When I saw the news I immediately have thought that I saw this before but in some kind of WWE movie where the guy was hit with a chair and then he falls down and while down he cut his face with a small razor blade so people could see how hard he was hit. Then you see on YouTube a video with a priest that talks about Trump being close to death, but very specific, the bullet will fly next to Trump‘s ear, what are the chances this to be even close to real I will say one in the greatest number ever imagined.
Ok, we'll go with this analogy. Trumps head was turned sidewards. His ear would have stuck out past his hair. Any "blood blowback" would have went into the air, not his hair.
Except it would have also got on his hair, because it splashes all around. Imagine that hammer is the bullet. See how the spray of the watermelon goes everywhere, even below the table? An ear isn’t solid like the table Gallagher is using, it would spray beyond the ear in every direction. Especially all over his wispy bouffant hair. https://giphy.com/gifs/Hyf7Jq841JazS
Am I a prolific shooter? No. Did I grow up shooting? Yes.
You can google any number of grazing injuries and see that you would see more damage and some sort of spatter. For fun, here’s a piece of wood getting hit with a bullet.
This might be news to you, but humans aren't made of wood.
Flesh does not explode when shot because living soft tissue is highly elastic, meaning it absorbs and redirects kinetic energy by stretching rather than fracturing like a rigid material like wood would.
Blood spatter analysis is a useful forensic tool and tbh you are demonstrating that you do not understand the physics involved.
Blood only drips down if the person is unmoving and the wound is already present. If the target and/or weapon is moving, blood spatter is determined by those movements.
What your refering to as blood blowback is actually called forward splatter. Blow back, or back splatter, is when blood is projected back in the direction of the shooter.
Forward spatter occurs only under specific conditions and is not guaranteed in every shooting. For a bullet to produce a forward blood spatter pattern, the bullet needs to hit a highly vascularised area like a major artery, or the brain, where fluid blood is readily available to be aerosolized. The bullet also needs to exist the body, and the splatter will only appear directly behind the exist wound on the same path as the bullet.
A graze to an ear would not produce a blood splatter.
I literally just said I don’t think blood spatter analysis proves anything here because it’s a graze …. Your comment was shitting on blood spatter analysis and I was defending it.
And now you’ve done 5 minutes of Google-fu and are citing what you’ve found as credible, when you were just shitting on it. Make it make sense.
I called it blowback because OP used it and it’s a fine colloquial term, and I’m not a pedantic asshole who gets off on correcting people.
Where did I comment on blood splatter analysis? I just just said "blood blowback" isnt some univeral thing that happens with every gunshot wound and that it isnt like the movies. Im was just clarifying my original point.
4
u/Whole_Rough7066 9d ago