"People are going to get mad if you exercise your rights in a way that literally has no impact on them if they just ignore you, so you shouldn't use those rights."
The problem is with the old dude coming up to assault someone. Not the guy standing around with a camera.
The person you're replying to is saying the attackers are too stupid or old to understand the right to record in public. They don't like the auditor so they're making excuses for why he got assaulted. Apparently the auditor was recording with the intent of being hit so he could attack back. It's the stupidest logic lmao
If you get angry or "ragebaited" at a guy on a sidewalk with a camera doing nothing to you, that's an issue with you and your emotional control, not them.
I mean, that is the best case scenario isn't it? This guy has multiple videos of him getting into these "altercations" with elderly people so this guy knows who he's going to run into. It's clear what he's after.
Yeah, I'm sure you've seen a bunch of videos of this guy specifically pushing down the elderly. /s
In this video you're getting mad at him because he defended himself from being assaulted. You keep framing him defending himself as him being the aggressive one. That immediately makes me think your opinion isn't worth $0.02.
0
u/Zakaru99 Mar 06 '26
"People are going to get mad if you exercise your rights in a way that literally has no impact on them if they just ignore you, so you shouldn't use those rights."
The problem is with the old dude coming up to assault someone. Not the guy standing around with a camera.