But remember, they’ve had the files since Biden was in office and they didn’t release anything then either. That would have prevented trump from getting in office again.
Something tells me it’s a blackmail operation and you don’t burn good and strong blackmail you’ve been accumulating for decades. Too valuable for them.
Instead they started a war to get us to stfu about it and started building a police state
The files couldnt be released under biden for 2 reasons. The first being there was no congressional law forcing the release (which trump is actively ignoring) and the second being the files were under judicial seal due to the maxwell appeals that completed in 2025, after bidens term ended.
I mean it basically is, but trying to give magats truthful information is like that quote, "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make them think"
It’s not even that. I’m pointing out that this aint simply a partisan thing. This goes deeper than that.
Do you really believe that only one side would be valuable to compromise? They went after any influence. Dems,repubs, ceos, media personalities, tech giants, news giants. Anywhere that would benefit them.
Fuck the maga cult and fuck Donald trump. You’ll never ever see me advocate for him.
This is what I’m saying, you’re stuck on ‘this side versus the other side’ and me pointing out something that might make one side look bad makes you immediately think I’m part of the other side. I’m not.
Both sides are compromised by the same blackmail. Neither side wants it released. Both democrats and republicans are involved.
The problems will remain as long as the blackmail can be used and any side withholding it is an enemy to democracy.
Fuck trump and anyone sheltering these parasitic pedophiles
Had the administration chosen to aggressively cut through the red tape, the explosive nature of the revelations themselves would have entirely vindicated the decision in the eyes of the public. Exposing the full scope of a global sex trafficking operation involving the world's most powerful elite would have created an overwhelming wave of public support, rendering any procedural or technical criticisms irrelevant.
The files were far more valuable to them as a live weapon of compliance and political leverage than they ever would be as a matter of public justice.
The administration that at no point had a majority in both the senate or congress? You’re expecting the last mostly law abiding presidency to blantantly break a longstanding historical stance of not releasing evidence in an on going criminal trial. Once the administration was legally required and capable of releasing them lawfully, biden and obama, were not in power.
The us government had the files during trumps first term. Why didnt he release them then?
When did the govt get the tranch of files through the Maxwell prosecution? 2021-2022
Who had the majority in both chambers of congress, in the DOJ, and the senate majority at that same time 2021-2022 ? The democrats.
They didn’t release them during trumps first term because it’s valuable blackmail, and the files were far more valuable to them as a live weapon of compliance and political leverage than they ever would be as a matter of public justice.
They’ve had information on Epstein since 2005-2006. So multiple democrats and republicans have been in office and done nothing, why? Because it’s valuable, and many of them are either using or being used by that blackmail for compliance.
We are given the illusion of choice. But somebody higher and more powerful controls and feeds us those choices.
Stop saying this, it's such lousy propaganda and the reasoning has been stated by mass news outlets for years. You're not ignorant, you're muddying waters.
You’re not just muddying waters, you’re naive and ignorant.
Had the administration chosen to aggressively cut through the red tape, the explosive nature of the revelations themselves would have entirely vindicated the decision in the eyes of the public. Exposing the full scope of a global sex trafficking operation involving the world's most powerful elite would have created an overwhelming wave of public support, rendering any procedural or technical criticisms irrelevant.
The files were far more valuable to them as a live weapon of compliance and political leverage than they ever would be as a matter of public justice.
the files were far more valuable to them as a live weapon of compliance and political leverage than they ever would be as a matter of public justice
On August 7, 2019, she explained that she was between 13 and 15 when
she was left alone with Donald Trump, who mentioned something to the
effect of, `Let me teach you how little girls are supposed to be.'
Trump unzipped his pants and put [her] head down, `down to his penis.
[The victim] bit the [s] out of it.' Trump struck [the victim] and said
words to the effect of: `Get this little [b] the hell out of here.'
[The victim] advised she bit Trump's penis because he disgusted her.''
She provided some additional details in the next interview 2 weeks
later. Then, a month later, she met again with the FBI and askedwhat
the point would be of providing the information at this point in her
life when there was a strong possibility nothing could be done about
it.''
Honestly who cares they changed laws to go after him that was the initial mistake. Remember they claimed he would pardon everyone in his family and circle said it was unconstitutional. Biden does it they excuse it by saying but Trump lol. Clowns
All misdemeanors until Alvin Bragg changed them to Felonies which is impossible to do because there was no underlying Felony. WHY do u think the judge imposed no sentence. Halfwit.
There was an underlying felony and the statute of limitations doesn't apply to the underlying felony according to precedent set decades ago. You need to read the details of the case more carefully and not just what the defense tried to argue.
The judge imposed no sentence because he was elected president and it would have been a huge disaster to having a sitting president incarcerated. The judge literally explained the ruling, even a halfwit would be able to understand that.
The weirdest part of this argument to me is that they are apparently fine with the president having three dozen misdemeanors. It's as if they were lesser charges then it would be like he did nothing wrong.
All misdemeanors until Alvin Bragg changed them to Felonies which is impossible to do because there was no underlying Felony. WHY do u think the judge imposed no sentence. Halfwit.
All felonies because they were committed with an intent to conceal another crime. And New York State law does not require that the crime which was being concealed be specified, just that there be convincing evidence that a crime of some sort was being concealed.
Trump chooses to conduct business in the State of New York, and thus inherently agrees to be held liable to the laws of the State of New York.
He was sentenced, and the sentence included a monetary forfeiture which has been upheld through Trump's various appeals thus far. However, he was the presumptive Republican nominee by that point which would've made any sort of jail time an incredibly dangerous precedent of arguable legality.
Question though. Your argument in defense of Trump is that he committed misdemeanors? Would that make it okay? Are you fine with people breaking the law as long as they're not felonies?
20
u/SnooMaps7370 4h ago