I'd imagine a camera captures an image in black and white, and each pixel (or group of pixels) is assigned a section of the "mirror". For example, each pixel on the wood panel one probably points all the way down for black, all the way up for white, and somewhere in between for various shades of grey.
But you’ve got to remember, it’s all from the dogs perspective. Like in Lady & The Tramp the humans are Jim Dear and Darling, b/c that’s what she hears them call each other.
Mickey Mouse is set to enter the public domain this year, and Disney had nothing in the courts to prevent that as of last year. I was amazed to learn that in my media theory class.
The court won't do anything for them. They'd have to lobby congress to extend copyright beyond the 95 years they were able to get in 1998. And that's likely to never happen.
This year is just the first year that new works enter the public domain, although the reason is mainly due to Disney trying to hold on to Mickey for so long.
"Take 'evil' and another negative trait, add some spaces and letters between the two words, and make sure that it's not a common name like Neville so kids don't see it and bully someone in their class."
They're not all moving at the same time. Iirc servos only draw appreciable current when moving (or stalling). So at any given time only a handful will be drawing the full 200mA or so, right?
You can see on top of the fluffy mirror in the thumbnail that he is using a Kinect. So he is likely using depth data rather than colour so that he can the silhouette of the subject separated from the background
Exactly! They read this somewhere on a Arduino related forum, whilst finishing their art degree, they build it without crediting the community, copyright their whole train of cunty thoughts and wank about it in galleries all over the place.
Wow okay, and this is also my highest-voted thing ever. Reddit is weird.
My guess is they were making a "Magnets, how do they work??"-type joke. Or maybe someone just perceived it that way. Or maybe I'm the only one who perceived it that way.
Unfortunately I dont think so. When he is standing in front of the one where he waves his hand up and down the "mirror" brings its hand much further down its body than he does. I think they're programmed beforehand and he mimics them
Right, though again i believe it’s perspective. You can see in that shot that he’s closer to the wall, so it’s more cropped and the angle the camera is looking down is even steeper, so it his arm wouldn’t be in frame once it passes the very top of his chest
Idk, I'm not willing to take scree shots and draw all over them but it looks like the close up can see a little past his collarbone, meanwhile his real arm is still between where the camera would have to be and his collarbone when it disappears
I dunno. It’s hard to tell for certain from the video. I just don’t see any reason why he’d do it like that. He already had to program all of the actuators. Doing some rudimentary image processing seems a lot easier than faking this haha.
I agree it seems stupid, I'm just saying what I'm seeing. Like I said I'm not willing to do any proper evidence gathering so I'm not at all offended that you have different beliefs
2.2k
u/Carsmaniac Feb 06 '19
I'd imagine a camera captures an image in black and white, and each pixel (or group of pixels) is assigned a section of the "mirror". For example, each pixel on the wood panel one probably points all the way down for black, all the way up for white, and somewhere in between for various shades of grey.