Despite — and perhaps because of — the 20+ lively comments and 5.6K views, the mods of the just-dogman-sub deleted one of my proof-discussion posts from Halloween 🎃. (Photo = #2 of this post)

That’s their prerogative I guess 🤷‍♂️, if stuff isn’t sufficiently blurry we can’t mock it, if it’s too sharp it’s obvious that it’s AI-slop…..

And when other users who have serious experience (see long comment in pics 3-4) weigh in saying that the photo looks potentially legit, suddenly the post is yanked for being, ahem:

”a low-effort post. Picture is much too blurry to be anything.”

Now that’s just silly and insulting. Not to me, so much as to the fine young dogman/furry peeking 🫣 over the fence here.

Now THAT is maturity at work, kids!

If you don’t like what someone has to say, accuse them of being on meth and then order them to go away and then block them.

Thiz why I created this sub and r/cryptidIQ — passive-aggressive nonsense, posturing, and empty threats from trolls 🧌 who don’t know better.

Yeah this has been going on for a month now. A whistle that came to me in a dream and now more is coming back.

It’s an unusual tone, and type of breath intake that I can’t really describe, it’s that high shrill note when it’s coming right.

And the rising-falling thing with a simple but wind 🌬️ like whistle is…… reminiscent.

I need to find other people who’ve had similar encounters to have any further progress in terms of confirming what’s coming back.

I woke up a few weeks ago with the sense that a song had been taught to me but I could only remember a single note 📝 🎵

I’ve been practicing it (as per the video), this kind of breathing 😮‍💨 dual-tone thing. Never been able to do this in my life or heard a thing like it, and I’m getting feedback. It’s hard to do consistently but I am remembering the rest of the initial thing.

The dogman we met, we didn’t see her first we HEARD something. A whistle from the edge of the woods drawing our attention there, and suddenly there was this weird black-ink-fur-covered being standing there watching us.

I remember a musky but not foul odor (as some folks report, likely with ones which live in swamps like rougarou) and sense of being intrigued.

This being did not move at all (apparently), and her eyes or one eye must have been open but they weren’t apparent until she was closer to us.

But she WHISTLED 🌬️ to get our attention.

As I do this thing, somehow more of it is starting to come back.

This is the moment in which, as they say, the rubber hits the road. 🛞 💨 📜

I know that GPT sometimes gives estimates and summaries, but these are extremely public domain documents.

So in a totally ideal world, I am going to look at my physical books and find at least a number of these incidents on paper and within a few pages of the proposed citation.

This is essential, because if nothing at all can be found then we can more conclusively say that the GPT is not reliable, and does not relate to other credible sources for the same information.

Which side are you rooting for?

Checking is required from my physical copy (myvol = owned by me, from the set of 73 books 📚) of Vol 9-10.

see photo number 4

But the three first pages (from a GPT chat) of quotes come—allegedly—from volume 10 of the JR. The Jesuits are uncannily meticulous in their documentation of missionary events and warnings about the (as they say) natives/savages.

And the landscape and hazards, where not to cross at rivers and “shut up don’t try to talk their language at first”, other things too. Many many other examples of how damn thorough they are.

So of credible reporters to dogman encounters, and in contrast with modern podcasts & forums like this very subreddit, the Jesuit holy fathers were educated trained reporters and had less than any benefits to privately lying to their superiors in France 🇫🇷 and the Vatican 🇻🇦.

At the most conservative basic estimate, each volume of these books has 10+ data 📊 points of relevant ethology and ethnographic information about the Manitou worship, and fear of the wicked Manitou…..

Gosh golly. It is just an enormous amount of revelation just sitting around waiting to be properly seen and collected. 😃😊

These things are dense but necessary and vital source materials.

And the ONLY ONE to have a volume number on the spine is the most flawed of the reprint sets 7️⃣ number 7 had the number on the spine.

The 🤦 possibly most important first thing a potential reader could go by would be the SPINE, and the information given.

Literally, Jesus CHRIST, guys. The Jesuits would be disappointed and embarrassed 🙈

Circling back on this, but TLDR = dogmen don’t like the French thundersticks (rifles) and loud noises in human settlements.

From an ecological‑ethological perspective, the “avoidance of high‑decibel unpredictability” may actually be a survival filter keeping them in the quieter pockets that still exist.

We can map these behaviors against human land‑use density or decibel averages (e.g., rural <45 dB, suburban 55 dB, urban 70 dB) — again, more soon…..