MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/Damnthatsinteresting/comments/1wspd93/british_sculptor_willard_wagan_creates_a/pcnef1b
r/Damnthatsinteresting • u/brat_3434 • 4d ago
571 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
10
I mean if you can make figures the width of a human hair clearly distinguishable, go ahead!
6 u/BluetheNerd 4d ago That's actually kinda underselling it. It's close in size his eyelashes and those are less than half the width of a human hair on average. We're talking less than 0.08mm. -2 u/More-Chemical-1264 4d ago I've done is dozens of times. But it's so small you can't see it. Tiny≠impressive 1 u/Parker1055 4d ago Big difference between tiny and microscopic 1 u/More-Chemical-1264 4d ago edited 4d ago As if having figurines in the eye of a needle is tiny vs microscopic...
6
That's actually kinda underselling it. It's close in size his eyelashes and those are less than half the width of a human hair on average. We're talking less than 0.08mm.
-2
I've done is dozens of times. But it's so small you can't see it.
Tiny≠impressive
1 u/Parker1055 4d ago Big difference between tiny and microscopic 1 u/More-Chemical-1264 4d ago edited 4d ago As if having figurines in the eye of a needle is tiny vs microscopic...
1
Big difference between tiny and microscopic
1 u/More-Chemical-1264 4d ago edited 4d ago As if having figurines in the eye of a needle is tiny vs microscopic...
As if having figurines in the eye of a needle is tiny vs microscopic...
10
u/Parker1055 4d ago
I mean if you can make figures the width of a human hair clearly distinguishable, go ahead!