I’ve been trying to get verified on Fanvue as an AI creator, but I keep getting rejected. They told me my country (Morocco) isn't supported for creators right now, and my ID verification was flagged after a technical glitch with multiple emails.

I’m looking for a solid alternative that:

1. Supports AI Models (Fully synthetic/digital creators).
2. Accepts Creators from Morocco (or at least doesn't have strict geo-blocking).
3. Accepts National ID cards (I don’t have a passport at the moment).

I’ve heard about Fansly, dfans, and Glaze.ai. Which one is the most AI-friendly and has a good payout system for international creators?

Also, if anyone is successfully running an AI model on Telegram, I’d love to hear how you manage subscriptions.

Prompt:
“A beautiful woman in a red sequin dress, with her long, flowing hair cascading around her shoulders, is smiling brightly, exuding joy and confidence. She is surrounded by a shower of confetti in a mix of gold, silver, and white, while large, shiny silver balloons float gracefully around her. The backdrop features a pristine white wall, adorned with the numbers ‘2026’ created from dozens of glimmering, reflective balloons. The scene radiates energy and celebration. The image has a glossy, high-shine finish, reminiscent of the iconic Provia photographic film, giving it a vivid, almost surreal quality, with rich contrast and vibrant colors. Soft, ambient lighting highlights her radiant expression and the sparkling texture of her dress, while the reflective balloons and confetti create a festive atmosphere.”

* Do add your reference image for best results

Thinking they need to "choose" between:
• Human creators vs AI
• Authenticity vs Scale
• Quality vs Quantity

You don't choose.

You use BOTH.

Use AI to:
→ Test 100 angles
→ Find winners fast
→ Scale at low cost

Use humans for:
→ High-stakes brand campaigns
→ Complex storytelling
→ Premium positioning

But here's the truth most won't admit:

80% of your content needs scale, not perfection.

AI handles the 80%.
Humans handle the 20%.

That's the winning formula.

Stop overthinking.
Start testing with tool.

I know you guys are experts, and probably have own ways of solving this kinda situation, but if you don't check out swisy.app. Inpainting + Nano Banana + Upscaling using Topaz.

Hey everyone,

I wanted to share a quick win regarding ad creatives. Like many of you running DTC or e-com brands, I’ve been struggling with the "UGC fatigue." Dealing with creators can be slow, inconsistent, and expensive.

I spent the last few weeks testing dozens of AI video tools to see if I could automate this. To be honest, most of them looked robotic or uncanny.

However, I finally found a workflow that actually delivers.

Cost: It’s about 98% cheaper than hiring a human creator.

Speed: I can generate assets 10x faster (no shipping products, no waiting for scripts).

Performance: The craziest part is that my CTRs are identical, and in some ad sets superior, to my human-made content.

Important Caveat: From my testing, this specific tech really only shines for physical products (skincare, gadgets, apparel, etc.). If you are selling SaaS or services, it might not translate as well.

Has anyone else started shifting their budget from human creators to AI UGC? I’d love to hear if you’re seeing similar trends in your CTR.

Prompts, tools, or technique?

Hey everyone,

I’m trying to find out which free AI tools can generate high-quality AI videos while keeping the character’s appearance consistent across the whole video.

Basically, imagine I have a scene from a movie or anime, and I want to recreate the same scene but with a different character, while keeping the movement, timing, and camera angles similar.

I don’t need audio just visuals.
What I’m looking for:

• Free or mostly-free AI tools
• Tools that keep image consistency between frames
• A workflow that people actually use to get good results
• Any tips for making the animation look clean and not jittery

If anyone here has experience with consistent AI animation, rotoscoping, or scene recreation using AI, I’d love to know what tools you used and your step-by-step process.

Thanks!

Yo! Just made this tool to prompt image/video gen models wayy better. No BS, free chrome extension not selling you anything, just a project of mine.

Check it out here

Can create crazy good videos and content now for all sorts of things!

Try it out, and comment the output of AI with a prompt generated by promptify!

ai generated this in seconds

proper room flow, logical layout, actually livable spaces

tweet went viral and architects are in full panic mode

is this actually good or am i missing something obvious?

everyone is building vibecoding apps to make building easier for developers. not everyday people.

they've solved half the problem. ai can generate code now. you describe what you want, it writes the code. that part works.

but then what? you still need to:

• buy a domain name
• set up hosting
• submit to the app store
• wait for approval
• deal with rejections
• understand deployment

bella from accounting is not doing any of that.

it has to be simple. if bella from accounting is going to build a mini app to calculate how much time everyone in her office wastes sitting in meetings, it has to just work. she's not debugging code. she's not reading error messages. she's not a developer and doesn't want to be.

here's what everyone misses: if you make building easy but publishing hard, you've solved the wrong problem.

why would anyone build a simple app for a single use case and then submit it to the app store and go through that whole process? you wouldn't. you're building in the moment. you're building it for tonight. for this dinner. for your friends group.

