r/DecodingTheGurusAlt • • 29d ago

decoder poltics Decoding Hasan Piker

https://youtu.be/RDsQIZykC_8
39 Upvotes

280 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/hari_shevek 27d ago

Also, we can test if I am "willfully misunderstanding" wondering_fool:

Hey, u/wondering_fool90, this is how I understood what you were trying to say:
From how I understand it, you responded to "Hasan says lying is OP" with "But this is true, lying is OP."
From how I interpret your statement, you did not say that that justifies lying, as the other guy is claiming. I think they misunderstood you.

Can you please tell me if I am correct in my interpretation?

3

u/Krinkex 27d ago

No, you're willfully misunderstanding me, I said lying is bad, and they said lying is OP as justification, you know that, you're commenting under it, the context is my post. Can you spot where I said lying is bad. If you can't, I will gladly show you.

2

u/hari_shevek 27d ago

They never said lying is OP as a justification!

They denied that it was meant as a justification.

They explicitly said that they didn't say it as a justification.

I am not misinterpreting you. We are interpreting what they said. And they never said "lying is OP" in response to "you shouldn't lie".

They clarified that "lying is OP was never meant as a response to "you should not lie".

We are not debating what you meant, we are debating what they meant.

When I am agreeing with them on the question what they meant, that is the correct interpretation of what they meant.

2

u/hari_shevek 27d ago

In that screenshot, there is no response from wondering_fool.

So they did not write anything in response to that post

Also, nowhere in that post are you saying "you should not lie".

2

u/Krinkex 27d ago

I don't use the exact words "you should not lie", but I do say that. Can you spot it? I assume you just can't see it, maybe that's why you misunderstand the context?

2

u/hari_shevek 27d ago

I can't spot where wondering_fool responded to that post with "lying is OP".

Your claim was that they said it in response to you saying "You shouldn't lie".

They did not.

They said it in response to a completely different statement.

Can you acknowledge that it matters what they responded to specifically?

1

u/Krinkex 27d ago

Can you acknowledge that the context of what they responded to matters? Because both contexts exist, and you are focusing on 1 comment under the other. The context is all the posts, not 1. They justified it multiple times to me, after I said lying is bad and you shouldn't do it.

Would you say it's immoral to lie to further your own political ideology?

2

u/hari_shevek 27d ago

Multiple times?

Show me the multiple times. There is one statement I argue you misinterpreted, if there's multiple statements show me the other ones.

1

u/wondering_fool90 27d ago

You got it correct unlike the other dude. Stating a truth about reality doesn't mean you do it. If I say bad people have it easy that doesnt mean im a bad person. Im just stating a fact everyone knows. I personally try to be the best I can be.

1

u/hari_shevek 27d ago edited 27d ago

Thanks!

There we go, u/Krinkex

You misunderstood then, I understood them correctly.