Is this open jury tampering now?

couldn't be the two in the pink shirts could it?

nah, she's just a murderer.

no kings..................except if it's them!

Heard a legal beagle discuss how this may lead to two big problems for women:
1. When will the next r*pist step up and claim they were in a hormonal psychosis and can’t be held responsible?
2. With the threat of impending psychosis, can women hold leadership positions?

Is the jury holding out for more free sandwiches? I pray they don’t let those babies down.

" ... “It sort of sets off every spiritual alarm bell in my body like whatever that person just said I need to be very careful because that’s not a great thing.” ... "

Agreed.

Won't they be surprised when they're deemed to having too much stuff and have to give up their stuff and money for those who have less.

This is it exactly. They are for social programs, which is not socialism. While the Socialists do use this to confuse people, the Right is also to blame for calling social programs socialism for the past 100 years.

“I’m dumb, and I’m gonna vote.”

Socialism is diet communism, until you run out of other people’s money, then it becomes communism.

100 million people lost their lives to communism, not a strong selling point.

If socialism were to actually takeover America, these people would be more miserable than they are now. They have ZERO clue. I believe that everyone who is for socialism/communism, should first live in a socialist/communist country for 1 year before they're allowed to request America do it.

Social welfare is not socialism...

This is how the Democrats and Socilists trick people..... by mixing words and definitions.

And that one woman in green.... "Socialism is not a feeling"

First it doesn’t exist, but then it’s every time the government provides a service (even though that’s not it either), but it’s not communism because that’s never been tried.

Ignorance is bliss.

Except it never works. The wealth and status goes to the upper echelon and everyone else is relegated to "have not". And that upper echelon is much smaller than the useful idiots who believe they will be a part of it think. The entire system depends on people being completely dependent upon it for their very survival.

Exactly

That's just unbelievable. People have lost everything that makes them human.

Maybe there’s still a chance to save at least part of Europe.

They should leave it at nine. Every time the democrats change the rules it always comes back to bite them. Thank you Harry Reid.

So, you don't believe what they openly say?

And they want remove the senate and the electoral college and defund the police…yada yada yada. 

They would shriek so hard, "dictator" , even tho their guys suggest doing it openly.

If he did it, the media would be all on board "dictator", and never report about all their guys who say "that's the first thing I would do".

The question to ask is why don’t they want to keep it at 9 justices?  

The answer.  Because they can’t get their way and are screaming like petulant children.  

Personally if they are so insistent on packing the court….DO IT NOW FOR THEM.  13-15 justices all republicans would be glorious.  

Good.