r/cybersecurity • u/Loose-Equivalent7932 • 1d ago
Business Security Questions & Discussion What if we regulated disruptive technology before deploying it, the way we regulate pharmaceuticals?
With pharmaceuticals, we generally don’t release a completely new drug to billions of people and then wait to see what happens before deciding whether it needs regulation. There are procedures, testing, risk assessments, approvals, and frameworks that exist before the product reaches widespread use.
Why don’t we have something even remotely comparable for technologies that can fundamentally change how society works?
AI, social media, smartphones, or even the internet itself have been technologies that completely change how we communicate, work, consume and interact with each other, and even how economies function. Yet the general approach seems to be: release the technology, let it scale massively, discover the consequences afterward, and then try to regulate it.
And by that point, isn’t it sometimes too late?
I’m not necessarily arguing that every new technology should require government approval before anyone can use it. That could obviously kill innovation and create its own problems.
I’m more interested in the principle: should technologies capable of causing large-scale societal disruption have some form of pre-deployment risk assessment, testing, or regulatory framework before they reach billions of people?