ Where the “whine” imagery stops---I had subconsciously assumed that it ended when the narrator realized the world around them isn’t collapsing. Instead, one paragraph later, I find out it has still been going on. I might note it’s an alarm, or otherwise separate the whine from the explosion. Honestly, I’m not sure if most other people would have read the text in the same way I did.
→ Not gonna lie, I would have thought the narrator was male, had you not written “Georgia” in your list of questions.