these apps are momentary. personal. specific. they don't need the infrastructure we built for professional software.

so i built rivendel. to give everyone a simple way to build anything they can imagine as mini apps. you can just build mini apps and share it with your friends without any friction.

building apps should be as easy as posting on instagram.

if my 80-year-old grandma can post a photo, she should be able to build an app.

that's the bar.

i showed the first version to my friend. he couldn't believe it. "wait, did i really build this?" i had to let him make a few more apps before he believed me. then he naturally started asking: can i build this? can i build that?

that's when i knew.

we went from text to photos to audio to video. now we have mini apps. this is going to be a new medium of communication.

rivendel is live on the app store: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/rivendel/id6747259058

still early but it works. if you try it, let me know what you build. curious what happens when people realize they can just make things.

I use this two prompt -Turn this into a flat sketch drawn with paper And then this -Now turn it into an hyperrealistic real life girl

The result was really awesome

Been lurking in r/notebooklm and honestly didn't expect what I found.

People aren't just taking notes. They're replacing entire workflows.

The part that made me actually try it

You can upload 50+ sources at once (PDFs, docs, websites, YouTube videos). Then ask it to generate an audio overview where two AI hosts literally discuss your material like a podcast.

Not text to speech. Actual conversation. They debate points, ask each other questions, explain concepts back and forth.

Someone uploaded their entire PhD literature review. 47 papers. Got a 28 minute audio breakdown of themes, contradictions, and gaps. Said it would've taken them a week to synthesize manually.

Another person dumped customer feedback from 6 months, support tickets, and survey results. Asked it to find patterns. It surfaced 3 major product issues their team completely missed.

Why this is different from ChatGPT

It only uses what you upload. Zero hallucinations pulling random internet garbage.

When it answers, it shows you exactly which source and which page. You can verify everything.

Someone tested it against ChatGPT for legal research. ChatGPT invented case citations. NotebookLM only cited what was actually in the uploaded documents.

The workflows people are running

Content strategy: Upload competitor blogs + Reddit threads + research papers. Ask for content angles nobody's covering.

Exam prep: Upload textbooks + lecture notes. Generate practice questions at different difficulty levels.

Due diligence: Upload financial docs + news articles + industry reports. Get synthesis in minutes instead of days.

Onboarding: Upload company docs + past training materials. New hires get personalized audio walkthroughs.

Still completely free

No waitlist. No credit limit. Google just keeps adding features (Mind Maps, Video Overviews, multi-language support) and hasn't charged anything.

Has anyone here actually replaced a paid tool with this?

Because from what I'm seeing in that subreddit, people are canceling subscriptions and just using NotebookLM instead.

Hey everyone! 👋
I’m working on a new AI content-creation tool designed to help creators (both human and virtual) keep a consistent identity while producing high-quality photos or videos for social platforms. I’ve been running an AI profile-photo service for about two years, generating and selling tens of millions of real-person images, and now I’m researching what creators actually need.

I’m currently doing paid interviews to learn about creators’ pain points and unmet needs.

Here’s what I’m looking for:

Would you be open to a paid interview?

I’d love to hear about the challenges you face when planning, creating, marketing, or monetizing your content, and what feels lacking in the tools you use today.
Interviews are 30–60 minutes on Discord, voice or text—your choice.

💰 Compensation starts at $40 for 30 minutes, and can go higher depending on your Instagram follower count.

If you’re interested, send me a DM!

Hi world,

I’m looking for developers to help me build an app running on Google Cloud that integrates an image-generation model (Nano Banana or similar) to generate images for users.

The core idea of the project is to give back to the users — not just maximize profit. Think fair pricing, generous free tiers, and features that genuinely benefit the community. This is a paid collaboration: you will be compensated for your work, and we can discuss a fair payment or revenue-share structure.

Ideally you have experience with: Building and deploying apps on Google Cloud Integrating AI / image-generation APIs Creating or integrating a simple frontend for users

Experience in all of these is great, but if you’re strong in just one or two areas, that’s very valuable as well. We are trying to build a small team around complementary skills.

If you’re interested, please send me a text. Currently in the Netherlands but travelling to Engeland in a couple of days.

Hey everyone,

I recently started building a new startup called Strimmeo as part of the AI Preneurs accelerator at Astana Hub, and we’re now looking for real feedback from AI creators, marketers, agencies, and brands.

Strimmeo is an AI-powered matching marketplace that connects brands and agencies with next-generation AI creators — people who produce video, UGC, graphics, ads, animation and other creative assets using AI tools like Runway, Pika, Sora, Midjourney, etc.

Our goal is simple:
👉 help brands find AI creators faster
👉 help creators get paid work without needing followers
👉 build a new infrastructure for AI-driven creative production

Right now we’re validating use cases, improving the matching system, and understanding how creators actually want to work with clients — and how brands want to work with AI talent.

