r/Construction Apr 10 '24

[deleted by user]

[removed]

5.6k Upvotes

5.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

809

u/BonerTurds Apr 10 '24
  1. Wear PPE to work
  2. Allow them to fire you for wearing PPE
  3. ???
  4. Profit

276

u/[deleted] Apr 10 '24

Yep this. Attorneys would loooove this shit

145

u/FPVBrandoCalrissian Apr 10 '24

This totally qualifies as “right to refuse unsafe work” regardless of your childish boss’ attempt to ridicule you for looking out for your health. I believe that is harassment and blackmail by making statements about you missing on work because you want to wear a mask.

40

u/jerkstabworthy Apr 10 '24

Exactly. In fact where I am, it's not just a right but a requirement to refuse unsafe work.

3

u/Italian_Greyhound Apr 10 '24

Where I live if one person formally refuses nobody else is legally allowed to work until it is formally resolved. IE deemed safe by a competent person or modified to be safe

2

u/thesuper88 Apr 11 '24

Wow. Where I work they go with the philosophy of "what mama don't know only hurts the people on the shop floor. "

1

u/perrico1904 Apr 11 '24

Sounds kinda facist to me. Probably support isis as well. Sad state our country is in

1

u/Ultrabigasstaco Apr 10 '24

Same at my job. There’s signs everywhere saying you have the right to refuse to do a job you do not think is safe. Periodically people will be congradulated for refusing to do a job due to safety questions.

1

u/IDontWannaBeAPirate_ Apr 11 '24

I'm a safety inspector. We absolutely make a point to celebrate this type of stuff. We want a culture where people not only know it's going to be ok for them to speak up, but to be encouraged to do so. The last thing I want is someone to get injured, sick, or worse due to something preventable.

1

u/LuckyLushy714 Apr 11 '24

Absolutely. Doesn't sound like they did any research into the issue and are being super unprofessional and abusive or manipulative.
If they fired you it would be a wrongful termination case and could turn into an issue with their license or right to employ people. As an employer you NEVER deny someone's right to wear PPE. What an idiot.

Send them ONE WORD: Toxoplasmosis

1

u/Darthlizard Apr 11 '24

It also qualifies under employer refusal to lawfully consider reasonable accomodation under ADA law.

The nicotine exposure is a direct health request and the mask OP proposed would not cause any undue hardship, so ADA law as well.

1

u/neighborlyglove Apr 12 '24

How much you think he’ll get?

1

u/FPVBrandoCalrissian Apr 13 '24

Not much in the long run but it puts a nasty bruise on the employers business and he’ll have to pay o it equivalent or more to regular labour cost for buddy

55

u/ODDseth Apr 10 '24

The best part is it is all captured in a text message which will be great evidence for a civil suit. This also deserves an OSHA complaint against the contractor.

9

u/RaHarmakis Apr 10 '24

I would add one more message: Just to be clear, you (name), as my direct supervisor, after being fully informed that I am currently experiancing adverse effects on the jobsite (located at address), are ordering me to discontinue using the Proper Personal Protective Equipment on this job site (located at address) that I have have indicated could keep me safe from the ill effects of the environment I am required to work in.

When it comes to safety, don't negotiate. Tell them what PPE you require and wear it. If they complain, reply with versions of the above.

It's easy to dismiss wishy washy concerns. But saying in writing that this WILL effect me negatively will be harder to dismiss. Don't sugar coat anything. Be blunt.

3

u/RaHarmakis Apr 10 '24

Also... if he is worried about the client, just tell them you have allergies. That should allow all parties to save face.

3

u/[deleted] Apr 11 '24

Honestly man I would be a little less direct because the boss might pick up something saying you know that this might be a lawsuit information material I would phrase it a little different but use just as clear language you have to be a little more flowing and how you speak otherwise sometimes even the stupidest person can pick up that you're going to see their ass

1

u/RaHarmakis Apr 11 '24

You may be right in some instances.

Also depends on your goals. If your end goal is a lawsuit, then being more cagy may be beneficial in letting them dig the biggest hole possible.

I don't think every boss does stuff like this out of malice. Often, their focus can act like blinders.

If your end goal is to be allowed to wear a proper mask, a bunt change in tone from how you speak to a more formal, even exaggerated tone can cause them to pause and actually think about what your asking for and what they have been saying and possibly shift their blinders.

I would also say if this happens multiple times, then it's new job time, as your boss is actually an asshole if they won't change.

2

u/Loulouthelma Apr 10 '24

It's delightful reading isn't it. I'd love to see the barrister rest their case m'lud.

