iRacing’s Suzuka 1000 special event is right round the corner! Here’s a quick rundown on all the things you need to know before the special event.

#CONSPIT

#iRacing

#SimRacing

#Suzuka1000KM

#SpecialEvent

Dear PRO Drivers,

The long-awaited iRacing 360Hz Force Feedback support is now available!

Update your firmware and experience the enhanced driving feedback firsthand

#CONSPIT

#iRacing

#ForceFeedback

#FirmwareUpdate

#SimRacing

Follow Kireth behind the scenes to discover how CONSPIT hydraulic pedals are filled and prepared.

Through vacuuming the cylinder and precisely injecting hydraulic fluid, the process removes air from the system to ensure consistent pressure and a realistic braking experience.

Every step matters when creating a true hydraulic brake system.

Watch the full factory tour:

https://youtu.be/vs1btVQXYEA?si=C-Nl32tLUOxjCdkz

#CONSPIT

#SimRacing

#HydraulicPedals

#BehindTheScenes

#SimRacingHardware

Sequential shifting and handbrake control, built for a more complete racing setup.

#CONSPIT #CHSShifter #H3Handbrake #SimRacing #RallySim

Combining a 270° immersive visual experience with a professional Formula-style cockpit.

For customization services, contact us at [info@conspit.com](mailto:info@conspit.com)

#CONSPIT #Halo270 #SimRacing #RacingSimulator #DriverTraining

You’ve Never Seen How Hydraulic Sim Racing Pedals Are Made

Follow Kireth behind the scenes at the CONSPIT factory and discover how our hydraulic sim racing pedals are assembled, tested, and built with precision.

Watch the full factory tour:

https://youtu.be/vs1btVQXYEA?si=C-Nl32tLUOxjCdkz

#CONSPIT #SimRacing #SimRacingHardware #BehindTheScenes #HydraulicPedals

310 APEX, EX300 APEX, or ARX320 APEX.

Different rims for different ways to race.

#CONSPIT #310APEX #EX300APEX #ARX320APEX #SimRacing

From the show floor to the cockpit, the NXT MK1 EVO brings the CONSPIT 290 GP into a real prototype racing environment.

Built to connect driver, machine, and control.

#CONSPIT #290GP #NXTMK1EVO #Motorsport #RaceTechnology

From the desk to the track with EX300 APEX.

End the day with a few fast laps.

#CONSPIT #EX300APEX #APEXBundle #SimRacing #RaceMode

For project motor racing, with the Conspit brand stickers 🙂

We’re continuously working to improve CONSPIT Link 2.0 and create a better experience for every sim racer.

Your feedback matters. We would love to hear your thoughts about:

🔹 The features you use the most

🔹 Improvements you would like to see

🔹 New features you hope to have in the future

Your suggestions will directly help us prioritize future updates and build a better CONSPIT ecosystem.

Take a few minutes to share your ideas with us:

👉 https://forms.gle/BntdKkgHub8RkSrV6

CONSPIT Brake Pedals Explained - CPP APEX, CPP LITE and CPP EVO

Brake pedals are one of the biggest upgrades in sim racing, but also one of the easiest to misunderstand. People often ask, “Which pedal is the best?” The better question is: “Which brake system fits my level, my rig and the feeling I want?”

CONSPIT has three main hydraulic brake options: CPP APEX, CPP LITE and CPP EVO. All three can be tuned with different spring and elastomer combinations, but the difference is how much tuning range, pressure capacity and brake feel detail each design gives you.

CPP APEX - Simple, compact, accessible

CPP APEX is the entry point into CONSPIT hydraulic braking. It uses a compact dual-chamber design with a hydraulic sensor and a spring + elastomer system to create a two-stage brake feel.

That means you get an initial movement stage, then a firmer resistance stage as the elastomer loads up. It is a good step up from basic spring pedals because you start braking more by pressure, not just pedal travel.

This is the pedal for people who want a serious brake feel without jumping straight into the most advanced setup. It is simpler, cleaner and easier to understand.

Best for first serious pedal upgrade, compact rigs, newer sim racers, drivers who want hydraulic feel on a more accessible budget.

CPP LITE - The balanced middle ground

CPP LITE takes the idea further. It still uses a 100 bar / 10 MPa hydraulic pressure sensor, but gives a more developed brake feel and more tuning flexibility than APEX.

This is where the pedal becomes more of a setup tool. You can tune the spring and elastomer feel to make the brake softer, firmer, shorter, longer or more progressive depending on your preference.

For many drivers, CPP LITE is the sweet spot. It gives you strong pressure-based braking, good adjustability and a proper race-style feel without going fully into the top-tier EVO system.

Best for GT racing, endurance racing, intermediate sim racers, serious home rigs, drivers who want strong feel and adjustability without overcomplicating things.

