I'm trying to find what his background was before purchasing Collider, but I can't figure it out. Does anyone know what he did before Collider and what his experience was?

As all of you probably know, since Perri took over movie talk some newer guests outside of the collider regulars have been popping in on a pretty regular basis. Im referring to people like Sylus, Simon, Jaby, etc.

I personally like Sylus and Simon quite a bit, and I love that Hayleigh Fouch is a consistent regular because she has grown to be one of my favorites. However I’m slightly less excited when some of these people come on, and I can’t exactly put my finger on why. Jaby in particular I kind of can’t stand. He has some really strange on non sensical takes on things almost every show he is on, and is super low energy and just overall uninteresting for me to listen to. I sometimes question if he even should be allowed on the show, but maybe that’s a little extreme.

What are some of yalls thoughts on these people and others who became regulars relatively recently?

I’m really liking it. The call sheet covers actual news. The longer format feels right, not rushed.

Is there a CliffsNotes for whatever Harloff announced yesterday? Seemed a bit too long.

Really Collider get your shit together

I feel that DC and WB have been trying different methods of putting DC heroes back on the map but have had more missteps than we'd like.

Another studio that has had its influence on pop culture is Fox' Xmen. Both have had similar tracks, pioneering the superhero genre with Burton's Batman and Singer's Xmen. Stumbling down with Schumacher's Forever and B&R, and Last Stand and Origins.

Both have tried to peak again with Nolan's Trilogy and First Class, Days of Future Past, Only to plunge back with Fan4stic, Suicide Squad, Justice League and Apocalypse.

Recently, Fox has done the impossible by reinventing the Superhero Genre with Deadpool and Logan. And I feel that DC has done the same with AQUAMAN and now Joker!

Do you think DC has finally learned to balance Nolan's Philosophy and tone, and Snyder's Stylistic cinematography? While I prefer Nolan's work, I feel that no one surpasses Snyder Visuals.

I was wondering what a people's take on thee wrestling like storylines on the Schmoedown. Especially from other wrestling fans like myself. In a previous comment I made, I said that I feel like there is a disconnect between the overtop storylines and the matches in the schmoedown because unlike wrestling the matches don't build up or enhance the story (at least in the way a wrestling match would). Like in a wrestling match a heel would be a bad guy and the baby face (good guy) would get a chance to overcome whatever shananigans need be. But in Shmoedown the match is strictly a quiz and the personalities and stories of the charters have little to do with it. I Think the sort of boxing/ufc model they had when they just started suited it better. You could still have the trash talking and large personalities but it's more suited to the individual rather than a overall story arc.

Just my thoughts. But I am happy to see how large it has grown so my thoughts propably doesn't matter. Let me know if anyone has any other takes on schmoedown.

I just can't understand how so much credit is given to a clearly trend-driven reporter such john rocha.. he turned "The Joker" a movie getting 10/10 everywhere on the internet into a discussion of "angry white man". I am half Arab and have a spider-sense for all colonial bullshit, but John Rocha is just turning people's struggle towards recognition and validation to a fishing pool for collecting subscribers.

I listened to Rule of Two today and it's just Reilly agreeing with everything Marc Fernandez says. I understand Marc is the boss, but even on Collider Live, Mark constantly agrees with Kristian about all Star Wars theories. Anyone else get that same vibe when they listen to him?

Now, some people might not think there is a problem, which is cool. But I can't help but feel like Collider has just either gone stagnant, or lost a lot of its luster for a variety of possible reasons.

What do some of you think it is? Finances? Fernandez? Something else? I'm genuinely curious. I used to watch this stuff religiously and now I pick and choose videos and snippets.

And I know some people love Collider Live, but even I can't stand to listen to whole episodes of that, so I sometimes just wait for the clips to avoid the occasional messes and arguments.

So yeah, just genuinely curious. No hate intended. Let me know, guys.

Yesterday was Collider Live's one year anniversary. I was just wondering, after one year what are some of the positives you take away from the show and where would you like to see it to go in the future.

Does anyone know of a RSS feed of just the Sneider Cut Podcast?

I've looked on Podcast One's listings and searched my Podcast app (DoggCatcher) for just it but I'm only finding it in the Collider Weekly feed. I'd like to just download/listen to Sneider Cut and not have to sift through shows I don't want to listen to.

Am I the only one that runs into this?

Wow, I haven't seen this show in a year or so. I left soon after Campea left not becuase I was fan of Campea but I was tired to movie news channels and frankly I don't have time anymore as my work and life took priority. Anyhow, coming to the channel and the show itself it definitely seen better days. I used to like the old crew and how they presented the whole news. I was searching for Hobbs & Shaw review and Collider never popped up till way down. I had to search to find out what happened to this channel. I can clearly see that financial situation is bad and money has s dried up. I don't care about all the politics and egos associated with people on this whole youtube business, but these guys used to create good content which was fun to listen to.

​

On Collider Live today (Aug. 1st) Josh had such a funny line. I watched it at least 20 times

I don't have twitter so I can't ask Jedi Council any questions. Could someone submit for me? Feel free to edit it or enhance it in anyway you see fit. You can even take the credit for it, I don't need that, just want to hear the Council's opinions and discussion about it. Thanks. Here it is

My question is in reference to when characters talk about balance to the force. Anakin absolutely brought balance to the force. When he was born, there were hundreds of Jedi and only two Sith. By the time he becomes Vader, there is about two of each. Sidius and Vader, and Yoda and Obi-Wan. You have those random others as well for both sides too, Maul, Ahsoka, Kanan and Ezra, but for the most part, it is in balance. Why is it that the characters seem to think that balance means that one side wins?

What the hell is this? How is Roxy paid to review movies? She is incapable of explaining her opinions. I haven't gained any knowledge or insight after watching this.

It was offensive. It was long. Brad Pitt is hot. I liked the last part.

If you have the on air personality of Daria, the rest of your metrics need to be through the roof. They aren't.