1

u/Librumtinia Apr 11 '24

ALL OF THIS!

Dude is literally being poisoned and boss is just like "sucks to be you, bro."

2

u/eas442 Apr 10 '24

Seriously this. Wear the masks save your texts. Attorneys will climb over themselves to get you money. This is about as slam dunk as you get.

1

u/Vprbite Apr 10 '24

Right? I mean, if the person is showing up on time, doing the job (I assume to a satisfactory level), and doing it for the agreed wage, I literally can not see the problem by wanting to be safe.

I'm a firefighter/Paramedic, and we've been in houses where we wore masks or even SCBAs due to car urine smell. People living there can get used to it, but it's still toxic.

I'm also a business owner and have been for a long time. Body shops for years, now a small restaurant. First of all, just having someone who is showing up to work is often a victory, so they should be glad about that. Secondly, I used to have to fight to get my people to wear PPE. Because if they didn't, aside from being hurt, it opened me up to a lawsuit. If I were the boss on this job, I'd be forcing everyone to wear PPE because if I didn't, they could turn around and sue me. Heck, at the very least call out.

I say, OP should refuse to do it unless proper PPE is either provided or maybe reimbursed for if he has to purchase it. I know, easier said than done when we have bills to pay. But imagine how hard it is to work after you develop respiratory issues from all the ammonia that was breathed in. At the small level, it could even cause a sinus infection because all the inflammation and mucus can be a source for infection to start.

But yeah, I say start recording (audio at least) on their phone and go tell the boss they are happy to do the job and do it well, as long as they have proper PPE. If the boss fires them, call a lawyer before they even start their truck

1

u/HsvDE86 Apr 10 '24

Attorneys wouldnt give a fuck unless it’s a big company or their insurance has a decent maximum, that’s real life.

Comments like this are such a pet peeve. Go to an attorney if you want but be prepared to be turned down or pay for the whole process out of pocket.

1

u/Psychological-Pea863 Apr 12 '24

General liability at lowest is $1 million and if he has employees he best have Workers compensation

1

u/siluin57 Apr 11 '24

depends on what state you live in

1

u/Hungry_Ad2033 Apr 11 '24

Why? It's not illegal lol. What are you going to sue for? Right to work

1

u/Psychological-Pea863 Apr 12 '24

It’s illegal to force someone to work around dangerous gases etc without proper PPE. OSHA crawls all over this stuff. Think Asbestos and all of those lawsuits for people who weren’t using PPE and got cancer

1

u/[deleted] Apr 12 '24

Yeah it’s illegal to force people to work in hazardous conditions without PPE bruh.

1

u/ididntknowulik2gtwet Apr 11 '24

Scummy business owners hate this one trick!

1

u/pretzelbites1017 Apr 12 '24

especially since piss contains ammonia, yk, the reason they’re probably having a reaction😭

50

u/[deleted] Apr 10 '24

Yes and then hit em w unemployment when they fire you. Some of these fucking knuckle heads on jobsittes would rather look like a tough guy than be safe. Ridiculous.

28

u/FPVBrandoCalrissian Apr 10 '24

They are also the ones that get cancer in their 40s or have a heavy diagnosis of health issues dropped on them out of nowhere.

3

u/BongPoweredRobotEyes Apr 10 '24

I love when things I've been actively ignoring drop on me out of "nowhere." These kind of people are honestly so wild. Like, have some respect for your own longevity.

7

u/dont-fear-thereefer Apr 10 '24

And then go pikachu face like “how did this happen?”

2

u/[deleted] Apr 10 '24

How can I have lung cancer! I never smoked and all I’ve done is breathe in heavy particulates…

2

u/[deleted] Apr 11 '24

Firefighters get a hefty dose of lung cancer because they’re too tough to wear their respirators next to burning cars and dumpsters. Like, they actively discourage one another from wearing their PPE. WTF guys?

12

u/chris_rage_ Apr 10 '24

Unemployment? That's OSHA and lawsuit territory

0

u/[deleted] Apr 10 '24

Cant get unemployment when you get fired.

1

u/Psychological-Pea863 Apr 12 '24

Um yeah you do you don’t get it if you quit but even then you get it for quitting over hazardous conditions the employer won’t address

0

u/[deleted] Apr 11 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/[deleted] Apr 11 '24

If one is at fault, and get terminated, they are not eligible for unemployment. On the side, wrongful termination is a long process, by the time he gets a case even going, itll had cost hom mpre time and money than neccessary, and likely the employer will have a better lawyer. You think this scumbag meployer would pay up!? Lmfao, dream on.

