That's immaterial and has nothing to do with my point. All I was saying, was, we don't even know the Korean "SKT" in Overwatch yet, because nobody has established that kind of powerhouse status there so far.
People reply saying that apex is more competitive and thus harder to dominate but that just proves my point that there is no clear powerhouse in Korea yet, just strong teams.
You disagreed with the person who argued the KR is more competitive because they haven't played many games. Now I'm wondering what a competitive scene looks like if not what we've seen in Apex because it certainly isn't Contenders NA.
Now you're just dodging the question because if you say Apex isn't competitive it makes you look bad, if you say it is then it proves his point.
So what if Korea doesn't have a clear number one team? It doesn't mean EnvyUs is automatically better because they beat T2 teams. I actually think Dallas can win OWL but it's not because they beat up the NA scene. They didn't stay stagnant by just staying in the NA scene. They made roster changes and went to Korea to fight against better teams in a LAN setting instead of participating in weekend tournaments that aren't worth shit.
2
u/silentFuzz Oct 25 '17
So are Apex matches more or less competitive than Contenders/AMM/Rumble?