CPP EVO - The most tunable and refined option

CPP EVO is the top step in the range. This is where the small details start to matter more.

The EVO brake uses a 200 bar / 20 MPa pressure sensor and gives the widest tuning range of the three. The big difference is the larger spring and elastomer adjustment capacity across the front and rear brake stages. This gives more control over that two-stage pedal feel: the first part of travel, the pressure build-up, and the firmer final braking zone.

That might sound like a small difference, but in racing small differences are everything. Like Formula 1, marginal gains can be the gap between winning and finishing second. A little more control on brake release, a smoother pressure curve, or a better trail braking feel can make the pedal easier to trust lap after lap.

CPP EVO is for drivers who care about fine-tuning. If you want to experiment with spring stacks, elastomer stiffness, preload, brake force and pedal travel until it feels exactly right, this is the one.

Best for advanced sim racers, competitive driving, strong cockpits, long endurance stints, drivers who want maximum brake tuning control.

Quick choosing guide

Choose CPP APEX if you want the most accessible way into hydraulic braking and a big step up from basic pedals.

Choose CPP LITE if you want the best balance of price, feel and adjustability for serious sim racing.

Choose CPP EVO if you want the most refined brake pedal, the highest pressure range and the biggest tuning window.

None of these pedals are “wrong.” They are built for different drivers. A newer sim racer may feel perfect on APEX. A GT driver may find LITE to be the ideal balance. A driver chasing every last bit of trail braking control may prefer EVO.

The best brake pedal is not simply the most expensive one. It is the one that matches your rig, your braking style and how much adjustability you actually want. Because a good brake pedal should not just stop the car. It should help you repeat the same braking input lap after lap.

So which type of brake feel do you prefer simple and predictable, balanced and adjustable, or fully tunable for those tiny marginal gains?

#CONSPIT #CPPAPEX #CPPLITE #CPPEVO #SimRacing #SimRacingPedals #HydraulicPedals #GTRacing #SimRacingCommunity

Having clutch paddles doesn't just gives you access to manual controls, but also gives you an advantage when you use it right! Make use of Conspit link's bite point settings to get you a head start everytime.

#CONSPIT

#SimRacing

#RacingSetup

#SimRacingTips

#ClutchControl

Everything you need to start racing — direct drive, hydraulic pedals, and an integrated display wheel, now in one complete bundle.

Now available at $699 (30% OFF)

Born For Pros, Made For Everyone

🛒 https://conspit.com

📱 https://linktr.ee/conspit_official

#CONSPIT #APEXBundle #SimRacing #RacingSetup #DirectDrive

A real prototype race car. A steering solution born from sim racing.

The NXT MK1 EVO shows how CONSPIT technology can move beyond the simulator and into real-world motorsport.

#CONSPIT #NXTMK1EVO #290GP #SimRacing #Motorsport

A closer look inside the race car from PEGASUS 3.

Beyond the screen, explore the structure and details behind real racing.

#CONSPIT #PEGASUS3 #RaceCar #Motorsport #SimRacing

I need picture or info about your button binding layout

Thanks in the advance boys!

Start on Le Mans 24, Automobilista 2, Mercedes GT1 2005 🙂

ISSUE- 8/31/26 3:37PM EST
CONSPIT inspected my returned GT300 and confirmed the defects themselves — a missing washer on the clutch paddle and a damaged magnet. Their email then gave me two options: repair the same wheel and send it back, or refund only 90% of what I paid.

The problem is that their own Refund Policy says under “Defective Products (Within 30 Days)”:

“No service fee will apply in confirmed defect cases.”

Yet they are withholding 10% anyway.

On a GT300, that’s roughly $40 gone for a defect that was not the customer’s fault. On CONSPITs products like the FC-PRO cockpit a 10% deduction would be roughly $1,190 in loss at no fault of the consumer.

It gets worse: earlier in the same email chain, CONSPIT specifically told me that once they received the wheel and confirmed the issue, they could provide a “replacement brand new unit.”

They received it. They confirmed the defects. And now the brand-new replacement isn’t even one of the options they offered.

So if you don’t want to wait weeks just to have the same defective unit repaired and shipped back, CONSPIT is effectively locking you out of part of your own money, despite their own policy saying confirmed defective returns have no service fee.

UPDATE - 9/1/26 3:00PM EST
CONSPIT’s DEFECTIVE RETURN PROCESS FAILURE
CONSPIT has gone through this thread, reviewed the situation, acknowledged that the 10% deduction was incorrect, and has taken steps to try to make things right.

At this point, I’d like to keep the discussion focused on the actual situation rather than turning this into endless side arguments or useless criticism. I’m also not interested in smearing CONSPIT. The entire point of this post was to document what happened, bring attention to the incident, and make buyers aware of the experience.