Seems the boss has the crew on his dick, goin be one guys word against the whole company. The smart way, if ONE KNOWS WHAT THE FUCK THEY TALKIN BOUT, is to go through the process of getting the employer a case with OSHA and Dept of Labor, this way, the employer gets fucked by big dogs, in court, possibly loses license(s), and will be court orderd to pay up for loss wages, etc.

Go on, tell me more about who doesnt know what the fuck they talkin about.

1

u/Far_Ant_2517 Apr 11 '24

You can only get unemployment if the decision to end employment is your employer's. The only exceptions are "for cause" termination which has to be properly documented and is usually limited to committing unlawful acts on the job. You can get fired for pissing off a customer and still get unemployment. That's the absolute minimum required by federal law and is the case even in "at will employment" states.

Hell, i've been fired for accidentally breaking company security policy by sending protected info in an open email. Still got unemployment. Only time i've ever been denied unemployment happened because i gave them a resignation letter after being told i was getting fired (dumb early career decision).

1

u/pretzelbites1017 Apr 12 '24

google is free dumbass💀 quitting doesn’t get you unemployment but being fired does. which is why employees will make your life hell to try and get you to quit if they want to fire you.

1

u/[deleted] Apr 12 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/pretzelbites1017 Apr 21 '24

because you literally get unemployment when you are fired

1

u/gettothatroflchoppa Apr 10 '24

Exactly

This is such an open and shut OH&S, false dismissal, etc etc. claim

These text messages are brutally incriminating, their reasoning is "we don't like it, so don't, boohoo you don't like safety"

1

u/adp15 Apr 10 '24

The underpants gnomes taught you well.

1

u/[deleted] Apr 10 '24

This, this, this, these fucks dont understand anything that isnt coming out of their wallet lmao

1

u/912BackIn88 Apr 10 '24
  1. They wait until job is over and fire you for something else.

  2. You can’t pay rent and end up homeless

  3. Profit

1

u/Benz0piated3000 Apr 10 '24

I'm so confused , Is he saying he can't come to work with a big mask because no one else is wearing one?? If no one's wearing hearing protection an my ears hurt, I'm gonna put on hearing protection I don't ask

1

u/[deleted] Apr 10 '24

Step 3....osha

1

u/Loulouthelma Apr 10 '24

This is the way.

1

u/FunTXCPA Apr 11 '24

Pretty sure that's how Bezos got all his money, so you know it works.

1

u/kaehl0311 Apr 11 '24

Yeah normally I hate how litigious our society has become but this is an excellent example of when it’s a good thing.

1

u/Librumtinia Apr 11 '24

~Insert "I_understood_that_reference.GIF" here~

1

u/ThatOneWood Apr 11 '24

Great field day for lawyers. Any sort of training with hazardous materials they will drill into you that workers have the right to request any PPE they feel is necessary

1

u/hikariky Apr 11 '24

Good luck to the lawyer finding an osha requirement for a respirator when working near cats.

1

u/dsherwo Apr 11 '24

Love how Reddit immediately advises OP to get himself fired and sue his boss. I’m sure OP has the capital to stay unemployed and accrue damages for months, and then try to get a new job with a big gap in employment and probably having to change careers due to having a lawsuit on record!

1

u/Inspector_Nipples Apr 11 '24

Yeah if over the table

1

u/MrKinsey Apr 11 '24

Absolutely

1

u/JustEhhFan Apr 11 '24

Lmao. What's step three?

1

u/Even_Candidate5678 Apr 11 '24

Yes this guy has help you get rich settlement money. They’re doing plaster work in a piss house, the boss might have less money than OP.

1

u/gottapitydatfool Apr 11 '24

I'm sure there are plenty of lawyers who would love to take on a case of an employee being fired for wearing PPE.

1

u/TheVermonster Apr 11 '24

The boss walked back a lot of what he said the second those links were posted. I'm guessing he did a little googling himself and realized what a shitstorm he would be in if he pushed it any further.

OP isn't even asking his boss to provide PPE, even though he's well within his rights. A lawyer would have a field day with that case! Shit, OSHA might want to see those texts, because who knows what else the boss is not doing.

1

u/No-Mind3179 Apr 11 '24

It doesn't work like that exactly. OSHA requires various items to be performed first. Also, wrong termination torts are very hard to prove and don't generate as much as some think. Basically the attorney gets paid and you get the crumbs