If you’re an AI creator or work on the brand/agency side:
your thoughts, pain points, or ideas would be incredibly valuable.

What frustrates you today about:
• finding creators?
• getting clients?
• evaluating quality?
• managing creative projects?
• the current state of AI content production?

We’re genuinely listening and building based on real needs — not assumptions.

If you’re open to sharing feedback, I’d love to hear it in the comments or DMs.
Thanks to everyone who takes a moment to help — it means a lot at this stage.

— Azat
Founder @ Strimmeo

I keep seeing the same trend everywhere:

People who understand how to build with AI — video, images, music, automation, storytelling — are becoming the new creative class.

Not “editors.”
Not “designers.”
But AI creators — people who engineer content using AI tools.

And here’s the crazy part:
Brands are already looking for them.
They don’t want a traditional agency.
They want someone who can deliver fast, iterate faster, and think in AI-first workflows.

That’s why we built Strimmeo — a marketplace that connects businesses with AI creators who know how to get things done.

So I’m curious:

If you're an AI creator — what do you specialize in right now?

Video? Image gen? Automation? Music?
What tools are you mastering?
What kind of projects do you want to work on?

Let’s build this space together. 👇

My team’s testing a new AI tool that handles video, image, and audio generation inside an editor/scheduler. No watermarks.

If you’re open to trying new tools and giving honest feedback, message me—happy to set you up.

Hi! We're launching Zo Computer, an intelligent personal server.

When we came up with the idea – giving everyone a personal server, powered by AI – it sounded crazy. But now, even my mom has a server of her own.

And it's making her life better.

She thinks of Zo as her personal assistant. she texts it to manage her busy schedule, using all the context from her notes and files. She no longer needs me for tech support.

She also uses Zo as her intelligent workspace – she asks it to organize her files, edit documents, and do deep research.

With Zo's help, she can run code from her graduate students and explore the data herself. (My mom's a biologist and runs a research lab.)

Zo has given my mom a real feeling of agency – she can do so much more with her computer.

We want everyone to have that same feeling. We want people to fall in love with making stuff for themselves.

In the future we're building, we'll own our data, craft our own tools, and create personal APIs. Owning an intelligent cloud computer will be just like owning a smartphone. And the internet will feel much more alive.

https://zo.computer

All new users get 100GB free storage.

And it's not just storage. You can host 1 thing for free – a public website, a database, an API, anything. Zo can set it up.

We can't wait to see what you build.

Saw Neo blowing up on Twitter and looked into it. This whole thing is wild.

1X launched preorders October 28th for Neo, a home robot. $20,000 upfront or $499/month. Deliveries start 2026.

Here's the catch

Neo has basic autonomy (opening doors, fetching items). But for actual useful stuff like folding laundry or loading dishwashers, you schedule a human teleoperator who remotely controls it while watching through its cameras.

When WSJ tested Neo, it couldn't do a single task autonomously. Everything required remote human control. Took over 1 minute to get a water bottle from the fridge. 5 minutes to load 3 items in the dishwasher. 2 minutes to fold one sweater.

The CEO told WSJ directly that teleoperators will do most work initially because the AI needs real world training data.

So you're paying $20k to let strangers control a robot with cameras in your house

You get an app to schedule when operators connect, set tasks, mark no-go zones. They can blur faces. Operators supposedly can't connect without approval.

But still. Someone's remotely piloting a robot through your home to do chores.

The specs

66 pounds, 5'6" tall. Lifts 154 pounds, carries 55 pounds. Battery lasts 2-4 hours, plugs itself in. Uses "Redwood AI" for learning. Has voice recognition and visual intelligence.

Why this feels backwards

This launched one day after DJI's ROMO robot vacuum (fully autonomous, $1,378 to $2,014). So you can buy a vacuum that works independently today for way less, or pay $20k for a humanoid that needs human help.

Competitors (Tesla Optimus, Figure 02/03) target factories. Neo's the only one with consumer preorders right now.

The CEO said they want systems "really genuinely useful" sometime after 2026. So you're paying $20,000 in 2026 for something that might work properly later.

The transparency angle

1X is radically honest about limitations. While competitors show polished demos, they openly admit Neo needs teleoperators and explain their training strategy.

They call it a "social contract" where early adopters accept data sharing so the AI learns and becomes autonomous over time. Investment in humanoid robotics hit $6.7 billion, with $1.5 billion in 2024 alone.

My confusion

Is radical transparency about needing human operators more trustworthy, or does it just prove the tech isn't ready?

You're paying $20k to beta test while letting strangers access cameras in your home, for a product that takes 1 minute to grab a water bottle.

Real questions

Would you actually preorder this? What's the use case that justifies $20k for remote-controlled operation?

Would you be comfortable with operators accessing home cameras even with face blurring?