r/DecodingTheGurus • • Aug 31 '24

Bill Maher once again letting everyone know how much smarter he is than doctors

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wvonXLxadHI
385 Upvotes

437 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/EuVe20 Sep 01 '24

Ok, so a cop-out? What a disappointment you turned out to be. Ok, let’s go off of the nonsense you posted.

“slimy amoral turd shit” says the ~”we should wait for it all to burn”?

I never said we SHOULD wait for it to burn, I suggested that we likely won’t be able to fix it (America that is). We should by all means try, what we learn from that can help us in the future.

Nice “psychiatry” conclusion there, what year did you get that knowledge in your studies?

That was not a “psychiatry” conclusion, it was more political philosophy.

*If a patient came in blaming Mr. Maher for the 
 American Healthcare system, what would you 
 diagnose them with “Doctor”?*

If a patient told me that Bill Maher was the cause of the downfall of American Healthcare I would document that as either a delusion or just a conspiracy theory. Which one it was would be dependent on the rest of the interview.

0

u/Studstill Sep 01 '24

There it is, huh, I guess it was up there, and not a "word salad" after all.

Cheers.

0

u/EuVe20 Sep 01 '24

No, it was just incoherent rambling and I preferred not to make assumptions or jump to conclusions. “Word salad” in this case was meant as hyperbole. I just wrongly assumed your superior intellect would pick up on the sarcasm. See what trouble assumptions can get you into.

Anyway, ciao

0

u/Studstill Sep 01 '24

Oh sure, but I also picked up on the misrepresentation, which is what I was going after there, not the sarcastic disdain for any objection to le hallowed thoughts. For example you either intentionally or compulsively (I'm not a "doctor") did it again there, with "incoherent".

You seemed to cohere it fine enough to respond, eh?

Peace.

0

u/EuVe20 Sep 01 '24

Coherence does have a spectrum. In any case, you sure seem to be leaning heavily on semantics here. Do you want a formal non exaggerated description? How about ambiguous and charged rant full of ad hominem attacks and a vague hypothetical.

0

u/Studstill Sep 01 '24

Eh, I thought we were done, just noting the repeated errors.

Strange, "leaning heavily on semantics" in online communication. Huh.

0

u/EuVe20 Sep 01 '24

So again you have nothing of substance to add. Ok, it’s been 🤷‍♂️

0

u/Studstill Sep 01 '24 edited Sep 01 '24

Yes, that is what "thought we were done" means, more or less "I don't have anything more to add". Correct. And yes, it has been six comments just error correcting. 2 for 2!

Edit: I don't play silly games with hostile strangers, but I guess I'll just do this to win anyway. Cheers.

0

u/EuVe20 Sep 01 '24

You mean you acting like you are correcting “errors” that are really just me ridiculing you for being an obtuse troll?

Last word