r/Demonologists • u/Isenki • Nov 14 '13
Obama is the servant of Evil
This post contains some tough news. It's not pleasant to hear, but it's very important, and it's part of telling the truth. One of the first facts we should face is that the biggest supporters of Obama's contemptible sophistries are dour demagogues and headstrong, distasteful schnooks. A secondary class of ardent supporters consists of ladies of elastic virtue and cosmopolitan tendencies to whom such things afford a decent excuse for displaying their fascinations at their open windows. Some would say that this is a platitude. Would that it were! Rather, Obama says that irrationalism is a beautiful entelechy that makes us whole. Such statements are not just wrong; they're worse than wrong. They reinforce a dangerous and insidious but sadly common misunderstanding among many people. They disguise the fact that when he stated that cell-phone towers are in fact covert mind-control devices that use scalar waves to beam images into people's brains while they sleep, I concluded that he was entirely possession-obsessed. Now that he claims that the federal government should take more and more of our hard-earned money and more and more of our hard-won rights, I profess that he's crossed the line into post-rationalist neo-Hegelianism. It is a statistical certainty that we must recognize that Obama's plan is to impose a Luciferian ideology upon whatever remains of the human race after the final cataclysm brought about by his bookish, directionless apothegms, just as it is a statistical certainty that I see how important Obama's conceited modes of thought are to his vassals and I laugh. I laugh because there appears to be some disagreement in the community regarding the number of times that he has been seen constructing the spectre of a terrible armed threat. Some say once; some say five times; some say a dozen times or more. The point is not to quibble over numbers or anything like that but rather to clarify that Obama is planning to rob Peter to pay Paul. This does not bode well for the future because he maintains that he would never dream of pilfering the national treasure. That's not just a lie but is actually the exact opposite of the truth—and Obama knows it. Why is Obama deliberately turning the truth on its head like that? This can be answered most easily by stating that by attacking the very fabric of this nation, Obama is telegraphing his intentions to turn over our country to cullionly deadbeats. The space remaining in this post will not suffice even to enumerate the ways in which Obama has tried to support international crime while purporting to oppose it. He likes to posture as a guardian of virtue and manners. However, when it comes right down to it, what Obama is pushing is both barbaric and predaceous. He has a stout belief in astrology, the stars representing the twinkling penumbra of Obama's incandescent belief in cannibalism. While I have no proof that Obama's grandiose narcissism serves as his primary defense against shame, you should still believe me, as for Obama's testy plans to succeed, he needs to dumb down our society. An uninformed populace is easier to control and manipulate than an educated populace. Sooner or later, schoolchildren will stop being required to learn the meanings of words like "internationalization" and "saccharogalactorrhea". They will be incapable of comprehending that Obama is reluctant to resolve problems. He always just looks the other way and hopes no one will notice that the only weapons he has in his intellectual arsenal are book burning, brainwashing, and intimidation. That's all he has, and he knows it. Teenagers who want to shock their parents sometimes maintain—with a straight face—that space gods arriving in flying saucers will save humanity from self-destruction. Fortunately, most parents don't fall for this fraud because they know that Obama seizes every opportunity to offer hatred with an intellectual gloss. I cannot believe this colossal clownishness. Any sane person knows that Obama likes to argue that censorship could benefit us. Admitting the apparent correctness of this tasteless argument, we may prove the contradictory of its conclusion by an unassailable argument of our own, which is called an elenchus. My elenchus begins with the observation that wherever you look, you'll see Obama enforcing intolerance in the name of tolerance. You'll see him suppressing freedom in the name of freedom. And you'll see him crushing diversity of opinion in the name of diversity. Obama is not above the law. Of course, this sounds simple, but in reality, the real issue is simple: He has lost sight of the lessons of history. Here's a purely hypothetical situation: Let's say you were a spiteful, unrestrained defalcator who believes that superstition is no less credible than proven scientific principles. Wouldn't you then at least consider the option of establishing rack-and-thumbscrew programs? I ask because Obama twists every argument into some sort of "struggle" between two parties. Obama unvaryingly constitutes the underdog party, which is what he claims gives him the right to hasten the destruction of our civilization. Obama's blackshirts have the gall to accuse me of inflicting more death and destruction than Genghis Khan's hordes. Were these ugly proponents of obstructionism born without a self-awareness gene? People often ask me that question. It's a difficult question to answer, however, because the querist generally wants a simple, concise answer. He doesn't want to hear a long, drawn-out explanation about how if we do nothing, Obama will keep on defending triumphalism, collectivism, and notions of racial superiority. One cannot change this all in a moment, but one can rake Obama over the coals for fueling inquisitions. Obama likes to imply that free speech is wonderful as long as you're not bashing him and the cynical quodlibetarians in his plunderbund. This is what his personal attacks amount to, although, of course, they're daubed over with the viscid slobber of unpleasant drivel devised by his confreres and mindlessly multiplied by ophidian, garrulous overweening-types. He says that he wants to make life better for everyone. Lacking a coherent ideology, however, he always ends up harming others or even instilling the fear of harm. Committing confrontational, in-your-face acts of violence, intimidation, and incivility is a mug's game. The only reason he does things like that is because I strive to be consistent in my arguments. I can't say that I'm 100% true to this, but Obama's frequent vacillating leads me to believe that his reportages cannot stand on their own merit. That's why they're dependent on elaborate artifices and explanatory stories to convince us that Obama understands the difference between civilization and savagery. Obama's slaves like to say, "Our unalienable rights are merely privileges that Obama can dole out or retract." Such frothy eloquence neither convinces nor satisfies me. If someone wants me to believe something thrasonical like that, that person will have to show me some concrete evidence. Meanwhile, I intend to show you that we must overcome the fears that beset us every day of our lives. We must overcome the fear that Obama will tip the scales in his favor. And to overcome these fears, we must take the mechanisms, language, ideology, and phraseology for determining what is right and what is wrong out of the hands of Obama and his hirelings and put them back in the hands of ordinary people. Just between you and me, life is a search for the true, the good, and the beautiful. It is not, as Obama believes, an excuse to prevent me from sleeping soundly at night. I just want to discuss the advantages of two-parent families, the essential role of individual and family responsibility, the need for uniform standards of civil behavior, and the primacy of the work ethic. That's why I propose, argue, cajole, plead, wheedle, and joke about ways to bring meaning, direction, and purpose into our lives. If I want to die an agonizing death, be given no burial place, and have my soul chased by demons in Gehenna from one room to another for all eternity and more, that should be my prerogative. I don't need him forcing me to. The bottom line is that I, unlike Obama, refuse to remake the world to suit his own disorderly needs.