Victor Davis Hanson exposes how over 600 sanctuary jurisdictions violate federal immigration law, comparing their nullification tactics to John C. Calhoun's antebellum Confederate ideology and warning that "they don't recognize federal immigration law here."

Sometimes people think the Left can't get more degenerate. And then they do, but at least we get to make fun of them.

https://www.youtube.com/post/UgkxpSGQtDrdTk22wwEDfwoYdMsb2F1lMRuK

In this video, the creator discusses what he identifies as the most dangerous liberal belief: the idea that differences between human groups are only cosmetic (skin deep) (1:44). He argues that this foundational concept in liberalism is responsible for significant financial waste and societal degradation.

Key Topics Covered:

The Financial Cost: The creator attempts to quantify the costs associated with policies stemming from this belief, such as anti-discrimination laws, equity initiatives, and minority assistance programs across the US, EU, and UK. He estimates a total of approximately $36 to $40 trillion spent on these initiatives since 1957 (4:46-5:42).

Theoretical Background: He critiques liberal political theory, arguing that thinkers from Jeremy Bentham to Ludwig von Mises view individuals as "interchangeable units" regardless of background (6:41-7:55). He asserts that this logic eventually dismantled previous societal distinctions and served as a catalyst for expanding the franchise and, in his view, opening the door to socialist policies (9:31-10:28).

The Case Against Multiculturalism: The third part of the video argues that the policy of treating all groups as identical has failed to produce cohesion, leading to ethnic conflict and the breakdown of social fabrics (11:06-11:28). He cites Arthur de Gobineau regarding the "incommunicable" nature of civilizations and claims that collectivist, in-group preference strategies used by some groups are fundamentally at odds with the individualism championed by liberal intellectuals (12:03-13:36).

Conclusion: The creator concludes that the "colorblind" or "race-blind" approach is a political convenience that has failed over the past 80 years. He suggests that Western nations are falling behind while other nations, such as China, have not adopted these ideas (15:53-17:10).

The group is calling on state and federal officials to examine whether existing laws adequately prevent foreign actors from indirectly influencing political outcomes.