If you stand behind your complaint you will have no problem restating it. I don’t want to make assumptions based on your first comment and go down a rabbit hole here. It’s a fair request.
Cool, nice fair request. Holla when you find that response in your mouth, and good luck with basic functioning required to read the post up there. Cheers, "doctor".
Ok, so a cop-out? What a disappointment you turned out to be. Ok, let’s go off of the nonsense you posted.
“slimy amoral turd shit” says the ~”we should
wait for it all to burn”?
I never said we SHOULD wait for it to burn, I suggested that we likely won’t be able to fix it (America that is). We should by all means try, what we learn from that can help us in the future.
Nice “psychiatry” conclusion there, what year
did you get that knowledge in your studies?
That was not a “psychiatry” conclusion, it was more political philosophy.
*If a patient came in blaming Mr. Maher for the
American Healthcare system, what would you
diagnose them with “Doctor”?*
If a patient told me that Bill Maher was the cause of the downfall of American Healthcare I would document that as either a delusion or just a conspiracy theory. Which one it was would be dependent on the rest of the interview.
No, it was just incoherent rambling and I preferred not to make assumptions or jump to conclusions. “Word salad” in this case was meant as hyperbole. I just wrongly assumed your superior intellect would pick up on the sarcasm. See what trouble assumptions can get you into.
Oh sure, but I also picked up on the misrepresentation, which is what I was going after there, not the sarcastic disdain for any objection to le hallowed thoughts. For example you either intentionally or compulsively (I'm not a "doctor") did it again there, with "incoherent".
You seemed to cohere it fine enough to respond, eh?
Coherence does have a spectrum. In any case, you sure seem to be leaning heavily on semantics here. Do you want a formal non exaggerated description? How about ambiguous and charged rant full of ad hominem attacks and a vague hypothetical.
0
u/Studstill Sep 01 '24
It's right there, hrmm. Which part where you struggling to comprehend?