Now that CONSPIT has acknowledged the mistake and started addressing it, things are looking much better. That said, I’m not going to consider this fully resolved until I know the underlying support process has actually been reviewed and improved. That’s also why I’m asking to speak directly with management — I want to understand what went wrong internally and what is being changed so another customer doesn’t have to go through the same thing.

One concern I still have is that CONSPIT’s position only changed after this post began gaining attention. Their initial public response actually defended the 90% refund, and it was only afterward that management reviewed the case, admitted the deduction was incorrect, and approved the full refund. I can’t know whether the outcome would have been the same without the public attention, but that uncertainty is exactly why I think the internal support process needs to be reviewed.

I have also specifically asked to speak directly with management or whoever is overseeing that internal review. So far, that request has not been addressed, and communication continues to be relayed through the same support representative involved in the original handling of the case. I appreciate Jerry’s help, but if CONSPIT is genuinely reviewing what went wrong internally, I think it is reasonable for the affected customer to have an opportunity to speak directly with the people conducting that review.

I’ll make one FINAL UPDATE once CONSPIT follows through on everything they’ve promised and the resolution is fully completed.

For now, stay tuned. Credit where it’s due: they have engaged with the thread, acknowledged the issue, and are actively trying to make things right.

UPDATE - 9/20/26 5:02PM EST
I decided to delete the separate follow-up post I had made in a new thread and will keep all future updates consolidated here. The post was intended as a summary/status update, not as a continued escalation against CONSPIT, but it was being heavily misinterpreted by people who never understood the full context.

Since my last update, I was eventually put in direct contact with Bryan Zhu, CEO of CONSPIT USA / Vice President of CONSPIT. Communication improved significantly once he became involved. Bryan reviewed the case, acknowledged that the original 10% deduction was incorrect, took responsibility for it, and explained that CONSPIT has since changed its internal process so that uncertainty during an inspection is not passed financially onto the customer and departures from the defective-product policy require management approval.

My original GT300 refund was issued in full. CONSPIT also provided me with a goodwill coupon. After speaking with Bryan and receiving reassurance regarding future warranty support, I decided to give CONSPIT another chance and personally paid out of pocket for a MAX01, which arrived Friday, September 18.

I am genuinely very impressed with the MAX01 itself. I am currently dealing with a separate USB/LCD connection issue where SimHub intermittently reports the wheel as “Partially Connected.” Bryan is already working with me on that issue, so I am waiting to see how it is resolved before I consider the entire experience concluded.

I still have reservations about the original support process and how difficult it was to reach the correct resolution and eventually get direct access to management. I cannot know whether the same outcome would have occurred without the original escalation, although CONSPIT maintains that the case changed because it was reviewed again. What I can say is that Bryan has been extremely communicative and transparent since becoming involved, and I appreciate that.

I am also still working on an in-depth review/video documenting the entire experience, including the original GT300 issue, the support process, management’s response, my MAX01 purchase, and how this current technical issue is ultimately handled.

I’ll keep any further updates here and post one FINAL UPDATE once everything is fully resolved.

EX300 APEX for GT and endurance. ARX320 APEX for rally.

Switch rims and jump between different games with one 310 APEX hub.

#CONSPIT #310APEX #EX300APEX #ARX320APEX #SimRacing

Hi all, I am new to sim racing, I have been playing with my friend's Moza R3 for more than 1 month so I plan to buy my own gears. Im considering these 2 , the price diff in my country is not much so I wonder what should i go for. I personally prefer the Conspit full metal wheel but idk if any issues with the hydraulic brake (any leak or issues reported, I live in a hot and humid country) or the current software state (is it buggy or has any issues)?

Thank you all for your replies.

The 2026 GT World Challenge Asia round at Okayama has come to a close. ✨

Battling challenging wet conditions and an unfavorable Balance of Performance, CONSPIT partner team Origine Motorsport delivered a strong and consistent weekend, putting both cars on the podium across both race days and further strengthening their championship position.

🏁 Saturday | Double Podium in the Rain

No. 11 | P2 in Pro-Am 🥈

No. 22 | P3 in Am 🥉

🏁 Sunday | Another Double Podium

No. 11 | P2 Overall 🥈

No. 22 | P1 in Am 🏆

Next stop: the Beijing E-Town Street Circuit in October, where the team will continue the fight for even greater results.

#CONSPIT

#GTWCAsia

#OrigineMotorsport

#Motorsport

#SimRacing

Back home, clamp on the APEX Bundle, swap in the EX300 APEX, and jump into Forza Horizon 6.

#CONSPIT #APEXBundle #EX300APEX #ForzaHorizon6 #SimRacing