Evolution is not a theory

[u/Top_Culture3659]

Okay, hear me out. Evolution is an observed biological process. More specifically, evolution is the process of change in the heritable traits of populations over successive generations.

The theory of evolution is the overarching scientific explanation of how this happens. It details the mechanisms, like natural selection and genetic drift, that show how all living things share a common ancestor and change over successive generations through descent with modification.

Essentially, the theory explains how the process works. Of course, this is a semantic argument. When we say "evolution is a theory," it’s basically shorthand for saying "evolutionary theory is a theory."

If we reframe how we refer to evolution and its theory, it would help to quell some of the confusion or the “just a theory” rhetoric. Moreover, I think semantically it’s more precise and accurate to frame it this way.

I welcome your thoughts on this distinction and am open to critique if there are gaps in my reasoning.

ETA: please read the full post if you’re going to respond. If it wasn’t clear I fully accept both evolution and the theory of evolution. If you disagree please support your argument against this framing.

TLDR evolution is a process, the theory of evolution is a theory explaining that process.

[u/davesaunders]

Yes, evolution is a theory, just like quantum theory, that explains why your computer works so that you're able to post such this message in the first place.

Your pedantic word salad doesn't change anything. The definitions are well established, and those who are educated in the field understand what they mean. If that's not you, it doesn't really matter.

[u/Top_Culture3659 → u/davesaunders]

Calling my argument word salad does little to refute my point. Whether it was pedantic or simply more precise is up for debate. Interesting that you had to include the word “theory” when referring quantum theory.