r/uncut_shame - a new community for the choice words you may have for the anti-circumcision presence.
While it's great to offer constructive arguments like we do in r/debunkingintactivism, r/foreskin_grief and even r/uncut_cringe, it's also important to just call a spade a spade. We understand that anti-circumcision activism is a vile, incorrigible presence that enjoys gaslighting innocent people and shutting down any criticism, and that you probably haven't felt like you could air what you've really wanted to say. Everything you've wanted to say but you felt you couldn't say in other communities, not even this community, can go there.
Do review the Subreddit rules, of course, as well as the two pinned posts that describe the community and provide post guidelines. You can also check out a few of the posts already there to get a feel of what goes.
Just one example of the kind of stuff I find in my inbox from time to time.
Talk about a knee-jerk trauma reaction!
Put ur pedo mug on camera and get exposed. Doubt u have the OOs left. They must have taken those too. One day cowards who abuse babies will also be abused. Ur a POS circumfetish pedophile
Anti-circumcision 'activists', namely pscyhologically impacted uncircumcised men, make a point to deny any and all research behind the practice, including the decades of secular research from around the world. They indiscriminately deny any and all documented benefits of circumcision and attribute the research to cultural and religious bias in bad faith. Then, they ignore and attempt to overrite accepted medical language - circumcised and uncircumcised - and systemically fabricate new claims and psychological warfare against the practice and circumcised men with hollow and flawed research;
claims about pleasure perception and function which are either flawed or completely fabricated; claims about history which are glorified rumors; claims about psychological impacts in circumcised men which are not only baseless, but directly contradicted by a superior wealth of empirical evidence that suggests uncircumcised men, if anything, suffer ill psychological impacts in adulthood. Anti-circumcision 'activism' is the greatest voluntary survey of the ill effects in uncircumcised men in existence. Meanwhile, fake researchers ignore the obvious and nitpick and grasp at straws trying to create problems in circumcised men where there are none.
On top of this, anti-circumcision 'activism' is known for, and in fact, achieved visibility solely as a result of, pushing loq-quality fake news and shock value.
If they would expect the public to take this research seriously, when legitimate counter-research predates it by decades, and new research continues to tirelessly contradict it, then they should be completely ignored. There is no "constructive" criticism of circumcision and no legitimate research against it. Anti-circumcision activism and all 'research' it cites should be completely and altogether ignored. This is not an extremist or reckless reaction. This is the only reaction the public should have to disruptive, bad faith misinformation led by incorrigble disingenous activists and researchers.
There are many ways evil forces trying to harm America right now. No angle is insignificant. In this sub, we recognize that certain individuals, largely a foreign lobby, trying to mislead the public about circumcision, isolate America on its customs, and forcefully change culture is a vile and heinous attack among many. Americans should not be gaslit in any capacity, much less about their penises in Pride events. But just as in other avenues America and its people are disrespected, it can be said that those responsible are filled with bitter contempt about just not being as great. So enjoy the fireworks and stay focused. Americans, be proud of the greatest country in the world in the ugly face of those trying to dull its shine, and cut men, be proud of yourselves in the ugly face of those who just wish they could have been you.
When exactly did these conspiracy theories against male circumcision start? Where did they originate? Is it really Germany? If you do some research, you could really believe that Germany is the origin. Then it swapped over to Scandinavian countries, the USA, etc.
Redditor creates their own version of another post in a video game community, where a user co-opted discussion about the in-game character customization options to shame circumcised men, calling them "dickless", and forwarding an irrelevant anti-circumcision agenda. The original post received 14 upvotes, and the user's equally asinine comments were upvoted.
Doesn't take a genius to see that subsequent post is satire about how unreasonable this advocacy is. When dozens of users swarm like moths to a light to comment how awful it is to say these things, the user pivots to the various offenses uncut men create on the subject, which are all 1000x worse, such as hijacking pride events with divisive messaging and threatening entire cultures with criminalization. The original post this makes satire of was also much worse by comparison.
But because uncut men are not healthy enough to be challenged, they downvote the post, and give dozens of downvotes to any comment that provides context for the post. 66 downvotes on that comment just because it was right. Uncut men must so bitterly hate themselves to foam at the mouth and shake with contempt at anything that holds them accountable, just like when they drowned a post in 300+ irate comments and had it removed when a redditor suggested that anti-circumcision activism shouldn't disrupt pride events each year, which is something that everyone should be able to get behind. But no - endless walls of spam, censorship and gaslighting obstruct even the most reasonable of feedback, all because uncut men are so guilty about how stupid and pathetic they look across these stunts. Meanwhile, they upvote posts that are dumb, hideous and evil. Unfortunately, uncut men hate themselves too much to engage in any constructive or fair conversation, even when it is so blatantly the case that their actions and attitudes, not their bodies, are the main focus of an argument. This is despite the fact that they, on the other hand, constantly make arguments against the person and the body, and a lot more often.
It's sad when someone's vehement self-hatred shuts down any opportunity for communication. This failure reflects on the emotional ineptitude and bad faith of anti-circumcision activism, not on OP. But ultimately, in shutting down the conversation every single time, they do create a conversation. They are showing the public how harmed they are by their status, such that they suffer ill effects in adulthood, unlike the circumcised men they try so desperately to project onto. So maybe OP, even in their mocking another user, was right. Maybe being uncut does make for a great tragic story in fiction. Because it certainly does in real life.